View clinical trials related to COPD Exacerbation.
Filter by:Mast cells proteases such as chymase and tryptase will be studied in the tissue of small and large airways in COPD patients
A 12 month interventional study of up to 1,050 people with COPD to determine if the NuvoAir virtual-first clinical service leads to fewer moderate and severe COPD exacerbations and cardiac events, reduces healthcare utilization, and lowers the total cost of care compared to a control cohort that receives standard care only.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic lung disease affecting approximately 10% of the adult population globally. COPD is recognised to be an important area of focus, as part of one of the healthcare challenges defined by the Office of Life Sciences. Patients with COPD often experience exacerbations which are triggered episodes leading to disease worsening. Exacerbations are associated with increased morbidity and a risk of mortality. Severe exacerbations, where patients are hospitalised, are of particular concern to patients, carers and healthcare givers. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends that hospital clinicians looking after patients with COPD should provide rescue packs (a course of prednisolone and antibiotics) and a basic management plan to patients on discharge. It is recognised that there is a high-risk 90-day period to patients with COPD following discharge from hospital, where there is a 43% risk of readmission and a 12% risk of mortality; however repeated national audit data has shown that, despite NICE recommendations this high risk of readmission and mortality has not changed. A multicentre randomised clinical trial of 1400 patients will be conducted in 30 acute NHS trusts. This will test the hypothesis that a self-supported rescue pack management plan consisting of rescue packs + written self-management plan + twice weekly telephone/text symptom alert assessments in the high-risk 90-day period is better than standard care in reducing 90-day readmission by 20%. If successful, this intervention would be rapidly implementable, improve patient clinical outcomes and have a cost saving of approximately £350 million per annum.
The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to compare telehealth and onsite supervised maintenance exercise program for adults with COPD. The specific aims of the study are: - To compare 8-week supervised maintenance program delivered onsite and via tele-rehab with no maintenance for patients with COPD following discharge from traditional exercise or physical therapy or onsite outpatient rehabilitation programs on clinical outcomes (dyspnea, exercise capacity, physical function, physical activity, and quality of life) at 8 weeks and 4-months post-intervention. - To compare the differences in dyspnea, exercise capacity, physical function, physical activity, and quality of life between an 8-week maintenance program delivered onsite and via tele-rehab at 8-weeks and 4-months post-intervention in patients with COPD following discharge from traditional onsite outpatient rehabilitation. Participants in both intervention groups (onsite and tele-rehab) will undergo a baseline onsite assessment followed by an 8-week supervised exercise intervention either onsite or in a telehealth setting. Control group will receive biweekly check in calls, but no active intervention.
The objective of this prospective observational study is to describe the epidemiological, clinical and biological characteristics of admitted patients in ICU for severe acute exacerbation of COPD, to assess the different therapeutics used, to evaluate the prognosis of patients with short, medium and long term ( 1 year) and the various factors associated with survival in ICU
A sub-nasal mask with a skirt that fits the nostrils and with a dedicated port for the nasogastric tube has recently been introduced. This interface has never been compared to nasal-oral masks. We hypothesise that such a sub-nasal mask increases comfort compared to a conventional naso-oral mask. The primary objective is to compare the comfort of the sub-nasal mask with that of a standard naso-oral mask.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test if treatment with prehospital Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF), due to acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) based on in-hospital criteria, should be used in the prehospital setting. This is performed with the introduction of prehospital arterial blood gas analyzation. The primary objective is: • To determine if early prehospital applied NIV together with standard medical treatment will affect arterial pH at hospital arrival in patients with ARF due to AECOPD. Participants in the intervention will receive Non-invasive ventilation together with standard medical treatment. The intervention will be compared to standard medical treatment alone, that may include inhaled bronchodilators, intravenous corticosteroids, and titrated oxygen supplementation.
Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is defined acute worsening of respiratory symptoms requiring additional therapy. COPD exacerbations affects the health status and quality of life of affected patients. The inpatient mortality during exacerbation is 3 to 4% while, intensive care unit (ICU) mortality approaches 43 to 46%. Each episode of exacerbation increases the risk of mortality subsequently(1) Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) therapy has established role in mild to moderate exacerbations of COPD. But the use of NIV therapy outside of acute exacerbation is uncertain(2) NIV use has been shown to prevent endotracheal intubation and improved hospital and ICU survival. NIV decreases the work of breathing by unloading the respiratory muscles through assisting the inspiratory phases and counterbalancing the intrinistic positive end expiratory positive pressure (ipeep)(3). NIV is delivered through face mask, although newer interfaces like helmet available(3). Tradionally pressure targeted mode is used in NIV therapy and is often given intermittently rather than continuously(4). NIV therapy via face mask was first used by Meduri et. Al in acute respiratory failure patients. Subsequent multiple randomized control trials established the role of NIV therapy in better gas exchange, reducing PCO2, reducing endotracheal intubation thereby reducing mortality, length of stay in hospital(3). NIV-PSV (pressure support ventilation) consists of 2 pressures. IPAP (inspiratory positive airway pressure) and EPAP (expiratory positive airway pressure) or PEEP. Pressure support is usually the pressure added above PEEP. Pressure support is usually started with 8-10 cm H2O to obtain a tidal volume of 6-8ml/kg ideal body weight. EPAP/PEEP is adjusted to counterbalance the iPEEP. It is usually kept at 4-6cm H2O. Fio2 is kept to maintain saturation of 88-92%. Inspiratory trigger is usually set at 1 L/min. Expiratory trigger kept at 50%. Back up rate should always be kept usually lower than the patient respiratory rate 10-12 breaths/min(5). Adaptive support ventilation (ASV) is a new method of closed loop ventilation which can switch back between pressure support and pressure control modes of ventilation. Based on the ideal body weight and % of minute volume ventilation given, the ASV mode choses the best tidal volume and respiratory rate according to the patient lung mechanics by calculating expiratory time constant (RCe) through expiratory flow volume curve(6). Since closed loop system, being a completely automated system, prevent frequent adjustment by clinician and thereby increasing the time and capacity of medical staff. The first application of such closed loop system in mechanical ventilation was done by saxton in1953 in iron lung for regulation of etCO2(7). Studies published on ASV as non-invasive mode of ventilation is limited. In a feasibility study, it has been shown that ASV can be used in non-invasive mode of ventilation with similar results to PSV in COPD patients(8).
Aim is to to demonstrate that the ResAppDx v2.0 algorithms provide an accurate diagnosis of respiratory disease in the study's clinical setting compared to a clinical adjudication committee's (CAC) diagnosis; and to establish a baseline for the resource use and cost of current care pathways for respiratory disease diagnosis in an emergency department. Eligible subjects will be consented/enrolled and their subject reported signs/symptoms of respiratory disease will be recorded in the study electronic case report form (eCRF). The enrolled subject's cough sounds will be captured (5 cough sounds are required) using the ResAppDx v2.0 Investigational Device (ID) software installed on a study smartphone; cough sounds may be voluntary and/or involuntary/spontaneous. As this is an observational study the treating team will be blinded to the ResAppDx v2.0 diagnoses. Additional medical information will be collected from the treating team, from the subject and from the subject's medical record. No follow-up/subsequent visits with the subject will be required by the study. As an efficacy comparator, a clinical adjudication committee (CAC) will determine the final clinical diagnosis using the disease case definitions, eCRF data and the subject's medical record. Information on time and scope of tests and consults ordered by the treating team will be recorded to set a baseline for resource use and cost of current standard of care treatment/assessment procedures. This data will allow future health economics analyses to be performed. The blinded ResAppDx v2.0 diagnoses will be unblinded after database lock and sensitivity and specificity will be calculated for the ResAppDx v2.0 diagnoses compared to agreement with the CAC's final clinical diagnoses.
Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is understood as a complex and heterogeneous syndrome, which requires an increasingly personalized approach. A new approach to AECOPD recognized that several etiopathogenic mechanisms can lead to a worsening ot the patients. This new approach is based on the identification of different treatable traits (TTs). The goal of this observational study is to describe how TTs are distributed in patients with AECOPD in primary care (PC) and hospital emergencies department (HED) to address their complexity and heterogeneity. As a secondary outcomes we also try to evaluate the relationship of TTs with relevant clinical outcomes (relapse, recurrence, MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event) and all-cause mortality) and create a risk score and compare this new severity score with Rome and GesEPOC proposals. In the AP group, a series of basic tests for routine use will be systematically performed, among which chest x-ray, electrocardiogram and other new tests such as microspirometry (COPD-6) and a point of care determination of capillary C-reactive protein (CRP). In the HED group routine determinations will be expanded to include blood tests, arterial blood gases and biomarkers (CRP, TnT, NT-proBNP and D-Dimer). Patients will be re-evaluated 90 days after the initial episode, to evaluate different clinical outcomes. The estimated sample size is 400 patients.