A Multicenter Trial to Evaluate the Insertion Characteristics of the Radiopaque Etonogestrel Implant Using a Next Generation Applicator (34530)(P05702)

Contraception Clinical Trial

Official title:

An Open-Label, Non-Controlled Multicenter Trial to Evaluate the Insertion Characteristics of the Radiopaque Etonogestrel Implant Using a Next Generation Applicator

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00620035
• Other study ID #: P05702
• Secondary ID: 34530
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• Start date: March 2007
• Est. completion date: October 2010

Study information

• Verified date: February 2022
• Source: Organon and Co
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of the next generation applicator and its instructions for proper insertion of the Radiopaque Implant. Secondary objectives include: evaluation of implant removal, evaluation of the overall contraceptive efficacy and safety of the Radiopaque Implant, assessment of x -ray visibility of the Radiopaque Implant, and to assess participant expectations and satisfaction with the Radiopaque Implant.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 301
• Est. completion date: October 2010
• Est. primary completion date: October 2010
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 18 Years to 40 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Woman of at least (>=) 18 but not older than (<= )40 years of age at the time of screening;

• Good physical and mental health;

• Regular cycles with a usual length between 24 and 35 days;

• Body mass index >= 18 and <= 35 kg/m^2;

• Willing to give informed consent in writing.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Contraindications:

• known or suspected pregnancy;

• active venous thromboembolic disorder (e.g. deep vein thrombosis,

pulmonary embolism);

• presence or history of severe hepatic disease as long as liver function values have not returned to normal;

• malignancy or pre-malignancy, if sex-steroid-influenced;

• undiagnosed vaginal bleeding;

• hypersensitivity to any of the components of Radiopaque Implant.

• Hypertension, i.e. systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg;

• A history during pregnancy or during previous use of sex steroids of: jaundice and/or severe pruritus related to cholestasis, gallstone formation, porphyria, systemic lupus erythematosus, haemolytic uraemic syndrome, Sydenham's chorea, herpes gestationis, otosclerosis-related hearing loss;

• Present use or use during 2 months prior to the start of Radiopaque Implant of one of the following drugs: phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone, carbamazepine, rifampicin, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, felbamate, ritonavir, nelfinavir, griseofulvin or the herbal remedy St John's wort;

• Administration of investigational drugs within 2 months prior to the start of Radiopaque Implant

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Contraception

Intervention

Drug:
• Radiopaque Etonogestrel Implant
One implant inserted for a 3-year treatment period

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Organon and Co

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Percentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Design & Technical Aspects	In order to evaluate efficacy and ease of use of the Next Generation Applicator (NGA), the investigator/applicator user (AU) completed a User Satisfaction Questionnaire on Day 1 after the 12th implant insertion. The domain, 'Design/technical aspects' consisted of five questions: fit of the applicator in the hand, size, weight, handling, and color of the applicator were assessed. The percentage of AUs who were very satisfied and satisfied was presented.	Day 1
Primary	Percentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Functionality	In order to evaluate efficacy and ease of use of the NGA, the investigator/AU completed a User Satisfaction Questionnaire on Day 1 after the 12th implant insertion. The domain, 'Functionality' consisted of six questions assessing functionality of the needle. The percentage of AUs who were very satisfied and satisfied was presented.	Day 1
Primary	Percentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire by Domain: Safety	In order to evaluate efficacy and ease of use of the NGA, the investigator/AU completed a User Satisfaction Questionnaire on Day 1 after the 12th implant insertion. The domain, 'Safety' consisted of three questions: removal of the protection cap from applicator, full retraction of the needle into the applicator after insertion, difference in colors of the obturator & the implant. The percentage of AUs who were very satisfied and satisfied was presented.	Day 1
Primary	Percentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Used Time	In order to evaluate efficacy and ease of use of the NGA, the investigator/AU completed a User Satisfaction Questionnaire on Day 1 after the 12th implant insertion. The domain, 'Used Time' consisted of one question: insertion time was assessed. The percentage of AUs who were very satisfied and satisfied was presented.	Day 1
Primary	Percentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Applicator Satisfaction	In order to evaluate efficacy and ease of use of the NGA, the investigator/AU completed a User Satisfaction Questionnaire on Day 1 after the 12th implant insertion. The domain, 'Applicator Satisfaction' consisted of one question in order to assess the applicator. The percentage of AUs who were very satisfied and satisfied was presented.	Day 1
Primary	Implant Insertion Time (Seconds)	The implant insertion time was the time expressed in seconds, from removal of the protection cap from the applicator until retraction of the needle from the arm after insertion. Data was presented for overall investigators including experienced and non-experienced.	Day 1
Primary	Implant Removal Time (Seconds)	The implant removal time was the time expressed in seconds, from making the removal incision until placing the butterfly closure. Data was presented for overall investigators including experienced and non-experienced.	Day 1