View clinical trials related to Dental Implant Failed.
Filter by:Various risk factors defined in the literature should be eliminated in order for the patient to be able to use implant-supported prostheses for a longer period of time. In the literature, such a diagram for peri-implant risk factors was first described by Heitz-Mayfield in 2020. The scheme that will determine the peri-implant risk diagram is called "Implant Disease Risk Assessment (IDRA)". This tool provides evaluation of various risk factors on a single diagram. In this study, peri-implant risk diagrams will be determined by calling the patients who have previously completed implant treatment in Kütahya University of Health Sciences Faculty of Dentistry Department of Periodontology, and the change in the risk profile assessment will be re-evaluated after the risk factors that can be eliminated are eliminated. In this study, it is aimed to predict the risk of inflammation and alveolar bone loss of the tissues around the implant that may occur in the future in patients who have undergone dental implant treatment, and to evaluate the risk profiles.
Dental implants have become one of the most common treatments used for the rehabilitation of lost teeth. The success rate of dental implant treatment is quite high. One of the criteria used for long-term implant success is the evaluation of radiographic marginal bone loss. Implants are used at the bone and tissue level in implant treatment. In this study, it was planned to use 20 implants of the same brand, with a single implant in the bilateral posterior regions in 10 patients.The study will be designed as split-mouth. The implant will be placed at the bone level with the same protocol in the two edentulous areas and the flap will be closed primarily. After 3 months, the substructure of the two-piece abutment concept system will be placed in a region during the healing head placement stage, and the bone level implant will be converted to the tissue level. A conventional healing cap will be placed in the other area. Periapical radiographs will be taken from the patients who participated in our study, as in all implant patients, during the pre-surgical planning phase and after implant placement. With the control periapical radiographs to be taken as a result of one-year follow-up, the marginal bone loss amount in the implants will be evaluated using soft-ware. Clinical measurements will be taken in all patients at the prosthetic loading session and 1 year after loading.
Immediate implant placement has been advantageous in terms of reduced treatment time and fewer surgical interventions. Given the fact that the level of buccal bone acts as a major prognostic factor for IIP, the indications for immediate implant placement were suggested to be limited to intact alveolar sockets.In recent years, many attempts have been performed to compensate for the alveolar ridge resorption in immediate implant placement in compromised sockets. The clinical outcomes of IIP with guided tissue regeneration and connective tissue grafting using papilla preservation technique in compromised extraction sockets has not been previously reported.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate in a cohort of patients with peri-implant mucositis: (a) the efficacy of professional mechanical debridement therapy assisted using Bioptron Hyperlight Therapy on the reduction of periodontal indexes (b) the reduction of total oxidative salivary stress. Material and Methods Forty subjects with a diagnosis of peri-implant mucositis were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to the study group (mechanical debridement therapy assisted using Bioptron Hyperlight Therapy) or control group (mechanical debridement therapy alone). The study duration was 6 months. Data on plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BoP), probing pocket depth (PPD) and pain relief on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were recorded at T0, T1 (14 days), T2 (1 month) and T3 (6 months). Group differences were assessed using Student's t-test and Pearson's Chi-squared test of homogeneity
After a single-tooth extraction, physiological remodeling processes are unavoidable which leads to a total loss of the periodontal ligament and resorption of the bundle bone. Immediate implant placement associated with bone substitutes and customized healing abutments seems to reduce the amount of resorption at peri-implant areas. Recently, studies evaluating the use of a connective tissue grafts are being conducted in order to assess possible final outcome advantages in immediate implant procedures. This study aims to evaluate peri-implant tissue dimensional changes after the use of a customized healing abutment with or without connective tissue graft in flapless maxillary immediate implant placement.
patients were randomly divided into Maxi-Z plus dental implant group versus Maxi-Z implant group
Regional oral and maxillofacial defects secondary to ablative tissue resection can contribute to severe aesthetic and functional loss, which influences patients' regular life and may cause psychological problems. Microvascular free flaps are considered the gold standard for reconstructing large oral and maxillofacial defects. In the past decade, with the help of computer-aided design (CAD)/ computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) customized implants and prosthesis (CIP) have led to a significant improvement of the operative accuracy, improve the flap survival rate and enhance the patients' quality of life. Concerning the increased overall survival rate of the patients, people pay more attention to the quality of life and aesthetic appearance which are influenced by the fitness and compatibility of the CIP. However, from literature reviews, the evaluation was various to be concluded in some certain conditions from pooled studies.
To assess the influence that the complications of implant treatment have on the patient's perception and satisfaction on treatment.
immediate implant placement using the VST was compared to early implant placement protocol using Buser's technique regarding implant survival, changes in labial plate thickness and soft tissue height after 1 year of implant placement
Subjects who underwent a dental implant surgery were studied.Subjects randomly were aligned into three groups:In group 1, subjects received prophylactic antibiotic orally (Amoxicillin 2mg ,1 hour before surgery) and post-surgical antibiotic (Amoxicillin 500 mg , q8h for five days), subjects received only prophylactic antibiotic (Amoxicillin 2mg ,1 hour before surgery) in group 2 ,and in group 3, subjects received post-surgical antibiotic (Amoxicillin 500 mg , q8h for five days). The sign and symptom of infection were studied and the incidence of infection in each group was determined.