Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is controversial and not ubiquitously adopted across the units. There is no definitive evidence that the use of FFR improves early clinical outcomes after CABG, with the exception of a simplification of the procedure. FFR use may help in defining the indication to the use arterial grafts, but there is no evidence that preoperative FFR lead to any benefits in terms of patency when venous grafts are used.

On these grounds a large multicentric all-comers observational study is planned. The aim is to achieve a real-life picture of the FFR practice in CABG across several European and non-European units. This study will inform on the effective use rate of FFR in the CABG practice and its clinical effectiveness when compared to standard angiography-based CABG.


Clinical Trial Description

Background The use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is controversial. A large retrospective study on 627 patients by Toth et al. showed that FFR-guided surgery was associated with a lower number of graft anastomoses and a lower rate of on-pump surgery compared with angiography-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery. This did not result in a higher event rate during up to 36 months of follow-up and was associated with a lower rate of angina. The six years follow-up of the same study showed that FFR-guided CABG was associated with a significant reduction in the rate of overall death or myocardial infarction at 6-year follow-up as compared with angiography-guided CABG.

However, the three randomized studies on FFR-based CABG have achieved contradictive results. The FARGO (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography Randomization for Graft Optimization) and GRAFFITI (GRAft patency after FFR-guided versus angiography-guided CABG) did not report a significant impact on hard outcomes at 1 year. Conversely, the IMPAG trial support the use of preoperative FFR in total arterial CABG. Authors found a significant association between the preoperative FFR measurement of the target vessel and the anastomotic functionality at 6 months, with a cut-off of 0.78. Authors concluded that integration of FFR measurement into the preoperative diagnostic workup could lead to improved anastomotic graft function.

The currently available randomized evidences might have been flawed by limitations including underpowering, entry selectivity bias, cross over among treatment, difference in the type of conduits used and presence of unexpected confounders related to surgeons' reluctance to base their surgical strategy on FFR. These drawbacks not only hamper the reliability of the results, but more importantly, reduce their translatability to the real-life clinical world.

Given the lack of definitive evidences and the difficulty of RCT to capture the real-life scenario of the clinical practice, we plan to perform a large multicentric all-comers study comparing the practice of FFR in CABG across several European and non-European units.

The main aim is to obtain information on

- Use rate of FFR in preoperative planning of surgical candidates

- Effective adherence to FFR guidance during elective surgery and identification of factors eventually limiting observance to FFR information

- Short and long-term outcomes of FFR-based CABG in comparison to standard angiography-based CABG

- Post hoc analysis in relation to type of conduit used, completeness of revascularization, surgeon experience, volume/outcome relationship. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04379947
Study type Observational
Source University of Glasgow
Contact
Status Withdrawn
Phase
Start date May 2020
Completion date January 2021

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06030596 - SPECT Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fraction Flow Reserve
Completed NCT04080700 - Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach (KODRA)
Recruiting NCT03810599 - Patient-reported Outcomes in the Bergen Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Study N/A
Recruiting NCT06002932 - Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06032572 - Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE) N/A
Recruiting NCT04242134 - Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions N/A
Recruiting NCT05308719 - Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery N/A
Completed NCT04556994 - Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Lower Limb Paddling Effects in Post CABG Patients. N/A
Recruiting NCT05846893 - Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT06027788 - CTSN Embolic Protection Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05023629 - STunning After Balloon Occlusion N/A
Completed NCT04941560 - Assessing the Association Between Multi-dimension Facial Characteristics and Coronary Artery Diseases
Completed NCT04006288 - Switching From DAPT to Dual Pathway Inhibition With Low-dose Rivaroxaban in Adjunct to Aspirin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Phase 4
Completed NCT01860274 - Meshed Vein Graft Patency Trial - VEST N/A
Recruiting NCT06174090 - The Effect of Video Education on Pain, Anxiety and Knowledge Levels of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Patients N/A
Completed NCT03968809 - Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
Terminated NCT03959072 - Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
Recruiting NCT04566497 - Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up. N/A
Recruiting NCT05065073 - Iso-Osmolar vs. Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography Phase 4
Completed NCT05096442 - Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Coronary De Novo Lesions N/A