There are about 9702 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Poland. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of seltorexant compared with quetiapine extended-release (XR) as adjunctive therapy to an antidepressant drug in treatment response in participants with major depressive disorder with insomnia symptoms (MDDIS) who have had an inadequate response to current antidepressant therapy with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI).
Ultrasound can reliably detect morphologic changes associated with pneumonia. Additionally, protocols were elaborated which unify the investigation procedure and improve the intra- and interrater reliability. Moreover, ultrasound is a time and cost-effective and widely available method. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the ultrasound of the lungs in predicting the length of hospitalization, of intensive care and of mechanical ventilation in Covid-19 pneumonia. Further aims are the evaluation of the efficacy of the ultrasound of the lungs in predicting the risk of death and of long-term pulmonary complications as consequences of Covid-19 pneumonia.
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of MSB11456 and EU approved RoActemra® in participants with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis. Participants will be randomized at the beginning of the Core Treatment Period (Baseline to Week 24) to receive either MSB11456 or EU approved RoActemra® once a week (QW). At the beginning of the Extended Treatment Period (Week 24 to Week 52), participants who received RoActemra® will be re-randomized to either continue receiving RoActemra® QW or switch to receive MSB11456 QW.
The aim of the study is to assess the usefulness of the indirect bronchial hyperresponsiveness test (with hypertonic NaCl) in determining the optimal dose of inhaled steroids to maintain asthma control. The study was designed as a prospective, real-life, randomized, interventional study. This single-site study is performed at the Allergology Clinic in Lesko. The study included participants aged 7-15 years who met the eligibility criteria. Eligible participants were selected from a pool of 231 patients with mild asthma, under the care of the Allergology Clinic of the Regional Public Hospital in Lesko (Poland). All participants were diagnosed with chronic mild asthma for at least two years. Subjects initially enrolled in the study had good asthma control maintained for at least 3 months on low / medium-dose ICS monotherapy, with no exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids in the previous 3 months, no respiratory tract infection in last month, and an FEV1 above 80% expected. Finally, 108 children were enrolled in the study. They were aged 7-15 years, with active mild asthma, confirmed by the presence of bronchial hyperreactivity and symptoms of asthma, emerging after discontinuation of anti-inflammatory treatment. Participation in the study lasted one year. The study includes: 4-week run-in period (withdrawal phase) after discontinuation of anti-inflammatory treatment (ICS) with clinical symptoms and medication use recording, completed by the patient and parents. At the end of this period, spirometry was performed, bronchial hyperreactivity was assessed with the hyperosmolar salt provocation, and the parameters of inflammation were measured: orally exhaled nitric oxide concentration (NO) and peripheral blood eosinophilia. The anti-inflammatory treatment was then resumed (with ICS in the previous doses). Only patients with active asthma and increased bronchial responsiveness (DRS>0.55) were qualified for the main study. Stratified randomization was performed for age, clinical symptoms, and the degree of bronchial hyperresponsiveness. On this basis, the division into 2 research groups was made: - a symptom-only monitored treatment group - a group in which therapy changes were based on the symptoms and degree of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR group). Patients/parents were provided by an established algorithm for managing asthma symptoms/exacerbations. In the case of loss of asthma control, a beta-agonist was administered (temporarily) and the dose of ICS quadrupled. Patients had the possibility of additional visits - if necessary. Especially, severe exacerbations were verified by the attending physician, and on this basis, oral steroids would be considered. Throughout the study, the participants kept daily observation charts (clinical symptoms and drug use) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) measurements. The telephone report was made monthly with the number of days with asthma symptoms and medications used, and this was recorded in the documentation of the study. The clinical evaluation was performed every 3 months with symptom evaluation, spirometry, exhaled NO, peripheral blood eosinophilia, and BHR measurements (half of the patients). The treatment adjustments were guided by the patient's and parent's reporting of symptoms, and additionally by the results of periodic clinical assessment (including the assessment of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in the BHR group). This means that the level of treatment intensity (ICS dose) was based on symptom monitoring only in the observation group, and additionally took into account the level of bronchial responsiveness in the BHR monitoring group. The study was completed after one year of follow-up (4 visits every 3 months). The primary endpoint of the study: the number of asthma exacerbations in both study arms. Secondary endpoints: - days with symptoms - asthma medication days - final dose of ICS - spirometry (FEV1, MMEF) - bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR group only) - nitric oxide in the exhaled air - peripheral blood eosinophilia.
This is a study in adults who had a heart attack (myocardial infarction). The purpose of this study is to find out whether a medicine called empagliflozin helps to lower the chances of having to go to the hospital for heart failure and whether it lowers the chances of dying from cardiovascular disease. People who are in hospital may join the study soon after being treated for their heart attack. Participants are put into 2 groups by chance. One group takes 1 empagliflozin tablet a day. The other group takes 1 placebo tablet a day. Placebo tablets look like empagliflozin tablets but do not contain any medicine. All participants continue their standard treatment. Empagliflozin belongs to a class of medicines known as SGLT-2 inhibitors. Empagliflozin is a medicine that helps people with type 2 diabetes to lower their blood sugar. Researchers think that empagliflozin might also help people after heart attack who are at risk for heart failure, whether or not they have diabetes. Participants are in the study for about 1 to 2 years. During this time, there are about 4 visits inperson, 2 visits are done either by phone or by use of an mobile application. Results between the empagliflozin and placebo groups are compared. The doctors also regularly check the general health of the participants.
The purpose of the investigation is to study if the use of Fluobeam®-LX to identify parathyroid glands through autofluorescence during thyroid surgery, may reduce the risk of postoperative hypoparathyroidism, defined as low PTH in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy
Researchers in this study want to learn more about the safety of the drug runcaciguat and how well it works when given at the highest dose as tolerated by the individual patient whose kidneys are not working properly and suffering at the same time from high blood sugar and/or high blood pressure and a disease of the heart and the blood vessels. Runcaciguat is a new drug under development for the improvement of kidney function. It works by activating proteins that helps to dilate blood vessels, including vessels in the kidneys. This can improve blood flow in kidney and may slow down the progression of kidney disease. This dilative effect can also influence the heart rate and blood pressure. Researchers also wants to find the best dose of the drug during the study. Participants in this study will receive either runcaciguat or placebo tablets every morning for 8 weeks. A placebo looks like the study drug but does not have any active medicine in it. On a weekly basis, the dose of the runcaciguat will be increased step by step. In total, participants will visit the doctors about 10 times, and the observation will last for about 16 weeks. Blood and urine samples will collected from the participants.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and clinical efficacy of PN-943 450 mg twice daily [BID] and PN-943 150 mg BID, compared with placebo BID, in subjects with moderate to severe active Ulcerative Colitis (UC).
This study looks at the safety and effectiveness of different drugs in treating COVID-19 in people who have been hospitalized with the infection. Participants in the study will be treated with either a study drug plus current standard of care (SOC), or with placebo plus current SOC.
The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of nemolizumab (CD14152) compared to placebo in participants greater than or equal to (>=) 18 years of age with prurigo nodularis (PN) after a 16-week treatment period.