View clinical trials related to Coronavirus Disease.
Filter by:The coronavirus (COVID -19) has rapidly turned into a global pandemic. For patients diagnosed with COVID-19, it caused severe damage in the upper respiratory system and systemic complications, including the cardiovascular, mental, nervous, and musculoskeletal system. Previous research has indicated that these subsequent sequelae can reduce quality of life. (A. W. Wong et al., 2020) Studies have indicated that exercise training is beneficial to improve blood pressure, reduce cardiovascular factors, reduce complications, and relieve depression (J. Galloza et al., 2017) However, the current international research on the benefits of exercise rehabilitation and the improvement of quality of life in patients who have been infected with COVID-19 is still lacking. Under the international epidemic, it is pointed out that the importance of telerehabilitation has also been advocated worldwide. Previous systematic review indicated that no matter it is nervous, muscular or cardiac system disease, the efficacy of telerehabilitation is superior to face-to-face rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is to compare the effect between the intervention of KNEESUP smart knee assistive device, the use of the APP, and the health education in routine outpatient after diagnosis of Long Covid-19.
The Covixyl-V LAEH Nasal Spray's safety and efficay is clinically tested for use in subjects with COVID-19 infection. A randomized, double-blind, multi-center study is conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ethyl lauroyl arginate hydrochloride (LAEH) formulation versus a matching placebo formulation administered as a nasal spray to reduce viral load from nasal area of subjects with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Adaptive Biotechnologies has developed a clinical test called T-Detect COVID Test that can identify a T-cell response to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, indicating recent or prior infection This study aims to evaluate the potential cross-reactivity of the T-Detect COVID test in participants presenting with viral upper respiratory tract infections within the assay's intended use population and testing positive for seasonal coronavirus.
The purposes of this study are to demonstrate the non-inferiority (NI) of the neutralizing antibody response to the original strain 14 days after booster vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S at the different dose levels, administered greater than or equal to (>=) 6 months after single-dose primary vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S, compared to the neutralizing antibody response to the original strain induced by single-dose primary vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S; To demonstrate the NI of the neutralizing antibody response to the leading variant of high consequence or concern 14 days after booster vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S at the 5*10^10 virus particle (vp) dose level, administered >= 6 months after single-dose primary vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S (5*10^10 vp dose level), compared to the neutralizing antibody response to the leading variant of high consequence or concern induced by single-dose primary vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S at the 5*10^10 vp dose level, if feasible; To demonstrate the NI of the neutralizing antibody response to the original strain 14 days after booster vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S at the different dose levels administered >=6 months after completing a 2-dose primary vaccination with Pfizer BNT162b2, compared to the neutralizing antibody response to the original strain induced by 2-dose primary vaccination with Pfizer BNT162b2; To demonstrate the NI of neutralizing antibody response to the leading variant of high consequence or concern 14 days after booster vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S at the 5*10^10 vp dose level, administered >= 6 months after completing a 2-dose primary vaccination with Pfizer BNT162b2, compared to the neutralizing antibody response to the leading variant of high consequence or concern induced by 2-dose primary vaccination with Pfizer BNT162b2, if feasible.
Through history, there have been plenty of pandemics however; the social response to corona virus disease (COVID-19) is unparalleled. It is assessed that almost four billion individuals are living in social segregation during this mother of all pandemics. Initially described in China in December 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread all over the world and by 18th July 2020- there was an emergent figure of 13,824,739 confirmed cases and 591.666 losses reported to the WHO. To date, Egypt reported slightly over 82,000 confirmed COVID-19 cases with 3858 deaths. The new pandemic is injuring not only health organizations of several countries but also the financial prudence universal. Defining the clinical features and associated outcomes of patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is fundamental to improving our understanding and adequate management of this illness. Several articles have recently been published, describing the clinical features and outcomes of retrospective individuals with COVID-19
Since the outbreak of coronavirus disease - COVID-19 pandemic, most attention has focused on mode of transmission, clinical picture of the disease, treatment and prevention. In the coming weeks and months emphasis will gradually involve the post- acute care of COVID-19 survivors. It is anticipated that COVID-19 may have major impact on physical, cognitive, mental, social health status even in patients with mild disease. Moreover, pulmonary, radiologic, laboratory, sleep issues remain to be addressed
The purpose of this study is to assess safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy, and PK of TAK-671 in participants with COVID-19.
To compare various treatments provided to positive COVID-19 patients at locations across the OSF Ministry. Provide the opportunity to compare the effectiveness of various treatments and treatment timelines provided to specific cohorts of patients that have the potential to impact future treatment plans for COVID-19 patients and/or future research hypotheses.