There are about 6461 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Russian Federation. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab compared to certolizumab pegol in the treatment of subjects with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
The purpose of this study is to compare LY900014 to insulin lispro, both in combination with insulin glargine or insulin degludec, in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the study drug LY900014 compared to insulin lispro, both in combination with insulin glargine or insulin degludec, in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D).
This is a single-dose, randomized, two-period cross-over study with 72 healthy male and female volunteers. The investigational products will be given (after fasting overnight) at separate visits separated by 7 ± 3 days. Blood for pharmacokinetic analyses will be drawn pre-dose and at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 60, 75, 90, 105 minutes, as well as 2, 2.25, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 12 hours after drug administration. Subjects will also be monitored to capture any adverse events that may occur. Bioequivalence will be assessed based on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of paracetamol, guaifenesin and phenylephrine, respectively
A study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glecaprevir(GLE)/pibrentasvir(PIB) in treatment-naïve participants with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes 1-6 infection and with an aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) of less than or equal to 1.
Primary Objective: To demonstrate non-inferiority of SAR341402 versus NovoLog/NovoRapid in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) change from baseline to Week 26 in participants with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM or T2DM) also using Lantus®. Secondary Objectives: - To assess the immunogenicity of SAR341402 and NovoLog/NovoRapid in terms of positive/negative status and anti-insulin antibody (AIA) titers during the course of the study. - To assess the relationship of AIAs with efficacy and safety. - To assess the efficacy of SAR341402 and NovoLog/NovoRapid in terms of proportion of participants reaching HbA1c lesser than (<) 7.0% and change in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) profiles from baseline to Week 26 and Week 52 (only Week 52 for HbA1c). - To assess safety of SAR341402 and NovoLog/NovoRapid.
The primary objective of the trial is to assess the PK similarity between patients receiving Humira® continuously vs those who alternate between BI 695501 and Humira®, in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. The secondary objectives of this trial are to descriptively compare the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy profiles between patients receiving Humira® continuously vs those who alternate between BI 695501 and Humira®.
This is a multi-centre observational, ambispective study, which will retrospectively and prospectively collect clinical variables and socio-demographic data from medical records of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) initiated with dapagliflozin by general practitioners (GPs) and endocrinologists in real-life setting. It is anticipated that patient recruitment will last 8 months (from Q3 2017 to Q1 2018) and each patient will be followed during the second visit 6±3 months later after the first visit. There are 2 time points: - Baseline data: baseline data are defined as data available within 3 months prior to the first dose of dapagliflozin. In case of presence of multiple data values within baseline period the most recent pre-dose value will be selected - Follow-up data: any post-baseline data will be considered as follow-up but the primary analysis will be focused on data available at 6±3 months after the first visit. In case of discontinuation dapagliflozin, data will be collected at routine visit within 3-month time frame after the last dose
This study is a national, multicenter, interventional, non-randomized, non-controlled, open-label study to assess the effectiveness of pirfenidone in participants with IPF in Russian clinical practice.
Background: until now, there is no agreement about the safest and feasible method for liver parenchyma transection during laparoscopic liver resection. Study design: prospective, randomized, single-center The purpose of the study: comparison of short-term results of two methods of parenchyma liver transection during laparoscopic liver resection