View clinical trials related to Critical Pathways.
Filter by:The main objective of this study is to analyze the impact on five years survival of an enhanced recovery program (PRI) after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. As secondaries objectives, we propose to analyze comparing survival distributions between patient groups (ERAS/no ERAS) and the relationship between the ERAS program and early incorporation into oncology therapies (RIOT). It is proposed to review the medical records of oncology patients included in POWER 1 (as already foreseen in that study), with the aim of performing a 5-year follow-up. To create comparable treatment and control groups, the Propensity Index method will be used. To study each variable, multivariate regression will be used. Kaplan-Meier will be used for survival and the log-rank test for comparisons. Significance will be considered if p <0.05 (two tails).
The GerOnTe TWOBE study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the GerOnTe intervention, consisting of a renewed, patient-centred, care pathway coordinated by an APN and supported by a Health Professional Consortium and IC Technology, compared to the current standard of care in the eight different Belgian and Dutch hospitals.
Short title POWER Audit Methods 60 days national (Spain) audit of postoperative complications following elective gastrointestinal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Research sites Hospitals undertaking elective lower gastrointestinal surgery. Objective To provide detailed data describing post-operative complications and associated mortality; and length of stay. To provide detailed data describing adherence to ERAS protocol and its association to morbidity. Number of patients Not specified. All eligible patients undergoing surgery during the study month. Inclusion Criteria All adult patients (aged ≥18 years) undergoing lower gastrointestinal elective surgery within an ERAS protocol during the 60 day study period. Statistical analysis Univariate analysis will be used to test factors (patient, surgical, and ERAS related) associated with surgical complications, length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital death. Single and multi-level logistic regression models will be constructed to identify factors independently associated with these outcomes and to adjust for differences in confounding factors. A stepwise approach will be used to enter new terms. A single final analysis is planned at the end of the study. Summary statistics with post hoc Bonferroni corrections will be used to assess possible dose-response dependence in percentage of patients with postoperative complications and LOS. Proposed Start Date A 60 day period between 2017 Proposed End Date Data collection will end by September 2017 Study Duration Six months
Our broad, long-term objective is to create a new non-resident (non-teaching) hospital service that uses patient-centered critical pathway care plans for treating patients in St. Marys Hospital. This innovative service, the Hospital Medicine (HOME) Team, will integrate three timely, high-priority concepts in healthcare: patient-centered quality care, evidence-based medicine, and principles that define high reliability organizations. The target populations for the new model of service are patients hospitalized with pre-defined admission diagnoses who are expected to require only a brief, focused hospital stay of four days or less. Specifically, we will 1) Design the prototypical approach to be used for developing all critical pathway care plans by integrating patient-centered quality care, evidence-based medicine, and principles that define high reliability organizations, 2) Systematically design the critical pathway care plans for two pre-defined admission diagnoses (community-acquired pneumonia and non-surgical low-back pain), and 3) Compare outcomes of this new service against respective historical patient cohorts for patients admitted with community-acquired pneumonia and non-surgical low-back pain. We anticipate that the prototypic methodology used to develop this patient-centered service will be replicated for other new hospital-service models. To our knowledge, there are currently no existing hospital services in the U.S. that have intentionally integrated principles of high reliability organizations into evidence-based critical pathways founded on patient-centered principles of uncompromising quality.