View clinical trials related to Contraception.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to study the effect of Drospirenone on cervical mucus change by modified Insler score, pre-bariatric surgery and post-bariatric surgery
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether bariatric surgery affects Drospirenone only pills absorption
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate how differences in specific parts of our DNA can influence how our bodies break down the hormones contained within oral contraceptive pills, which could affect how well these birth control pills work to prevent pregnancy. We also interested in exploring how these differences in our DNA can also explain why patients taking the exact same formulation of birth control pill will experience very different side effects. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Do individuals with the CYP3A7*1C variant have increased metabolism of both desogestrel and ethinyl estradiol when taking a combined oral contraceptive pill? - Do individuals with the CYP3A7*1C variant experience higher rates of breakthrough ovulation while taking a desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol combined oral contraceptive pill? - What novel genetic loci are associated with alterations in steroid hormone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics among a larger cohort of combined oral contraceptive pill users? Participants will take a specific formulation of combined oral contraceptive pill (desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol) and undergo the following procedures: - Blood draw to measure the amount of progestin and estrogen in their system from the combined oral contraceptive pill - Questionnaires to assess side effects possibly caused by the combined oral contraceptive pill - Blood draw to measure endogenous hormone levels and biomarkers that may be affected by the combined oral contraceptive pill - A transvaginal ultrasound to measure any ovarian follicles (optional procedure)
family planning is avital primary Health care intervention that saves lives of mothers and infants empowers women and support their choices regarding their health public life and additional education .In addition family planning is considered as a short term intervention to limit population growth and manage overpopulation problems.Globally the contraception prevalance rate an indicator for family planning programs continue to face challenges in developing countries.
To increase sexual and reproductive health and rights through the improvement of contraceptive counseling and easy access to service and, thus, women's use of effective contraceptives after purchase of an emergency contraceptive pill (ECP).
The goal of this study is to understand whether providing information to women with a strong desire to avoid future pregnancy about how tubal sterilization compares to long-acting reversible contraceptives improves perceived access to available contraceptives. Participants will: - Complete a baseline survey - Receive access to web-based educational resources - Complete a brief follow up survey immediately after exploring these web-based resources - Complete a follow-up survey 3 months after enrolling The investigators will compare outcomes among participants provided with access to a new website (intervention) summarizing recent patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) comparing interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization and long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) to control participants provided with access to the existing Planned Parenthood website on tubal sterilization.
The combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing estetrol (E4) and drospirenone (DRSP) (E4/DRSP) is a novel oral contraceptive containing a fixed dose of E4 (14.2 mg) and DRSP (3 mg). The proposed study will address post-market requirements for E4/DRSP under section 505(o) in response to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) request. The primary objective of the study is to characterize and compare the risks of E4/DRSP with EE/DRSP and E4/DRSP with a pooled cohort of users of EE/LNG, EE/NETA, and EE/NGM combinations (non-DRSP-containing COCs) in a study population of actual users of these preparations under routine clinical practice. The main clinical outcome of interest is VTE.
High-quality contraceptive counseling can strengthen global efforts to reduce the unmet need for and suboptimal use of modern contraceptives. This study aims to identify a package of contraceptive counseling interventions for Pakistan and Nigeria designed to strengthen existing contraceptive services and determine its effectiveness in increasing clients' level of decision-making autonomy and meeting their contraceptive needs.
This is a prospective cohort study of individuals purchasing the oral contraceptive pill over the counter (OTC) in pharmacies in 32 US states. The comparison group is people receiving a prescription (Rx) for oral contraception. Both groups will be followed for one year to examine contraceptive continuation rates. This study will also identify who is using the pill OTC and why and evaluate differences in pregnancy intention and measures of contraceptive agency between the two groups.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effectiveness of evidence-based Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) among adult patients who screen positive to one or more risky alcohol or substance use behaviors while seeking care at a sexual and reproductive health (SRH) clinic. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does SBIRT impact patients' alcohol and substance use, SRH, mental health, physical health, quality of life, and wellbeing? - Does SBIRT effectiveness differ by ethnicity, socioeconomic status, age, gender, and urbanicity? - Does SBIRT effectiveness differ by delivery mode (in-person vs. telemedicine)? Participants will receive in-person SBIRT, telemedicine SBIRT, or usual care. Participants will complete surveys at interviews at baseline, 30 days, and 3 months. Researchers will compare patients who received SBIRT to patients who receive usual care to see if patients who receive the SBIRT intervention have a greater reduction in negative outcomes as compared to those who receive usual care. In this setting, usual care consists of basic quantity and frequency questions asked inconsistently as part of the admission process and varying by provider, with no standardized approach to screening, treatment, follow-up, or referral.