There are about 11304 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Denmark. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Open label clinical randomized trial comparing three strategies for managing acute intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism
The trial is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose escalation trial of weekly TransCon CNP administered subcutaneously in prepubertal children 2 to 10 years old, inclusive, with Achondroplasia.
This study will test how well a new medicine called concizumab works in the body of people with haemophilia A or B with inhibitors. The purpose is to show that concizumab can prevent bleeds in the body and is safe to use. Participants who usually only take medicine to treat bleeds (on-demand) will be placed in one of two groups. In one group, participants will get study medicine from the start of the study. In the other group, participants will continue with their normal medicine and get study medicine after 6 months. Which treatment the participant gets is decided by chance. Participants who usually take medicine to prevent bleeds (prophylaxis treatment) or who are already being treated with concizumab (study medicine) will receive the study medicine from the start of the study. Participants will get 1 injection with the study medicine every day under the skin. This participants will have to do themselves and can be done at home. The study doctor will hand out the medicine in the form of a pen-injector. The pen-injector will contain the study medicine. The study will last for about six years. The length of time the participants will be in the study depends on when they agreed to take part or when the medicine is available for purchase in their country (12 November 2025 at the latest). Participants will have to come to the clinic for up to 41 times. The time between visits will be approximately 4 weeks for the first 6 to 12 months, depending on the group participants are in and approximately 8 weeks for the rest of the study. Participants will be asked to record information into an electronic diary during the study and may also be asked to wear an activity tracker.
This study will test how well a new medicine called concizumab works in the body of people with haemophilia A or B without inhibitors. The purpose is to show that concizumab can prevent bleeds in the body and is safe to use. Participants who usually only take medicine to treat bleeds (on-demand) will be placed in one of two groups. In one group participants will get study medicine from the start of the study. In the other group participants will continue with their normal medicine and get study medicine after 6 months. Which treatment the participant gets is decided by chance. Participants who usually take medicine to prevent bleeds (prophylaxis treatment) or who are already being treated with concizumab (study medicine) will receive the study medicine from the start of the study. Participants will have to inject themselves with the study medicine 1 time every day under the skin. This can be done at home. The study doctor will hand out the medicine in the form of a pen-injector. The pen-injector will contain the study medicine. The study will last for up to 6.5 years. The length of time the participant will be in the study depends on when they agreed to take part or when the medicine is available for purchase in their country (21 April 2026 at the latest). Participants will have to come to the clinic for up to 40 times. The time between visits will be approximately 4 weeks for the first 6 to 12 months depending on the group participants are in, and approximately 8 weeks for the rest of the study. If the participant attends extra visits due to the prescription medicine not being available for purchase in their country, these will be 14 weeks apart. Participants will be asked to record information in an electronic diary during the study and may also be asked to wear an activity tracker.
This is the world's first national orthopedic randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 19 out of 21 departments in Denmark. Each year, 7,000 patients suffer a hip fracture. This is a severe condition leading to 25% mortality after 1 year and 40% do not recover to the same functional level. The aim is to compare two surgical treatment methods (metal fixation versus artificial hip) in patients above 65 years with an undisplaced femoral neck fracture. The hypothesis is that even though an artificial hip is a larger surgical procedure than metal fixation of the broken bone, the artificial hip is more stable with less pain due the lack of a healing broken bone and therefore leads to a better and quicker mobilization after surgery. Better mobilization is one of the most important factors for decreasing mortality. We have chosen a pragmatic RCT design by using the local departmental implants. We hope that the knowledge from this study will therefore easily be implemented afterwards.
Hip osteoarthritis is associated with joint pain, physical disability, decreased muscle strength and poor health status, and the most common cause for total hip arthroplasty. No studies have investigated the effect of total hip arthroplasty compared to non-surgical treatment in patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis. This comparison is of upmost importance as it is unknown whether non-surgical treatment may be used as an alternate to surgery. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether total hip arthroplasty followed by standard care is superior to progressive resistance training for improving hip function and pain in patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis. The hypothesis is that patients treated with total hip arthroplasty will improve more than patients treated with progressive resistance training.
Under 50% of patients diagnosed with hypertension and treated in general practice, have reached a blood pressure within the recommended levels of the national guideline. Compliance is the main problem for these patients, but effective tools for increasing patient compliance are missing. The objective is to evaluate the risk-assessment and risk-communication tool: "Your Heart Forecast", to see if it can improve patient compliance, health literacy and empowerment. Patients will be followed in a cluster-randomised controlled trial in the setting of general practice, using surveys at inclusion and after 6 and 12 months. Besides surveys, the participants' blood pressure will be measured as a hard outcome and data will be drawn from various patient databases. After 6 months, qualitative interviews will be conducted, with a subgroup of patients from the intervention group. It is expected to find whether the use of Your Heart Forecast can lower patients' blood pressure and/or increase their compliance, health literacy and empowerment. The aim is to show if an increase in general health literacy and patient empowerment, as measured by Patient Activation Measure(PAM13) can be seen. The investigators hope to reveal whether this software can improve patient compliance and thereby be a reasonable tool to implement in the national blood pressure control program. In further studies, it should be shown if the cost of using this program is far less than expenses for hospitalisation due to complications and comorbidity to hypertension.
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-selection study in which two doses of nangibotide are tested versus placebo.
PURPOSE: Glaucoma is the leading cause of non-curable blindness globally. Patients with glaucoma will get a gradual narrowing of the visual fields caused by compression at the optic nerve head due to increased intraocular pressure. Thus the main preventive strategy is to reduce intraocular pressure, initially by eye drops and/or laser treatment but in some patients surgery is warranted. The surgical procedure (trabeculectomy) most widely performed worldwide creates a path from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival space and thereby lowers the IOP by producing a more efficient drainage of the aqueous humour. Surgical success depends upon controlling post-operative inflammation to ensure a functional drainage. The purpose of this blinded, randomized study is to investigate which anti-inflammatory treatment provides better long-term control of intra-ocular pressure (IOP) following glaucoma surgery (trabeculectomy) by comparing topical NSAIDs to topical steroids. Additionally, we want to explore the mechanisms behind the pathophysiology of glaucoma by evaluating retinal and optic nerve head perfusion before and after IOP lowering surgery. The primary outcome is the intraocular pressure 12 months after surgery measured by applanation tonometry. MAIN HYPOTHESIS: - NSAIDs and steroids are equally effective in assuring long-term filtering function and controlling IOP after trabeculectomy but may be associated with different risk profiles and bleb morphology - Patients with lower post-operative IOP demonstrate less progression of visual field loss - Trabeculectomy lowers IOP and provides better microcirculation in and oxygenation of inner retinal layers (i.e. ganglion cell layer) and the optic nerve head
Phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a benralizumab in patients with moderate to very severe COPD with a history of frequent COPD exacerbations and elevated peripheral blood eosinophils (≥300/μL). Eligible patients must have a history of ≥2 moderate and/or severe COPD exacerbations in the previous year despite receiving triple (ICS/LABA/LAMA) background therapy for at least 3 months and ICS-based dual inhaled treatment for the remainder of the year. Eligible patients must also have an elevated blood eosinophil count. The treatment period will be of variable duration and will continue until the last patient has the opportunity to complete a minimum of 56 weeks, at which point all patients will complete the study. The primary endpoint will be analyzed at Week 56.