Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00466817
Other study ID # 06-0046
Secondary ID CASG 112
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received April 26, 2007
Last updated August 13, 2015
Start date June 2008
Est. completion date June 2013

Study information

Verified date July 2015
Source National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is known to cause hearing loss and mental retardation. The purpose of this study is to compare a 6-week course to a 6-month course of the drug valganciclovir in babies born with CMV to assess the safety and efficacy of this treatment. Participants will include 104 infants (30 days old or younger) born with CMV disease. All infants will take valganciclovir by mouth for 6 weeks. At the end of the 6 week period, subjects will be assigned by chance to receive either valganciclovir or placebo (inactive substance) to complete the 6 months of antiviral treatment. Patients will be followed for the study related evaluations of safety, changes to hearing, and developmental milestones for up to 2 years. Patients will be followed by telephone contact for an additional 3 years. Thus, participants may be involved in study related procedures for approximately 5 years.


Description:

This study is a multi-center, prospective, international, Phase III, randomized and blinded investigation of 6 weeks versus 6 months of oral valganciclovir therapy in babies with symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. Following enrollment, study subjects will receive 6 weeks of oral valganciclovir. Near the end of the 6-week course, subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion either to continue on valganciclovir to complete 6 months of therapy or to begin a matching placebo to complete the 6 months. Study subjects will be stratified according to whether or not there is central nervous system (CNS) involvement at study entry. During the 6-month treatment period and the 1 month thereafter, study subjects will be followed weekly for 4 weeks, then every other week for 8 weeks, then every month for 4 months. At each of these visits, safety labs will be checked, growth parameters recorded, and adverse events assessed. The dose of study medication will be adjusted for weight gain at each of these study visits. Dose adjustments may also occur as indicated per protocol for neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, or renal impairment. Whole blood will be obtained for CMV viral load at each of these visits as well. Hearing outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. Developmental outcomes will be assessed at 12 months and 24 months. Changes in whole blood viral load measurements will be correlated with both hearing and neurologic outcomes. In study subjects with increasing whole blood viral loads during the course of treatment, assessment for antiviral resistance may be undertaken.Safety assessments include: hematology labs, chemistry labs, physical examinations, and adverse event data performed/collected serially. Development of neutropenia will be confirmed by repeat blood testing within one week, and study drug will be held until it resolves. Efficacy assessments include: hearing assessments at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months; and neurodevelopmental assessments at 12 months and 24 months. Study objectives are: to compare the impact on hearing outcomes of 6 weeks versus 6 months of antiviral treatment with valganciclovir oral solution in infants with symptomatic congenital CMV disease; to compare the safety profile of 6 weeks versus 6 months of antiviral therapy with valganciclovir oral solution in infants with symptomatic congenital CMV disease; to compare the impact on neurologic outcomes of 6 weeks versus 6 months of antiviral treatment with valganciclovir oral solution in infants with symptomatic congenital CMV disease; and to correlate change in whole blood viral load with hearing and neurologic outcomes. Participants will include 104 male and female neonates (less than or equal to 30 days) with symptomatic congenital CMV.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 109
Est. completion date June 2013
Est. primary completion date December 2011
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group N/A to 30 Days
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Signed informed consent from parent(s) or legal guardian(s)

- Confirmation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) from urine or throat swab specimens by culture, shell vial, or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests

- Symptomatic congenital CMV disease, as manifest by one or more of the following:

1. Thrombocytopenia

2. Petechiae

3. Hepatomegaly

4. Splenomegaly

5. Intrauterine growth restriction

6. Hepatitis (elevated transaminases and/or bilirubin)

7. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement of the CMV disease [such as microcephaly, radiographic abnormalities indicative of CMV CNS disease, abnormal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) indices for age, chorioretinitis, hearing deficits as detected by formal brainstem evoked response (not a screening auditory brainstem response {ABR}), and/or positive CMV PCR from CSF]

- Less than or equal to 30 days of age at study enrollment

- Weight at study enrollment greater than or equal to 1800 grams

- Gestational age greater than or equal to 32 weeks at birth

Exclusion Criteria:

- Imminent demise

- Patients receiving other antiviral agents or immune globulin

- Gastrointestinal abnormality which might preclude absorption of an oral medication (e.g., a history of necrotizing enterocolitis)

- Documented renal insufficiency, as noted by a creatinine clearance less than 10 mL/min/1.73m^2 at time of study enrollment

- Breastfeeding from mother who is receiving ganciclovir, valganciclovir, foscarnet, cidofovir, or maribivir

- Infants known to be born to women who are human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive (but HIV testing is not required for study entry)

- Current receipt of other investigational drugs

Study Design


Intervention

Other:
Placebo
9 grams of powder which contains no Valganciclovir free base. The oral solution formulation comprises the following excipients: mannitol, lactose anhydrous, fumaric acid, sodium benzoate, saccharin sodium, flavor, and purified water.
Drug:
Valganciclovir
Mono-valyl ester pro-drug of ganciclovir, oral solution, provided as a 12 grams of powder containing 5 grams of Valganciclovir free base. The oral solution formulation comprises the following excipients: Providone K30, fumaric acid, sodium benzoate, sodium saccharin, mannitol, flavor, and purified water.

Locations

Country Name City State
United Kingdom Birmingham Heartlands Hospital Birmingham
United Kingdom Bristol Royal Hospital for Children - UBHT Education Centre Bristol Bristol, City of
United Kingdom Alder Hey Childrens Hospital Liverpool
United Kingdom Saint George's Hospital - Pediatric Infectious Diseases London London, City of
United Kingdom University College London - Royal Free Campus - Virology London London, City of
United Kingdom Newcastle General Hospital Newcastle Upon Tyne
United Kingdom John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford Oxfordshire
United States Emory Children's Center - Pediatric Infectious Diseases Atlanta Georgia
United States Children's Hospital Colorado - Infectious Disease Aurora Colorado
United States Johns Hopkins Children's Center - Pediatric Infectious Diseases Baltimore Maryland
United States University of Alabama - Children's of Alabama - Clinical Virology Birmingham Alabama
United States Children's Hospital Boston - Infectious Diseases Boston Massachusetts
United States Women & Children's Hospital of Buffalo - Infectious Diseases Buffalo New York
United States Medical University of South Carolina - Pediatrics - Infectious Diseases Charleston South Carolina
United States Carolinas Medical Center - Pediatrics - Infectious Diseases Charlotte North Carolina
United States Cleveland Clinic Main Campus - Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases Cleveland Ohio
United States MetroHealth Medical Center - Pediatric Infectious Disease Cleveland Ohio
United States Nationwide Children's Hospital - Infectious Diseases Columbus Ohio
United States Children's Medical Center Dallas - Neonatal ICU Dallas Texas
United States University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center - Pediatrics Dallas Texas
United States Cook Children's Infectious Disease Services Fort Worth Texas
United States University of Mississippi - Children's Infectious Diseases Jackson Mississippi
United States University of Florida - College of Medicine - Jacksonville Jacksonville Florida
United States Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics - Infectious Diseases Kansas City Missouri
United States Arkansas Children's Hospital - Infectious Diseases Little Rock Arkansas
United States Los Angeles County - University of Southern California - Medical Center - Pediatrics Los Angeles California
United States Plaza Towers Obstetrics and Gynecology Los Angeles California
United States University of Louisville School of Medicine - Kosair Childrens Hospital - Infectious Diseases Louisville Kentucky
United States Cohen Children's Medical Center - Pediatric Infectious Diseases Manhasset New York
United States University of Minnesota - Pediatric Infectious Disease Minneapolis Minnesota
United States University of South Alabama - Children's Specialty Clinic Mobile Alabama
United States Vanderbilt University - Pediatric - Infectious Diseases Nashville Tennessee
United States Childrens Hospital at Saint Peters University Hospital - Allergy, Immunology and Infectious Diseases New Brunswick New Jersey
United States Robert Wood Johnson Medical School - Pediatrics New Brunswick New Jersey
United States Tulane University - Tulane Medical Center - Pediatrics New Orleans Louisiana
United States Creighton University Medical Center - Medicine - Infectious Diseases Omaha Nebraska
United States Children's Hospital of Orange County - Infectious Diseases Orange California
United States Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC - Pediatric Infectious Diseases Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
United States Rhode Island Hospital - Pediatrics Providence Rhode Island
United States University of Rochester Medical Center - Golisano Children's Hospital - Infectious Diseases Rochester New York
United States Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis - Center for Clinical Studies Saint Louis Missouri
United States University of Utah - Pediatric Pharmacology Program Salt Lake City Utah
United States Seattle Children's Hospital - Infectious Diseases Seattle Washington
United States Louisiana State University Health Shreveport - Pediatrics Shreveport Louisiana
United States Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California
United States SUNY Upstate Medical University Hospital - Pediatrics Syracuse New York
United States University of South Florida - Tampa General Hospital - Pediatrics Tampa Florida
United States Children's National Medical Center - Sheikh Zayed Campus - Infectious Disease Washington District of Columbia

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change in Best Ear Hearing Assessments at 6 Months. Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 6 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss. Between baseline and 6 months
Secondary Adverse Events Which Lead to Permanent Discontinuation of Valganciclovir Therapy or Lead to Irreversible Outcome of the Adverse Event. Adverse events were assessed at each visit through month 7 of the study. No subject discontinued valganciclovir therapy due to permanent discontinuation of valganciclovir therapy or lead to irreversible outcome of any adverse event. baseline through 7 months
Secondary Change in Best Ear Hearing Assessments at 12 Months. Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 12 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss. Between baseline and 12 months
Secondary Change in Best Ear Hearing Assessments at 24 Months. Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 24 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss. Between baseline and 24 months
Secondary Number of Ears With Improvement or Protected Hearing in Hearing Assessments Over Left and Right Ears at 6 Months.(Based on 84 Ears From 43 Placebo Subjects and 82 Ears From 43 Valganciclovir Subjects) Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 6 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss. Between baseline and 6 months
Secondary Number of Ears With Improvement or Protected Hearing in Hearing Assessments Over Left and Right Ears at 12 Months.(Based on 77 Ears From 40 Placebo Subjects and 79 Ears From 41 Valganciclovir Subjects) Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 12 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss. Between baseline and 12 months
Secondary Number of Ears With Improvement or Protected Hearing Assessments Over Left and Right Ears at 24 Months.(Based on 58 Ears From 31 Placebo Subjects and 70 Ears From 37 Valganciclovir Subjects) Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 24 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss. Between baseline and 24 months
Secondary Number of Ears With Hearing Deterioration Over Left and Right Ears at 6 Months.(Based on 84 Ears From 43 Placebo Subjects and 82 Ears From 43 Valganciclovir Subjects) Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 6 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss. Between baseline and 6 months
Secondary Number of Ears With Hearing Deterioration Over Left and Right Ears at 12 Months.(Based on 77 Ears From 40 Placebo Subjects and 79 Ears From 41 Valganciclovir Subjects) Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 12 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss. Between baseline and 12 months
Secondary Number of Ears With Hearing Deterioration Over Left and Right Ears at 24 Months.(Based on 58 Ears From 31 Placebo Subjects and 70 Ears From 37 Valganciclovir Subjects) Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 24 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss. Between baseline and 24 months
Secondary Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Cognitive Composite Score). Cognitive Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor cognitive skills) and 160 (excellent cognitive skills), with the average cogonitive skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15. 12 Months after enrollment
Secondary Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Age Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Receptive Communication Scaled Score). Receptive Communication Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor receptive communication skills) and 19 (excellent receptive communication skills), with the average receptive communication skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3. 12 Months after enrollment
Secondary Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Age Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Expressive Communication Scaled Score). Expressive Communication Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor expressive communication skills) and 19 (excellent expressive communication skills), with the average expressive communication skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3. 12 Months after enrollment
Secondary Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Language Composite Score). Language Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor language skills) and 160 (excellent language skills), with the average language skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15. 12 Months after enrollment
Secondary Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Fine Motor Scaled Score). Fine Motor Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor fine motor skills) and 19 (excellent fine motor skills), with the average fine motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3. 12 Months after enrollment
Secondary Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Gross Motor Scaled Score). Gross Motor Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor gross motor skills) and 19 (excellent gross motor skills), with the average gross motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3. 12 Months after enrollment
Secondary Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Motor Composite Score). Motor Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor motor skills) and 160 (excellent motor skills), with the average motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15. 12 Months after enrollment
Secondary Neurological Impairment at 24 Months Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Receptive Communication Scaled Score). Receptive Communication Scaled score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor receptive communication skills) and 19 (excellent receptive communication skills), with the average receptive communication skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3. 24 Months after enrollment
Secondary Neurological Impairment at 24 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Cognitive Composite Score). Cognitive Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores are between 40 (very poor cognitive skills) and 160 (excellent cognitive skills), with the average cognitive skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15. 24 months after enrollment
Secondary Neurological Impairment at 24 Months of Life, Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Expressive Communication Scaled Score). Expressive Communication Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor expressive communication skills) and 19 (excellent expressive communication skills), with the average expressive communication skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3. 24 Months after enrollment
Secondary Neurologic Impairment at 24 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Language Composite Score). Language Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor language skills) and 160 (excellent language skills), with the average language skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15. 24 Months after enrollment
Secondary Neurological Impairment at 24 Months, Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Fine Motor Scaled Score). Fine motor scaled score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor fine motor skills) and 19 (excellent fine motor skills), with the average fine motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3. 24 Months after enrollment
Secondary Neurological Impairment at 24 Months of Life, Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Gross Motor Scaled Score). Gross motor scaled score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring is between 1 (very poor gross motor skills) and 19 (excellent gross motor skills), with the average gross motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3. 24 Months after enrollment.
Secondary Neurological Impairment at 24 Months of Life, Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Motor Composite Score). Motor composite score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor motor skills) and 160 (excellent motor skills), with the average motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15. 24 Months after enrollment
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT00023036 - Clinical and Genetic Analysis of Enlarged Vestibular Aqueducts
Terminated NCT01037712 - In UTERO Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Congenital Infection With Valacyclovir Phase 4
Completed NCT00370006 - Phase 1 Trial of CMV Towne Vaccine in Subjects Previously Received VCL CT02 Vaccine ID or IM Phase 1
Completed NCT01588015 - Vaccine Therapy in Preventing Cytomegalovirus Infection in Patients With Hematological Malignancies Undergoing Donor Stem Cell Transplant Phase 1
Completed NCT01552369 - CMV Antiviral Prevention Strategies in D+R-Liver Transplants ("CAPSIL") Phase 4
Completed NCT00223925 - Maribavir for Prevention of CMV After Stem Cell Transplants Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT05085366 - A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1647 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Vaccine in Healthy Participants 16 to 40 Years of Age Phase 3
Completed NCT01220895 - Alternate Donor Study of Pre-Emptive Cellular Therapy Phase 2
Completed NCT00942305 - Study of CMX001 to Prevent/Control Cytomegalovirus Infection in R+ Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients Phase 2
Completed NCT00373412 - Trial of pDNA CMV Vaccine (VCL-CT02) Followed by Towne CMV Vaccine (Towne) Challenge Phase 1
Completed NCT05105048 - A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Vaccine mRNA-1647 Phase 1
Completed NCT00386412 - TAMOVALCIR in Allogenic Hematopoietic Progenitors Transplant Phase 2
Completed NCT03382405 - Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of Cytomegalovirus Vaccines mRNA-1647 and mRNA-1443 in Healthy Adults Phase 1
Completed NCT02454699 - Safety and PK of MBX-400 (Cyclopropavir) in Normal Volunteers Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT03910478 - Dried Blood Spot Testing of CMV Detection in HCT Recipients N/A
Completed NCT01354301 - Efficacy and Safety of Induction Strategies Combined With Low Tacrolimus Exposure in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus or Sodium Mycophenolate Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT01473849 - Impact of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Replication Over Hepatitis C Recurrence in Liver Transplant Recipients N/A
Completed NCT00880789 - Safety, Toxicity and MTD of One Intravenous IV Injection of Donor CTLs Specific for CMV and Adenovirus Phase 1
Completed NCT00817908 - Quantiferon - Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and the Prediction of CMV Infection In High Risk Solid Organ Transplant Recipients N/A
Completed NCT00273143 - A Trial to Study How the Body Fights Off Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in Hematopoietic Transplant Recipients. Phase 1