Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Suspended
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03106454 |
Other study ID # |
HS-09-00669 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Suspended |
Phase |
Phase 3
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
August 2014 |
Est. completion date |
January 2024 |
Study information
Verified date |
January 2023 |
Source |
University of Southern California |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Since the introduction of the combined hormonal contraceptive pill, dosages of ethinyl
estradiol (EE) have steadily decreased from more than 150mcg to 20mcg in an attempt to
improve the risk profile associated with the COC. In 2010, the Food and Drug Administration
approved a oral contraceptive pill containing EE 10mcg/NET acetate 1mg (Tradename Lo
loestrin). However, no studies have compared this formulation to pills containing either
higher doses of estrogen or progestin alone. It is not known whether EE 10mcg is sufficient
to prevent follicular development or to support the endometrium as well as higher doses of
EE. This trial addresses the question of whether an oral contraceptive pill with EE
10mcg/Norethindrone acetate 1mg will better suppress ovulation or have a better side effect
profile than a progestin only pill with a nearly equal dose of norethindrone.
Description:
Use of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) containing estrogen is associated with venous
thromboembolic events. In an effort to decrease the risks of estrogen, the dose of ethinyl
estradiol (EE) contained in combined oral contraceptive (COC) pills has decrease
substantially from >100mcg to 20mcg. In 2012, a COC with only 10mcg of EE (Tradename
LoLoestrin) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration. However, no studies have
compared this formulation to pills containing progestin alone to determine if this very low
dose of EE decreases ovulation or improves unscheduled uterine bleeding beyond what is seen
with a progestin only pill (POP).
We aim to compare a COC with EE 10mcg/norethindrone (NET) acetate 1mg to a POP containing a
nearly equal amount of progestin (norethindrone 1.05mg). The objective of the study is to
compare the incidence of ovulation among users of a COC with only EE10mcg/NET acetate 1mg to
users of a POP with a nearly identical progestin dose of NET 1.05mg. We plan to recruit 58
women between the ages of 18 and 45 years old, who are ovulatory at baseline based on serum
progesterone levels. Subjects will be randomized to take either a COC containing EE 10mcg/NET
acetate 1mg or a POP containing NET 1.05mg for one month. During the month of study
treatment, we will measure ovulation incidence using a single serum progesterone levels of
>=4.0ng/dl, sperm penetration of cervical mucus using the Eggert Kruse classification system,
pill compliance by NET serum levels, and side effects including unscheduled uterine bleeding
via subject daily diaries.
Our primary outcome, ovulation incidence, will be compared between study arms. Secondary
outcomes will compare cervical mucus quality, sperm penetration of cervical mucus, side
effects (including uterine bleeding), and pill compliance between users of these two pills.