Clinical Trials Logo

Cost Effectiveness clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Cost Effectiveness.

Filter by:
  • Active, not recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT04810650 Active, not recruiting - Hypertension Clinical Trials

A Multisectoral Strategy to Address Persistent Drivers of the HIV Epidemic in East Africa

SAPPHIRE
Start date: April 15, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The randomized trials in this record will assess effectiveness, fidelity and cost of prevention and treatment interventions for HIV and hypertension with the objective of informing a population-based study of multi-sectored, multi-disease interventions for HIV.

NCT ID: NCT03977181 Active, not recruiting - HIV Prevention Clinical Trials

The Community PrEP Study to Assess the Acceptance of PrEP Delivered Through CBCT Platforms

Start date: October 26, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The investigators aim to 1) speed up access to and delivery of PrEP to young women, and 2) compare interventions to support and maximize the prevention-effective use of PrEP. Specifically, the investigators aim to answer the following two questions: 1) how can the study use existing community-based platforms to identify and deliver PrEP to those in need? and 2) which adherence support interventions are most likely to engender effective use of PrEP? The investigators propose to answer these questions by leveraging existing community-based HIV testing platforms in South Africa and use a mixed methods approach to optimize the PrEP cascade and evaluate a community-based PrEP adherence program for young women.

NCT ID: NCT03906747 Active, not recruiting - Palliative Care Clinical Trials

End-of-Life Management Protocol Offered Within Emergency Room: a Multicentre Study (EMPOWER)

EMPOWER
Start date: January 18, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

End-of-life (EOL) care has garnered increasing recognition and acceptance in the field of emergency medicine. Some emergency departments (EDs) in Singapore have instituted or plan to institute EOL care as part of the workflow. However, the EOL protocols are not standardised across all these EDs. The adherence to and quality of EOL care have not been formally measured in all institutions. Hence, gaps to improve the quality of care have yet to be determined. The aims are to systematically measure the current quality of EOL care in three Singapore hospital EDs and identify the quality gaps; formulate interventions to address these gaps and implement the improved EOL care; and measure the improvement post-implementation. The investigators hypothesise that the current quality of EOL care in three EDs is suboptimal and the interventions planned will improve the quality of care provided. The study team plans to conduct an interrupted time series study to detect whether the interventions have an effect significantly greater than any underlying trend over time. The quality of care indicators to be measured are timely identification of patients who require EOL care, adequacy of symptom control based on compliance to prescriptions, opportunities to discuss and develop an individualised care plan, perceived quality of care by healthcare providers and next-of-kin, and cost effectiveness. Planned interventions include refining the protocol with collaboration of content experts in palliative care, education and training of healthcare providers, and addressing specific gaps identified to improve cost effectiveness. The results of this study will form the standardisation and foundation for establishing the national benchmark for quality of EOL care in Singapore EDs.