Follow-Up Study of CARTISTEM® Versus Microfracture for the Treatment of Knee Articular Cartilage Injury or Defect

Degenerative Osteoarthritis Clinical Trial

Official title:

Long Term Follow-Up Study of CARTISTEM® Versus Microfracture for the Treatment of Knee

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01626677
• Other study ID #: CARTISTEM_CR_F/U
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• First received: June 19, 2012
• Last updated: April 19, 2017
• Start date: June 2012
• Est. completion date: May 2015

Study information

• Verified date: April 2017
• Source: Medipost Co Ltd.
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a long term follow-up study to investigate the safety and efficacy of CARTISTEM®, human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells, in repair of cartilage injury or defects, compared with microfracture. Subjects who participated in and completed the Phase III trial (NCT01041001) will be tracked until the 60 month post-treatment timepoint.

Description:

This long term follow-up study is performed to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of CARTISTEM®, human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells, in repair of cartilage injury or defects, compared with microfracture. Subjects, who were either administered CARTISTEM or treated with conventional microfracture in the primary phase III study (NCT01041001), will be further observed using various subjective knee assessments and MRI T2 mapping until the 60 month post-treatment timepoint.

Other known NCT identifiers

• NCT01923532

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 103
• Est. completion date: May 2015
• Est. primary completion date: May 2015
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients with knee joint cartilage defect or injury of ICRS (International Cartilage Repair Society) Grade 4 confirmed by arthroscopy (At screening, patients diagnosed as such with an MRI may be included)

• Male or female patients at least 18 years of age

• Patients whose lesion (unilateral joint) is 2 ? ~ 9? in size

• Patients with articular swelling, tenderness and active range of motion of Grade 2 or below

• Patients with pain in affected joint of 60-mm or below on a 100-mm VAS (visual analogue scale)

• Patients with adequate blood coagulation activity: PT(INR) < 1.5, APTT <1.5×control

• Patients with adequate renal function: Creatinine = 2.0 ?/?, levels of proteinuria measured with Dipstick: trace or less

• Patients with adequate hepatic function: Bilirubin = 2.0 ?/?, AST/ALT = 100 IU/L

• Patients who have received no surgery or radiation therapy in the affected joint within the past 6 six weeks, and have recovered from the side effects of such past treatments

• Female patients of childbearing potential must agree to practice adequate methods of birth control to prevent pregnancy during the study

• Patients whose physical examination results show no ligament instability of Grade II or above (Grade 0: none, Grade I: 0-5 mm, Grade II: 5-10 mm, Grade III: >10 mm)

• Patients who voluntarily agreed to enroll in the study and signed an informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with autoimmune disease or the medical history

• Patients with infections requiring parenteral administration of antibiotics

• Patients with myocardial infarction, ischemic heart failure, other serious heart conditions or uncontrolled hypertension, or any medical history of such diseases

• Patients with serious internal diseases

• Patients who are currently pregnant or nursing

• Patients with psychotic diseases, epilepsy, or any history of such diseases

• Patients with alcohol abuse

• Patients who smoke excessively

• Patients with chronic inflammatory articular diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis

• Patients who were enrolled in any other clinical trials within the past four weeks

• Patients who had been administered with immunosuppressants such as Cyclosporin A or azathioprine within the past six weeks

• Patients whose physical examination results show ligament instability of Grade II or above (Grade 0: none, Grade I: 0-5 mm, Grade II: 5-10 mm, Grade III: >10 mm)

• Patients with a known history of hypersensitivity/allergy to gentamicin

• Patients whom the principal investigator considers inappropriate for the clinical trial due to any other reasons than those listed above

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Cartilage Diseases
• Defect of Articular Cartilage
• Degenerative Osteoarthritis
• Osteoarthritis

Intervention

Biological:
• CARTISTEM
A single dose of 500?/? of cartilage defect

Procedure:
• Microfracture
Active control

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Korea, Republic of	Gachon University Gil Hospital	Incheon
Korea, Republic of	Inha University Hospital	Incheon
Korea, Republic of	Asan Medical Center	Seoul
Korea, Republic of	Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital	Seoul
Korea, Republic of	Gangnam Severance Hospital	Seoul
Korea, Republic of	Hanyang University Medical Center	Seoul
Korea, Republic of	Kangbuk Samsung Hospital	Seoul
Korea, Republic of	Korea University Guro Hospital	Seoul
Korea, Republic of	Samsung Medical Center	Seoul
Korea, Republic of	Seoul Veterans Hospital	Seoul

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Medipost Co Ltd.	Dong-A Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Korea, Republic of, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Degree of improvement in knee assessments compared to the active control (microfracture)	Knee assessments will be performed using the following tools: IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee); Pain score on VAS (Visual Analogue Scale); WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index)	36 months, 48 months, and 60 months
Secondary	Number of subjects with adverse events	Systemic and local adverse events especially attributable to the implanted cells will be assessed.; General physical examinations: vital signs, blood tests; Physical assessments of the knee: swelling, tenderness, pain, range of motion; Tumor formation at the implantation site: radiological evaluation using MRI(T1(dGEMRIC)and T2 mapping)	36 months, 48 months, and 60 months

External Links

•   Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Cartistem® and Microfracture in Patients With Knee Articular Cartilage Injury or Defect