Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04284345
Other study ID # 2019-00910
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 31, 2020
Est. completion date January 1, 2024

Study information

Verified date May 2024
Source University Hospital, Geneva
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The presence of inducible myocardial ischemia is considered as the prerequisite for the clinical benefit of coronary revascularization. In this regard, the introduction of invasive pressure-derived physiological indices to guide myocardial revascularization represented a major breakthrough for the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), by moving the focus of coronary revascularization from anatomy to physiology . The main premise of coronary physiology is to permit determination of the functional significance of individual stenoses on a per-vessel basis, measurable at the time of clinical decision-making process, thus providing an objective marker to identify ischemic lesions, and therefore patients, most likely to benefit from coronary revascularization . Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the most widely used pressure-derived invasive physiological index for coronary lesion assessment in contemporary clinical practice. FFR is calculated as the ratio of the mean distal coronary pressure (Pd) to the mean proximal coronary pressure (Pa) across a stenosis during maximal hyperaemia, a condition that is commonly achieved by the intracoronary or intravenous administration of a potent vasodilator agent, such as adenosine. Based on the results of landmark clinical trials, most recent guidelines recommend the use of FFR to identify hemodynamically significant coronary lesions in patients with stable CAD. Despite this, the worldwide adoption of FFR into current clinical practice remains limited , accounting for only 9.8% of coronary procedures in Switzerland . Potential reasons for the low adoption rate of coronary physiology include technical challenges and time consumption related to FFR measurements, inadequate or lack of reimbursement, physician preferences, patient-related discomfort, contraindications and costs associated with adenosine, or in certain countries, no availability of adenosine. The low use of FFR in clinical practice provided a rationale for the development of new invasive physiology indices. By negating the need for administration of pharmacologic agents such as adenosine, saving time, and reducing costs and side effects, hyperaemia-free pressure-derived physiological indices were developed to increase adoption of physiology-guided coronary revascularization into routine clinical practice.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 90
Est. completion date January 1, 2024
Est. primary completion date January 1, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Subject is =18 years of age. - Subject must be willing to sign a Patient Informed Consent (PIC). - Coronary artery disease with over 50% angiographic diameter stenosis on visual assessment, undergoing clinically indicated invasive physiological assessment by means of FFR. - Assessment of non culprit arteries with over 50% angiographic diameter stenosis on visual assessment, in patients presenting with NSTEMI. Exclusion Criteria: - Pregnant and/or breastfeeding females. - Known allergies to: heparin, contrast medium, adenosine. - Contra-indication to adenosine. - Severe renal failure (eGFR = 30 ml/min/m2). - Ostial stenosis in both the left and right coronary arteries. - Presence of a chronic total occlusion. - History of coronary artery bypass graft. - Acute coronary syndrome. - Acute myocardial infarction within the preceding two weeks. - Severe valvular heart disease. - Left main disease. - Documented left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) =30% as documented within maximum 6 months prior to the procedure. - Decompensated congestive heart failure. - Extreme hypotension (systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg) - Extreme bradycardia (<40 bpm).

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Saline Pd/Pa
Use of a =6F guiding catheter and the Verrata pressure guidewire. Administration of intracoronary nitroglycerin. Verrata normalisation and placement of the Verrata sensor =3 vessel-diameter beyond the stenosis. Whole cycle resting Pd/Pa and resting iFR measurements. Measurement of contrast FFR: record 5 baseline heart beats, injection of contrast media, 10 ml in the left coronary system, 8 ml in the right coronary system, measure minimal Pd/Pa under stable hyperaemia. Adenosine FFR: measurement: record 5 baseline heart beats, injection of intracoronary adenosine, 200 mcg in the left coronary system, 100 mcg in the right coronary system, measure minimal Pd/Pa under stable hyperaemia. Saline-induced Pd/Pa measurement: record 5 baseline heart beats, injection of saline using the ACIST system during 5 heart beats, measure minimal Pd/Pa under stable hyperaemia. Perform pressure guidewire pullback and check for drift: drift ±0.02 is accepted, if =0.03, repeat measurement.

Locations

Country Name City State
Switzerland Geneva University Hospitals Geneva

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University Hospital, Geneva

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Switzerland, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Saline Pd/Pa ratio As the patient will undergo invasive physiological assessment of an angiographic intermediate stenosis with fractional flow reserve (FFR), as per ESC guidelines recommendation (class of recommendation I, level of evidence A), we will perform measurement of saline Pd/Pa with the same pressure guidewire, requiring an additional 3-5 minutes and injection of 10 ml of saline. during the coronarography procedure
Primary Contrast Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) As the patient will undergo invasive physiological assessment of an angiographic intermediate stenosis with fractional flow reserve (FFR), as per ESC guidelines recommendation (class of recommendation I, level of evidence A), we will perform measurement of contrast fractional flow reserve (FFR) with the same pressure guidewire, requiring an additional 3-5 minutes and injection of 10 ml of contrast. during the coronarography procedure
Primary Adenosine Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) The patient will undergo invasive physiological assessment of an angiographic intermediate stenosis with fractional flow reserve (FFR), as per ESC guidelines recommendation (class of recommendation I, level of evidence A). during the coronarography procedure
Primary Resting Pd/Pa ratio As the patient will undergo invasive physiological assessment of an angiographic intermediate stenosis with fractional flow reserve (FFR), as per ESC guidelines recommendation (class of recommendation I, level of evidence A), we will perform measurement of Pd/Pa with the same pressure guidewire, requiring an additional 3-5 minutes. during the coronarography procedure
Primary Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) The patient will undergo invasive physiological assessment of an angiographic intermediate stenosis with instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), as per ESC guidelines recommendation (class of recommendation I, level of evidence A). during the coronarography procedure
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05846893 - Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT03427996 - Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety of Rotational Atherectomy in Routine Clinical Practice
Terminated NCT03175523 - HOW To Optimally Implant BioResorbable Scaffold - Intravascular Imaging Versus Quantitative Coronary Angiography Guidance N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04475380 - Complex All-comers and Patients With Diabetes or Prediabetes, Treated With Xience Sierra Everolimus-eluting Stents
Completed NCT01184183 - Trial Comparison of Accuseal and Bovine Pericardial Patch During Endarterectomy
Completed NCT00697372 - SEA-SIDE: Sirolimus Versus Everolimus-eluting Stent Randomized Assessment in Bifurcated Lesions and Clinical SIgnificance of Residual siDE-branch Stenosis Phase 4
Completed NCT05509296 - Compare the Effectiveness and Safety of Two Different Kinds of Cutting Balloon in Coronary Artery Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT03054324 - Validation of a Predictive Model of Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis
Enrolling by invitation NCT06194526 - Whole Blood Transcriptomic Signal According to Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Burden Assessed by CT Angiography
Not yet recruiting NCT06039748 - Angiography-Derived Quantitative Functional Assessment Versus Pressure-Derived FFR and IMR: The FAIR Study
Not yet recruiting NCT05753085 - Multimodality Optical and Ultrasound Intravascular Imaging for Stent Optimization and Atheroma Assessment N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05471687 - Evaluation of the Functional Impact of Coronary Stenoses in Diabetics by Spectral CT N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04569669 - The Sensitivity and Specificity of CardioSimFFRct Analysis Software on Coronary Artery Stenosis N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02508714 - Bioresorbable Polymer ORSIRO Versus Durable Polymer RESOLUTE ONYX Stents N/A
Completed NCT03301246 - Artimes Pro Low Profile Dilatation Catheters for Pre-Dilatation in Patients With Symptomatic Ischemic Heart Disease N/A
Completed NCT03606330 - Systemic, Pancoronary and Local Coronary Vulnerability
Completed NCT02870140 - Thin Strut Sirolimus-eluting Stent in All Comers Population vs Everolimus-eluting Stent N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06071702 - IonMAN II Trial- Early Feasibility Study of the IoNIR Ridaforolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System N/A
Completed NCT02275143 - Computed Tomography (CT) Coronary Angiogram Evaluation in Cancer Patients Having CT Thorax, Abdomen and Pelvis N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT01794065 - The Promus Element Rewards Study N/A