View clinical trials related to Coxarthrosis.
Filter by:In this study, continuous erector spinae plane block (ESPB) will be compared to continuous epidural analgesia in patients undergoing elective hip replacement surgery. Opioid consumption, pain severity, quadriceps femoris muscle strength, ability to walk, and quality of recovery will be evaluated. Moreover, chronic pain severity in months after the hospital discharge will be assessed.
The study will analyze hip biomechanical parameters using EOS radiographic measurements pre- and post-operatively (3 months) and post-operatively (3 months) CT scans after total hip replacement (THR), neck-preserving THR of the Minihip type or hip resurfacing (HR). Clinical results will be assessed at 3 months and 1 year after surgery. To this end, two types of examination are carried out, both of which are used in current practice: - Pre-operatively: EOS radiography - Post-operatively: EOS radiograph and CT scan Inclusion (m-3; m-1) : - Patient information at pre-operative visit - Non-opposition of patient, family member or legal guardian, if applicable - Questionnaires and clinical examination (standard management) - EOS during anesthetic consultation Follow-up visit (m+3): - Post-operative follow-up consultation EOS and CT scan (1 week prior to visit) + questionnaire and clinical examination Follow-up visit (m+12): - Post-operative check-up, questionnaire and clinical examination
Total hip arthroplasty is a successful surgical procedure performed as a last-line treatment in primary and secondary coxarthrosis. Recently, the direct anterior approach (DAA) has gained popularity by maintaining abduction force and reducing dislocation rates. Soft tissue stability in the anterior is increased by adding capsule repair with the preservation of the posterior structures in the DAA. The degradation of the biological structure of the capsule due to degenerative changes in the end stage coxarthrosis questions the effectiveness of the capsule repair. therefore, the effect of capsule repair on stability is still controversial.
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been successful in relieving pain and restoring function in patients with advanced arthritis of the hip joint. Increased focus on earlier recovery and decreased postoperative pain has improved overall satisfaction. However, there is still a gap between the clinical scores in objective surveys and patient satisfaction. Direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty has a low dislocation rate, abductor strength restoration, acceleration, and cosmetic advantages. In this method, capsulotomy with repair or capsulectomy is applied as the preferences of surgeons. Therefore, this can cause both a decrease in hip flexion strength and a loss in knee extension strength. Our aim in this study is to reveal how much muscle loss was caused by comparing both methods with the intact side.
Abstract Background: The effect of intra-articular treatment of hip osteoarthritis with hyaluronic acid in the hip joint is not based on large randomized controlled trials. Hyaluronic acid is a well established treatment for osteoarthritis of the knee. Methods: Randomized controlled trial with three-armed parallel-group design. The patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomized into one of the following groups: infiltration of the hip joint with hyaluronic acid, with corticosteroids or with bupivacaine 0,125%. Pain VAS, Harris Hip Score and HOOS were scored during follow-up. The patients will be asked to determine their situation as worse, stabile or better then at the time of enrollment. There will be asked if they use painkillers and if they have complications/adverse events. These outcome measure instruments will be used at the time of enrollment in the study prior to any injection, and then again at six weeks, 3 and 6 months after the initial injection. The six-month follow-up period begins for all patients on the date the first injection will be administered.