There are about 13332 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Netherlands. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Rationale: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the standard therapy for elderly patients with high surgical risks. Paravalvular leakage after TAVI is relatively common and there is conflicting evidence regarding the clinical impact of mild paravalvular leakage in self-expanding devices. Prospective data for self-expanding devices are required to compare the extent of paravalvular leakage as a result of device design. Grading paravalvular leakage after TAVI is difficult. Echocardiography and angiography systematically underestimate paravalvular leakage (PVL) as compared to cardiac MRI. Hemodynamic measurements are used to aid decision making directly after TAVI implantation. Prospective data comparing hemodynamic measurements with cardiac MRI are needed to design an optimal strategy to grade paravalvular leakage peri-operatively in order to optimize TAVI outcomes. The combination of aortic valve stenosis, angiodysplasia and von Willebrand Disease type 2A (vWD-2A) is known as Heyde syndrome. Previous studies have shown a decrease in angiodysplastic lesions after TAVI. However, since PVL after TAVI is relatively common, angiodysplastic lesions tend to reoccur. Prospective data comparing the severity of PVL to the severity of both vWD-2A and angiodysplasia are lacking. Objective: To assess procedural hemodynamic measurements in patients with paravalvular regurgitation quantified by means of cardiac MRI (CMR) and to analyse its association with impaired clinical outcome during 5-year follow-up. Secondary objectives are to assess whether the severity of vWD-2A correlates with the severity of PVL measured by cardiac MRI, and to prospectively assess the success percentage of TAVI in the treatment of angiodysplasia. Study design: This is a prospective, single-center clinical trial. Patients will receive a TAVI. After implantation different hemodynamic indices of PVL will be assessed. Within 4-8 weeks after TAVI a cardiac MRI will be performed to quantify the amount of PVL. Standardized clinical follow-up will take place at discharge, 30 days, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year. Telephone follow-up will take place at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after TAVI. In patients with known angiodysplasia or iron deficiency anemia e.c.i., a videocapsule endoscopy (VCE) will take place before TAVI and 6 months after TAVI. Of note, for the substudy on Heyde syndrome, patients with a different type of TAVI valve (i.e. no Abbott Portico valve) are also allowed to participate. Study population: Approximately 80 patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis with an indication for TAVI will be included. At least 76 patients with a cardiac MRI that is of sufficient quality to quantify the amount of PVL will be included. Intervention: Patients will undergo cardiac MRI on top of standard clinical care within 4-8 weeks after TAVI. A subgroup of patients will also undergo a VCE. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is defined as PVL regurgitation fraction as measured by cardiac MRI. One secondary endpoint will comprise a composite of device success, early safety and clinical efficacy as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (1) and will comprise death, vascular complications, stroke/TIA, life-threatening bleeding requiring transfusion, and acute kidney injury requiring dialysis. Another secondary endpoint will be the reduction of angiodysplastic lesions after TAVI as determined by VCE. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The hemodynamic indices can be assessed in a standard fashion using a fluid filled pigtail catheter that is placed in the left ventricle as part of the routine protocol. Following TAVI, enrolled patients will undergo cardiac MRI to assess PVL. The risk of cardiac MRI after TAVI implantation is negligible. Extra blood samples will be taken. After one year, patients will be followed by telephonic follow-up. Risk/benefit: the expected benefit is a structured clinical follow-up at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years, at the cost of an extra visit to undergo cardiac MRI.
This is the open-label extension study of phase II ARGX-113-1802 to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the subcutaneous formulation of efgartigimod in adults with CIDP. Patients already stabilized on efgartigimod PH20 SC will also have the opportunity to participate in a sub study to explore less frequent dosing of efgartigimod PH20 SC.
Brief Summary: Some colorectal liver metastases can only be resected after inducing liver regeneration by portal vein embolization (PVE) to increase size function of the future liver remnant (FLR). While PVE is standard, embolization of portal vein and hepatic veins (PVE/HVE) on one side of the liver may faster and more extensive liver size and function growth. PVE/HVE is a novel procedure and requires a safety and feasibility evaluation in a pretrial (DRAGON1) to then be compared in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to PVE (DRAGON 2).
DISSECT-N is a post-market registry designed to assess real-world safety and effectiveness of Valiant Navion Thoracic Stent Graft System in the treatment of thoracic aortic dissections in real world practice.
This is a Phase III multi-center, randomized, two-arm parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of MBG453 or placebo added to azacitidine in adult subjects with intermediate, high or very high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) as per IPSS-R, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia-2 (CMML-2) who are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) according to medical judgment by the investigator. The purpose of the current study is to assess clinical effects of MBG453 in combination with azacitidine in adult subjects with IPSS-R intermediate, high, very high risk MDS and CMML-2.
This Phase I/IIa trial is designed to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of CyPep-1 when administered directly into malignant tumors in monotherapy and in combination with anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab. Additionally, the trial will monitor anti-tumor effects on both injected lesions and distant non-injected deposits.
Disease activity and response to therapy in ulcerative colitis (UC) can be assessed by a range of endpoints including symptoms, endoscopic mucosal activity, histological disease activity, and biomarkers. This study aims to determine the optimal treatment target, which is a research priority for the management of UC both to inform clinical practice and to help inform regulatory endpoints and targets for drug development. Participants with active UC will be randomized in a 5:4:1 (initially 2:3:5) ratio to 1 of 3 groups, each with a different treatment target. Treatment targets will be defined as: - Group 1: corticosteroid-free symptomatic remission - Group 2: corticosteroid-free endoscopic + symptomatic remission - Group 3: corticosteroid-free histological + endoscopic + symptomatic remission An interim analysis was performed to assess the proportion of subjects that reached their assigned treatment target after 50 subjects in each group had reached the first 32-week assessment. The interim analysis and projections made based on target achievement rates for all subjects included in the interim analysis resulted in a recommendation to adjust the randomization ratio from 2:3:5 to 5:4:1 for Groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively as of May 5th, 2023. This change was necessary in order to complete the study with approximately 100 subjects achieving treatment target within each group.
This study will evaluate the efficacy of tiragolumab plus atezolizumab and carboplatin and etoposide (CE) compared with placebo plus atezolizumab and CE in participants with chemotherapy-naive extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Eligible participants will be stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (0 vs. 1), LDH (</= upper limit of normal [ULN] vs. > ULN), and presence or history of brain metastasis (yes vs. no) and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive one of the following treatment regimens during induction phase: - Arm A: Tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus CE - Arm B: Placebo plus atezolizumab plus CE Following the induction phase, participants will continue maintenance therapy with either atezolizumab plus tiragolumab (Arm A) or atezolizumab plus placebo (Arm B).
Rationale: A big step forward and great opportunity to improve overall efficacy of bronchoscopic lung volume reductioen is to combine treatment modalities aiming to close the dependent collateral channels and then proceed with EBV therapy to induce lobar collapse, and thus maximal treatment effect. Objective: Primary objective: 1. To investigate the feasibility of injecting AeriSeal into the interlobar collateral ventilation channels region to make the target lobe suitable for endobronchial valve treatment. Secondary objectives: 2. To investigate the safety of injecting AeriSeal into the interlobar collateral ventilation channels region to make the target lobe suitable for endobronchial valve treatment. 3. To investigate the effectiveness of injecting AeriSeal into the interlobar collateral ventilation channels region to make the target lobe suitable for endobronchial valve treatment.
The purpose of the trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide to dulaglutide in participants with type 2 diabetes and increased cardiovascular risk.