View clinical trials related to Decision Support Techniques.
Filter by:This study will evaluate whether patients and their providers benefit from an evidence-based decision tool to help prioritize preventive (and select chronic disease management) services based on their potential to improve quality-adjusted life expectancy, individualized for patient risk factors. The study seeks to enroll 600 patients and 60 primary care providers. Half of providers will be assigned to an intervention to utilize the decision tool with approximately 10 high-priority patients each (patients of particular interest to the research study, on whom follow-up outcomes will be collected), and half will be assigned to usual care. Surveys will be administered at baseline and approximately 6 months later; electronic health records data on preventive service utilization will be collected; and optional qualitative interviews may be conducted.
The objective of this study is an approach to derive and use decision-thresholds for judgments on health benefits and harms using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks.
The purpose of this study is to test the effect of the "Best Case/Worse Case" (BC/WC) communication tool on receipt of palliative care and intensity of treatment at the end of life, quality of life, and quality of communication for older patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving outpatient care at ten nephrology clinics. The intervention was developed and tested with acute care surgical patients at the University of Wisconsin (UW) and is now being testing to see if the intervention will work in a different setting. The intervention will be tested with 320 older adults who have end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and are receiving care from a nephrologist enrolled in the study. Randomly assigned nephrologists within each site will receive the intervention (training to use the BC/WC tool) or to be in the waitlist control, meaning that they will not be offered BC/WC training until the end of the study, when all participants have been enrolled. Participants will be on follow up with surveys and chart review for up to two years after study enrollment. Caregivers will also be invited to participate and complete surveys.
This online randomized controlled trial seeks to determine if inclusion of incidental findings information in a lung cancer screening decision aid affects screening intent among screening-eligible individuals. Participants will view either a decision aid with incidental findings information or without and indicate their intent to pursue lung cancer screening. Hypothesis: Inclusion of incidental findings in a decision aid will decrease intent to screen among participants.
This study is an online survey to assess risk literacy among students of the medical and dentistry faculties in Portugal. Risk literacy is the capability to understand and interpret statistical information, based on simple rules of thumb. The investigators assess the level of "medical risk literacy" among Portuguese medical and dentistry students with the Quick Risk Test (QRT) and the multiple choice version of the Berlin Numeracy Test (BNT).
Febrile infants younger than 3 months old present a diagnostic dilemma to the emergency physician. Tension remains between the need for early aggressive intervention among patients with suspected sepsis and the global phenomena of increasing antibiotic resistance. The investigators aim to: (1) To study the association between heart rate variability (HRV) and the presence of a serious infection (SI) among infants younger than 3 months old. The investigators hypothesize that a reduced HRV is associated with the presence of SI. (2) To compare HRV between febrile infants < 3 months with non-febrile infants. The investigators hypothesize that the variability will be reduced in febrile infants with SIs when compared to non-febrile well infants, but not among febrile infants without SIs when compared to non-febrile well infants. (3) To study if HRV will provide incremental diagnostic information over current triage tools.
Fertility is of great importance to young women with cancer. Concerns about the ability to become pregnant after cancer treatment may influence treatment decisions and fertility decision-making is challenging. Despite these challenges, there is a lack of fertility decision support tools. Our team developed the Begin Exploring Fertility Options, Risks and Expectations (BEFORE) decision aid for young breast cancer patients in Canada. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the BEFORE decision aid in hospital settings through a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.
Prostate cancer is a commonly diagnosed cancer, and is the second leading cause of cancer deaths among men in the U.S. The subgroup of men with advanced prostate cancer is particularly vulnerable to difficult choices for treatment because of the nature of their disease and having limited options. This study will test the use of an innovative Registered Nurse-Community Patient Navigator team delivered interactive mHealth decision aid for patients with advanced prostate cancer to help facilitate informed shared decisions about anti-cancer treatment that affects their quality of life.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the effect of the decision aid on measures of decision-making such as knowledge, screening attitudes, decisional conflict, and screening intent.
The investigators propose an evaluation of an end of life patient decision aid (EOL-PtDA) developed by the Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making using the RE-AIM (Reach Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework. To evaluate the Reach and Effectiveness, the investigators propose a pilot randomized clinical trial of the EOL-PtDA among patients on the inpatient palliative care service at University Hospital in Colorado. To evaluate barriers and facilitators of Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance of the EOL-PtDA, we propose focus groups of non-palliative care physicians as we perceive these physicians to be the largest barrier to ultimate adoption of the EOL-PtDA. Additionally we propose a focus group of the palliative care physicians who participated in the implementation of this decision guide study to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized control trial within a pall. care service and to evaluate the acceptability of this decision aid as it was implemented. The investigators also propose to conduct focus groups of normal, healthy clinic patients to determine the acceptability among that population. The End-of-Life decision aid is different from other decision aids. From the vantage point of decision quality, a major difference is that its primary focus is on helping patients clarify their values rather than gain knowledge. The results from this study will provide critical preliminary data to inform a randomized clinical trial and/or widespread implementation of the EOL-PtDA. Specific Aims/Research question(s):Aim 1: To determine the Reach and Effectiveness of an end-of-life patient decision aid by conducting a pilot randomized clinical trial in an inpatient palliative care service. Aim 2: To determine physicians' attitudes towards the end-of-life patient decision aid and to gain insights into potential barriers and facilitators to Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance by conducting a qualitative study of non-palliative care, and separately, palliative care physicians. Aim 3: To determine healthy clinic patients' attitudes towards the end-of-life patient decision aid and to gain insight into its Reach and Effectiveness.