View clinical trials related to Deafness.
Filter by:The main questions the research aims to answer are short- and long-term effects on consequences of hearing loss depending on which type of follow-up the participant chooses.
Recognition of speech sounds is accomplished through the use of adjacent sounds in time, in what is termed acoustic context. The frequency and temporal properties of these contextual sounds play a large role in recognition of human speech. Historically, most research on both speech perception and sound perception in general examine sounds out-of-context, or presented individually. Further, these studies have been conducted independently of each other with little connection across labs, across sounds, etc. These approaches slow the progress in understanding how listeners with hearing difficulties use context to recognize speech and how their hearing aids and/or cochlear implants might be modified to improve their perception. This research has three main goals. First, the investigators predict that performance in speech sound recognition experiments will be related when testing the same speech frequencies or the same moments in time, but that performance will not be related in further comparisons across speech frequencies or at different moments in time. Second, the investigators predict that adding background noise will make this contextual speech perception more difficult, and that these difficulties will be more severe for listeners with hearing loss. Third, the investigators predict that cochlear implant users will also use surrounding sounds in their speech recognition, but with key differences than healthy-hearing listeners owing to the sound processing done by their implants. In tandem with these goals, the investigators will use computer models to simulate how neurons respond to speech sounds individually and when surrounded by other sounds.
DTI and auditory tractography can be incorporated into the diagnostic toolkit for patients who are scheduled to undergo cochlear implantation and whose standard assessments have been unable to determine the functional integrity of the auditory pathway. These techniques aid in decision-making processes regarding potential outcomes, determining the optimal side for implantation, providing counseling regarding the possibility of limited benefits from surgery, and considering alternative forms of rehabilitation. The investigators including patients with varying degrees of hearing loss, as well as patients with normal radiological findings who are scheduled for cochlear implantation. The ultimate goal is to create a comprehensive map across the entire hearing spectrum and validate the findings of this study..
The need for future hearing rehabilitation is enormous. World Health Organization (WHO 2021) has estimated that by 2050, 2.5 billion people will have some degree of hearing loss, and 1/4 of them will require hearing rehabilitation. Currently, healthcare systems and processes are already overwhelmed and not adequately equipped to screen and diagnose this rapidly growing population suffering from hearing impairment. This study aims to investigate if the diagnostics of age-related hearing loss can be accelerated by involving patients in the hearing assessment process.
Hearing loss is one of the most prevalent impairments in the world. The World Health Organization estimates that as of 2020, around 466 million people worldwide are affected by disabling hearing loss, of which 34 million are children. Without appropriate diagnosis and treatment, hearing impairment can cause difficulties with communication, learning, social-emotional functioning, employment and quality of life. Early intervention is especially important for children, for whom unaddressed hearing loss has been proven to affect speech and language development, educational attainments, and social skills. Through early detection and interventions many of these impacts can be mitigated, highlighting the importance of accurate hearing diagnostics. Evaluation of speech intelligibility is a fundamental component of hearing assessment and rehabilitation. The current gold standard in measuring speech intelligibility relies heavily on behavioural tests. While these tests are reliable and fast in healthy adults, it is challenging to assess speech intelligibility for patients who cannot communicate clearly, such as young children. For example, behavioral tests require active participation from the patient, such as raising their hand when a sound is heard, or repeating words and sentences. Objective measures, for instance using electro-encephalography (EEG), could overcome the current challenges in hearing assessment and do not require active participation from the patient. For example, in Flanders, all newborns are screened with an objective test where a few sensors on the head detect brainwaves in response to sounds. However, objective tests only use simple sound stimuli, such as tones or clicks, which cannot be used to measure important high-level hearing outcomes, such as speech understanding. In other words, current objective tests are used to check if a person can hear a word, but they can't indicate if the person can understand the word. An obvious missing link in audiological practice is a diagnostic test that can measure high-level hearing outcomes such as speech understanding in an objective way. For this reason, CORGEE was developed. CORGEE uses a novel method of "neural speech tracking" to objectively measure speech intelligibility using EEG. In the current study, the efficacy and the clinical validity of the CORGEE software will be evaluated in young children with a hearing impairment.
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a screening test for detecting cognitive impairment that assesses several cognitive domains (attention and concentration, arithmetic and orientation, memory, etc.). The instructions as well as some test items of the MoCA are presented auditory (spoken). Consequently, performance on the MoCA may be co-dependent on hearing. Therefore, to rule out the possible negative influence of hearing loss on performance on the MoCA, a MoCA for individuals with hearing loss was recently developed. More specifically, the original MoCA was modified by providing the instructions audiovisually (spoken with visual support) as well as by replacing hearing-dependent items. Since replacing items may affect sensitivity and specificity, the MoCA for persons with hearing loss should be revalidated.
The results of the previous study on auditory effort in young children with cochlear implants show that pupils respond to the presence or the absence of the perceived stimuli. The investigators hypothesize that the perceived sounds will elicit increased pupil dilation compared to the non-perceived sounds and that the hearing threshold as measured with pure tone audiometry will correlate to the results in pupillometry test. The investigators hypothesize that the effect will be visible in all testing groups albeit the relative increase of pupil size with age. Hypothesis confirmed, the investigators will develop a standardised procedure for the auditory signal detection using pupillometry. Such a procedure could represent an important bridge between automatic and behavioral hearing tests. With a more precise test of auditory threshold of young children, post-operative monitoring and fitting of cochlear implants or hearing aids, and rehabilitation procedures, could be considerably more targeted and consequentially more efficient.
This study aims to investigate the effect of stimulation parameters and different electrode modes on speech perception in adult cochlear implant recipients.
Evaluation of the diagnostic and prognostic efficacy of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute sensorineural hearing loss or in patients suffering from probable or definite MD. The neuroradiological and audiological evaluation are held on in the same day in order to better clarify the radiological and clinical correlates.
The goal of this 2 step-up, exploratory study is to test safey, tolerability and PK/PD profiles in healthy volunteers and safety, tolerability and efficacy in sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients as an early salvage therapy. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. whether is it safe and tolerable when healthy volunteers and sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients take multiple doses of NS101 against FAM19A5 2. whether is it effective in reversing hearing capability in sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients who fails to show sufficient recovery despite of oral standard steroid therapy. Patients and heathly volunteers will be given NS101 15mg/kg or 30mg/kg systemically less than 3 months per protocol. This is placebo controlled, double blinded study, which means there will be a group who receives placebo (i.e. fake drug) for study purpose.