View clinical trials related to Critical Illness.
Filter by:Although a life-saving intervention, invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) prone to complications and side effects. Cirrhotic patients with a need of prolonged MV have a poor prognosis in ICU compared to general population of critically ill patients. The optimal time for weaning from MV and extubation is therefore a crucial objective. Extubation failure is defined as the need for reintubation within 48-72 hours (early). This time frame is sometimes extended to 7 days (delayed), especially when noninvasive ventilation is used during extubation (SFAR-SRLF 2018 recommendations). Some studies have investigated the risk factors for extubation failure in general population of critically ill patients, and in some specific subpopulations (COPD, brain injury, elderly). But little is known about extubation failure in cirrhotic patients admitted in ICU. The aim of the present study is to describe the incidence and identify specific risk factors for extubation failure in cirrhotic critically ill patients. Ultrasound and clinical data will be collected and analysed during the ICU stay.
A quasi experimental study that aims to verify whether the incorporation of VExUS in patients with AKI in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) may prompt tailored interventions to increases the number of days free from Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT) during the first 28 days.
The emerging SARS-COV2 virus has shed a new light on the cross-talks between the immune and the hemostatic system. In this study we aim to evaluate the dynamic change in coagulation caused by the modulation of the inflammatory response by interleukin-6 antagonist as assessed by viscoelastic methods in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Furthermore we try to draw attention to possible associations between the endothelial cell injury, inflammation and coagulation.
Multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial providing mobile health supported physical rehabilitation to 120 patients who have been critically ill with COVID-19 and who complete at least one exercise session.
In this prospective, randomised, open-label, parallel group, feasibility trial; the investigators will objectively assess whether it is feasible to apply the Geko device to critically ill adults for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared to usual care with intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPCs).
Following whole blood stimulation with mesenchymal stem cell derived exosomes, immune phenotype, cytokine release and mRNA expression patterns from critically ill patients with COVID-19 will be determined.
The aim is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of an immune modulating enteral nutrition formula versus the regular formula on the outcomes of critically ill septic patients by assessment of clinical outcomes, immune profile, tolerability and enteral nutrition intolerance and laboratory markers
Rationale: Survival rates of patients with critical illness have increased due to improved facilities and treatment methods in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, surviving critical illness does not mean these patients are cured. In general, ICU-admission is associated with decreased physical performance and perceived physical health, impaired mental health and quality of life (QoL), reflecting in an impaired long-term recovery. Long-term health problems can partly be contributed to prolonged muscle weakness and malnutrition. Improving physical performance and perceived physical health may play a key role in boosting recovery after ICU-admission. Mono-interventions focusing on improving physical performance or nutritional intake have limited effect on long term functioning and QoL. A lifestyle intervention encompassing physical therapy and optimisation of caloric and protein intake may improve wellbeing and QoL in these patients. Previous studies found that interventions focused on mobilization and physical rehabilitation are feasible within the ICU and outpatient programs. Additionally, promising results were found in personalized healthcare and lifestyle programs for other patient groups with long-term health problems, such as cancer survivors and patients with diabetes or mental health problems. Based on this, the investigators hypothesized that a lifestyle intervention program may improve wellbeing and quality of life in long-term ICU-survivors. Objective: Evaluation of the effects of a integrative lifestyle intervention program on physical performance and perceived physical health, mental health and health related quality of life after ICU-admission. Study design: Randomised controlled trial Study population: Long-term ICU patients (length of stay ICU ≥48h) Intervention: The intervention group will be part of a 12-week combined lifestyle intervention encompassing group physical therapy twice a week and improvement of dietary caloric and protein intake by means of nutritional advice and, if applicable, caloric and/or protein supplementation. The control group will be subject to follow up meetings with research staff to assess physical and mental health and quality of life. Main study parameters/endpoints: Physical functioning (RAND-36 subscale-score) at the end of the 12 week intervention period. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: All participants have two additional appointments where they participate in an interview and perform physical tests (bioimpedance measurements, ultrasound of the upper thigh muscles, hand grip strength test, Morton mobility index test, and the six-minute walking test with pulse oximetry). At baseline and week 12 of the program, all participants complete a combination of questionnaires on mental health and quality of life. The intervention group will additionally be subject to supervised group training sessions twice a week for the duration of the intervention (12 weeks). Further, two meetings with a professional about their diet will be organised. If a patient has a deficit in caloric and/or protein intake, dietary supplements with daily intake instructions will be provided. The risks and disadvantages of this intervention are minimal. However, this study requires considerable time investment and physical and mental effort. The extent of this study is crucial to clarify the effect of a combined intervention program on recovery after critical illness.
Nearly half of critically ill children are intubated and enterally fed according to recent guidelines. However, no evidence-based recommendation are available regarding fasting times prior to extubation. When an extubation is planned, children do not always present with normal neurological status yet, and are at risk of vomiting and aspiration. Extubation may also fail and require re-intubation with similar risks. Thus, pre-operative fasting guidelines are often transposed to the paediatric critical care setting, aiming for an empty stomach at extubation, with perceived decreased risks of aspiration. However, the gastric and gut motility pathophysiology is significantly different in critically ill children (frequent gastroparesis, liquid continuous feeding, etc.) compared to planned surgery children. The extrapolation of practice validated in the latter population may be inadequate. The stomach may be empty more or less rapidly than expected, leading to unnecessary prolonged fasting times or inappropriately short fasting times respectively. Gastric ultrasounding monitoring may help assessing gastric content prior to extubation. Investigators hypothesise gastric content clearance may be different in critically ill children prior to extubation, compared to pre-operative paediatric guidelines for elective surgery.
This study aims to determine the ways in which clinician implicit racial biases affect clinician communication with family members of patients near the end of life and to test a novel physician training intervention to reduce the effects of implicit racial bias on quality of communication. Phase 1: A sample of 50 physicians who care for seriously ill patients, including oncologists, critical care physicians and hospital-based internists will participated in a simulated clinical encounter with a Black standardized family member (actor) of a hypothetical case patient. Measures of implicit and explicit bias will be correlated with verbal and nonverbal communication behavior. Phase 2: This is a 2-arm randomized feasibility pilot of an intervention to mitigate the effects of clinician implicit bias on communication behavior. Physicians who treat patients with serious illness including oncologists, critical care physicians and hospital-based internists will be recruited to participate in a communication training session to reduce the effects of implicit bias or a control training session focusing only on communication skills. Their communication behavior will be videotaped during a simulated encounter with a Black standardized family member (actor) of a hypothetical patient with serious illness before and after the training sessions. The communication behavior before and after the training session will be compared between physicians that received the communication skills only intervention versus the physicians that received the communication skills and bias mitigation training. The primary hypothesis is that physicians who receive both the communication skills and the bias mitigation training will have greater improvements in communication skills with the Black standardized caregiver (actor) compared with those who receive only the communication skills training.