Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Active, not recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT02030990 |
Other study ID # |
NMCSD.2014.0032 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Active, not recruiting |
Phase |
Phase 2/Phase 3
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
August 2014 |
Est. completion date |
July 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
April 2022 |
Source |
United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
1. Purpose To evaluate the use of mitomycin-C (MMC) as an intraoperative adjunct during
photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), its effect on postoperative healing and its ability
to reduce the postoperative topical steroid course after the surgery.
2. Research Design This is a single-center, prospective, comparative cohort study.
3. Hypothesis There will not be a significant difference in the refractive corrections
amongst the treatment groups, 12 months after surgery.
4. Objectives The primary study objective is to compare the effect of intraoperative MMC
and a postoperative short topical steroid taper of 3 weeks, intraoperative MMC and a
rapid topical steroid taper of 1 week, and a more commonly accepted postoperative
regimen of a 2 month long topical steroid taper without any intraoperative MMC. The
primary endpoint evaluated will be objective estimates of refractive error (WaveScan
WaveFront™ System) at 12 months post-surgery. Secondarily, the extent of haze formation
will be evaluated objectively using densitometry maps generated by automated Scheimpflug
imaging of the cornea (Pentacam®). Furthermore, the subjective vision from the patients'
perspective will be evaluated by questionnaires.
Description:
1. Purpose To evaluate the use of mitomycin-C (MMC) as an intraoperative adjunct during
photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), its effect on postoperative healing and its ability
to reduce the postoperative topical steroid course after the surgery.
2. Research Design This is a single-center, prospective, comparative cohort study.
3. Hypothesis There will not be a significant difference in the refractive corrections
amongst the treatment groups, 12 months after surgery.
4. Objectives The primary study objective is to compare the effect of intraoperative MMC
and a postoperative short topical steroid taper of 3 weeks, intraoperative MMC and a
rapid topical steroid taper of 1 week, and a more commonly accepted postoperative
regimen of a 2 month long topical steroid taper without any intraoperative MMC. The
primary endpoint evaluated will be objective estimates of refractive error (WaveScan
WaveFront™ System) at 12 months post-surgery. Secondarily, the extent of haze formation
will be evaluated objectively using densitometry maps generated by automated Scheimpflug
imaging of the cornea (Pentacam®). Furthermore, the subjective vision from the patients'
perspective will be evaluated by questionnaire.
5. Methodology At the Navy Refractive Surgery Center San Diego (NRSC SD), a total of 300
patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned to three cohorts. PRK will be performed
in a standard fashion for all treatment groups. In the first two groups, intraoperative
MMC 0.01% for a contact time of 15 seconds will be utilized. During the postoperative
period, the first cohort will use the short steroid taper and the second cohort will use
the rapid steroid taper. The third cohort will not receive any intraoperative MMC and
will self-administer postoperative steroids, tapering for two months. All cohorts will
be followed at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the procedure.
Standard clinical measures of visual performance will be recorded. Since visually
significant corneal haze is relatively rare, corneal densitometry will be used as an
objective measure to detect subclinical corneal haze in addition to our usual subjective
haze evaluation done by the clinical optometrists.
The patients will complete a voluntary questionnaire that evaluates their subjective
impression of the refractive surgery, their recovery and their outcomes. Specifically, the
patient will report the use of refractive correction, usefulness of the surgery at work, dry
eye complaints, and subjective appraisal of their vision.