Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04592367 |
Other study ID # |
PRO-4ACL |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
January 1, 2005 |
Est. completion date |
December 31, 2018 |
Study information
Verified date |
October 2020 |
Source |
Region Zealand |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational [Patient Registry]
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of primary ACL-R in patients 30 years of
age or older using PRO. The PRO used are Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score(KOOS) and Tegner
score. The Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry has data including more than 31,000
primary ACL-R performed in the period from 2005 to 2018, of which approximately a little less
than 40% are performed in patients 30 years or older.
Traditionally, ACL-R has been used for the active, younger patients with the purpose of
returning to their pre-injury level of activity. The increasing activity level and the desire
to stay active among some patients in their fourth decade, and later, possibly increases the
demands of the reconstructed ACL in this group. The aim is to investigate the PRO in this
group of patients and compare them with the PRO of patients younger than 30 years of age. The
study may help orthopedic surgeons counselling patients 30 years of age or older when
deciding to perform an ACL-R.
The study's hypothesis is, that the overall benefit from ACL-R is equal but the patients 30
years of age or older has a worse baseline and as an implication of that worse PRO one year
after the ACL-R.
Description:
Quality Assurance Plan: Clinical data reported by orthopedic surgeons at public and private
hospitals, while patients undergoing ACL-R report PRO.
Source Data Verification with the Danish National Central Person Registry. Degree of
completeness compared to Central Person Registry is approximately 85%.
Data dictionary provided by the data manager at RKKP - "Regionernes Kliniske
Kvalitetudviklingsprogram" - Regional Clinical Quality Development Program. Patients are
recruited when the ACL-R is performed, and approximately 35% report PRO 1 year after surgery.
Data collection, data management and the extract from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction
Registry is performed by the Regional Clinical Quality Development Program. Data analysis
done with support from statistician from "Region Sjælland" - Region Zealand. Sample Size
Assessment not done. The cohort size is the largest we can get from the registry. The
estimated number of patients 30 years of age or older with complete PROs is 2,600 men and
1,600 women. This estimation is based on the numbers from the annual report of 2019 from the
Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Register, which states that 7,368 men and 4,656 women 30
years of age or older has undergone the procedure from 2005-2018. We expect that they report
PROs as frequently as the entire cohort, which is approximately 35%. Patients with missing
data will be described in table 3 and not used in table 2.
The study will present five tables.
Flowchart: Cohort size, excluded patients, patients with missing values, patients in each age
group
Table 1: Descriptive statistics of the cohort with reported PRO stratified in three strata
(0-14 years of age, 15-29 years of age or 30 years of age or older) with information about
gender, age, previous surgery in the knee, activity at time of injury, operational technique
and cartilage and meniscal status.
Table 2: Unpaired t-test if data shows normal distribution, otherwise Mann-Whitney, by change
in KOOS from before surgery to one year after surgery, overall KOOS one year after surgery,
Tegner one year after surgery, and Tegner from preoperatively to one year after surgery
Table 3: Descriptive statistics of population lost during follow-up
Table 4: Multivariate analysis for primary outcome
Sampling Method: Consecutive patients. Patients are enrolled into the registry when the ACL-R
is performed. The completeness of registry depends on physicians' reporting of pre-, intra-
and postoperative findings and patients' reporting of PROs.