There are about 1254 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Peru. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This is a Phase III, international, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, double-dummy, active-controlled, event-driven study in patients with chronic HF and impaired kidney function who had a recent HF event. The aim is to evaluate the effect of balcinrenone/dapagliflozin vs dapagliflozin, given once daily on top of other classes of SoC, on CV death and HF events.
This study will evaluate the effect of triple ICS/LAMA/LABA therapy with BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg on cardiopulmonary outcomes relative to LAMA/LABA therapy with GFF MDI 14.4/9.6 μg in a population with COPD and elevated cardiopulmonary risk.
The purpose of this study is to measure the efficacy and safety of baxdrostat/dapagliflozin in participants ≥ 18 years of age with CKD and HTN. This study consists of a screening, a 4-week dapagliflozin run-in period for participants naïve to SGLT2i at baseline; a 24-month double-blind period in which participants will receive either baxdrostat/dapagliflozin or dapagliflozin; and a 6-week open-label period in which all participants will discontinue baxdrostat/placebo and receive dapagliflozin alone. Site visits will take place at 2-, 4-, 8-, and 16- weeks following randomisation. Thereafter visits will occur approximately every 4 months, until the 24-month visit at which time baxdrostat/placebo will be discontinued. Participants will continue open-label dapagliflozin for another 6-weeks (approximately), where reassessment of GFR will occur for the primary efficacy endpoint. In the event of premature discontinuation of blinded study intervention, participants will continue in the study and receive open-label dapagliflozin monotherapy, unless the participant meets dapagliflozin specific discontinuation criteria, in which case all study interventions will be discontinued.
Gallstones are relatively frequent in women and constitute one of the main risk factors for gallbladder cancer (GBC). Currently, GBC diagnosis is mainly based on imaging (ultrasound or abdominal CT) associated with invasive examinations (biopsy and surgery), with no marker available to date to accurately predict risk and diagnose the disease early. The only curative treatment for GBC remains surgery with complete resection of tumors in early stages. Given the aggressiveness of GBC and the very limited therapeutic options, as well as the possibility of preventing GBC by cholecystectomy during the 10 to 20 years required for the development of gallbladder tumors, it is imperative to develop effective and efficient prevention strategies based on a prioritization of interventions according to environmental and genetic-molecular risk factors. The investigators aim to identify epidemiological factors linked to the development of GBC, and to identify, validate and functionally characterize genetic-molecular markers in blood, saliva, urine, bile and stool that allow risk prediction, early diagnosis and precision treatment of incidental tumors.
It has been reported that the potential of In Vitro matured oocytes might be affected by the vitrification process. In fact, the freezing and thawing procedures routinely used in IVF laboratories, have not yet been adapted to oocytes coming from early antral follicles (normally used for In Vitro Maturation). This study aims to compare 2 existing protocols for the Vitrification of In Vitro matured oocytes.
This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of KarXT in male and female subjects who are aged 55 to 90 years and have mild to severe Alzheimer's Disease (AD) with moderate to severe psychosis related to AD. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of KarXT compared with placebo in the treatment of subjects with psychosis associated with AD as measured by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Clinician (NPI-C): Hallucinations and Delusions (H+D) score.
The intention of the study is to demonstrate superiority of Saruparib (AZD5305) + physician's choice NHA relative to placebo + physician's choice NHA by assessment of radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in participants with mCSPC.
Women´s period comprises different hormonal stages, being one of them the stage for maximum receptivity and proper embryo implantation. This stage is named window of implantation (WOI), and is characterized by a specific molecular pattern than can be assessed by the Endometrial Receptivity Analysis (ERA® test), developed by Igenomix. Determining the WOI allows to schedule a personalized embryo transfer (pET) when the endometrium is most receptive for the implantation. The main objective of the present study is to improve our knowledge on the endometrial factor in an infertile population with previous implantation failures. To do so, a diagnosis of the endometrial receptivity to determine the WOI (ERA®) and the microbiome (EMMA®) of each participant will be performed, assessing its impact on deferred embryo transfers in terms of reproductive outcomes. Participants will follow their previously programmed IVF/ICSI treatment and, only when one embryo with no major anomalies is reported by PGT-A (Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies), they will be asked to attend to the specific study visit for endometrial fluid and biopsy samples collection. These samples will be used to determine the patient's WOI (ERA®) and endometrial microbiome (EMMA®). The results of neither of the tests will be disclosed to the patient or the doctor, being only used for the study purpose. After this visit, the patient will follow the pre-established schedule for an embryo transfer and pregnancy assessment.
This is a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, global study to explore the efficacy and safety of volrustomig in women with high-risk LACC (FIGO 2018 stage IIIC to IVA cervical cancer with lymph node involvement) who have not progressed following platinum-based CCRT.
The goal of this pilot trial is to test how feasible is to conduct a large clinical trial that evaluate both implementation and effectiveness outcomes of a community-based interventions for older adults with depression in low-resource urban settings from Lima, Peru. The main questions: Is the way we are planning the study, including those who are taking part and what they will do, good for a large study? Is the interventional package we are developing good the way it is, and can it be done the way we planned it?