Clinical Trials Logo

Constriction, Pathologic clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Constriction, Pathologic.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT02039115 Completed - Esophageal Stenosis Clinical Trials

Reduction in Symptomatic Esophageal Stricture Formation

Start date: March 2014
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Complete endoscopic resection of early neoplastic BE is a curative procedure. However, a significant proportion of patients develop symptomatic esophageal strictures following CBE, and this limits the technique, particularly for circumferential and longer segment disease. Oral steroid therapy may reduce stricture formation; thereby allowing CBE to be performed with minimal associated morbidity.

NCT ID: NCT02006901 Completed - Spinal Stenosis Clinical Trials

Comparative Effectiveness of Microdecompression and Laminectomy for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Start date: January 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Introduction: This observational study is designed to test the equivalence between the clinical effectiveness of microdecompression and laminectomy in the surgical treatment of central lumbar spinal stenosis. Lumbar spinal stenosis is the most frequent indication for spinal surgery in the elderly, and as the oldest segment of the population continues to grow its prevalence is likely to increase. However, data on surgical outcomes are limited. Open or wide decompressive laminectomy, often combined with medial facetectomy and foraminotomy, was formerly the standard treatment. In recent years a growing tendency towards less invasive decompressive procedures has emerged. Many spine surgeons today perform microdecompression for central lumbar spinal stenosis. Prospectively registered treatment and outcome data are obtained from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine).

NCT ID: NCT02000999 Completed - Pancreatic Cancer Clinical Trials

Diagnosis of Bile Duct Strictures

Start date: November 2013
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The purpose of this prospective study is to compare the diagnostic utility of two techniques (brush cytology + FISH and brush cytology + free DNA analysis) in the diagnosis of biliary strictures. Histologic diagnosis (biopsies) in conjunction with clinical and/or imaging follow-up will serve as the gold standard for diagnosis of malignancy. In order to do this the investigators will ask study participants to have a small volume of fluid obtained from the bile duct sent for additional testing at RedPATH. In some patients additional brushings will be obtained for FISH testing (this adds <2 minutes to ERCP and only associated risk is increased procedure duration). The investigators hypothesize that the use of cytology +DNA analysis has a higher sensitivity and accuracy when compared to cytology +FISH in patients with biliary strictures. Primary aim: To compare the sensitivity and accuracy of the two techniques (brush cytology + FISH and brush cytology + free DNA analysis). Histologic diagnosis (histology from biopsy or cytology for fine needle aspiration) in conjunction with clinical and/or imaging follow-up will serve as the gold standard for diagnosis of malignancy. Secondary aims: 1. To evaluate the diagnostic yield of malignancy when all three techniques (cytology, FISH and DNA analysis) are used. 2. To evaluate the added value of biliary forceps biopsies, when used in conjunction with cytology, FISH and DNA analysis.

NCT ID: NCT01995487 Completed - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Stenosis

Study of BioNIR Drug Eluting Stent System in Coronary Stenosis

BIONICS
Start date: January 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The BioNIR study aims to show that the BioNIR ridaforolimus eluting stent is non-inferior to the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent for the primary clinical endpoint of target lesion failure (TLF) at 12 months; that it is non-inferior to the Resolute for the secondary endpoint of angiographic in-stent late loss at 13 months; and that it is more cost-effective.

NCT ID: NCT01994512 Completed - Clinical trials for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Swedish Spinal Stenosis Study

SSSS
Start date: October 2006
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

A national randomized multicentre trial (RCT) where decompression is compared with decompression with simultaneous fusion in 245 patients with spinal stenosis on one or two adjacent lumbar levels with or without degenerative olisthesis. The material is stratified for the existence of degenerative olisthesis >3mm. Monitoring is performed with clinical results from patient surveys after 2 and five years, and with radiological follow-up (MRI, CT and plain X-ray) and an objective function test (6 min walking test) after 2 years. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in results between the two interventions.

NCT ID: NCT01994330 Completed - Clinical trials for Severe Aortic Stenosis

Severe Aortic Stenosis and Acquired Von Willebrand´s Disease: The Impact of Desmopressin in Valve-Replacement Surgery

Start date: June 2009
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Acquired Von Willebrand disease (type 2A) has been described in patients with severe aortic stenosis, the association of aortic stenosis and Digestive bleeding due to this phenomena has received the name of Heye´s syndrome. We propose that administering Desmopressin (DDAVP) in patients scheduled to aortic valve replacement surgery will reduce blood loss and transfusion rate. this was a pilot study

NCT ID: NCT01987622 Completed - Spinal Stenosis Clinical Trials

Acupuncture for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Start date: November 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Acupuncture is widely used to manage chronic low back pain. Mounting evidence suggests the beneficial effects of acupuncture for mitigating chronic low back pain with acceptable minor adverse events. However, little information exists regarding the effects and safety of acupuncture for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, one of the spinal disorders that present chronic low back and leg pain. The investigators aimed to assess the overall effectiveness, safety, and feasibility of acupuncture in combination with usual care (as opposed to usual care alone) for patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. The hypotheses of this study are as follows: 1. A set of acupuncture sessions in combination with usual care can provide greater functional improvements than usual care alone . 2. A set of acupuncture sessions in combination with usual care can provide greater pain reduction than usual care alone . The study aims to include 50 participants (25 in the acupuncture group and 25 in the usual care group).

NCT ID: NCT01968122 Completed - Ischemic Stroke Clinical Trials

Registry Study of Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis in China

Start date: September 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

The SAMMPRIS suggested that aggressive treatment was superior to intravascular stenting in patients with severe symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) due to high complication rate in patients in stenting group. However the intravascular therapy is going on because of low complication rate in considerable Chinese studies coming from several high volume stroke centers. Given to 12.2% patients failing to aggressive medical therap in the SAMMPRIS study, it is imperative to performing an multiple prospective registry study of stenting for patients with ICAS in China.

NCT ID: NCT01947478 Completed - Clinical trials for Femoral Artery Occlusion

MDT-2113 Drug-Eluting Balloon vs. Standard PTA for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery

MDT-2113 SFA
Start date: September 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this trial is to assess the safety and efficacy of MDT-2113 for the interventional treatment of de novo and non-stented restenotic lesions in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and the proximal popliteal artery (PPA) as compared to treatment with standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).

NCT ID: NCT01943435 Completed - Clinical trials for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Study Comparing 3 Different Treatments for Arthritis of the Lower Back (Lumbar Spinal Stenosis)

Start date: November 20, 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal stenosis - known by patients as "arthritis of the spine" - is a condition that is very common; found in about 30% of older adults. It is the most common reason for people over the age of 65 to have back surgery. Some patients with stenosis do not need back surgery and can be treated with other methods, such as physical therapy, chiropractic, exercise, and medication. But we just don't have enough good research to tell us which treatment works best for which patient and under which circumstances. This research study hopes to provide more information about the effectiveness of the various non-surgical choices for managing stenosis. OBJECTIVES: This study will directly compare the effectiveness of three common non-surgical treatment approaches for stenosis: 1. Medical care that involves prescription medications and/or spinal injections (epidurals) 2. Group exercise in supervised classes given in a community center setting 3. Hands-on (manual) therapy and rehabilitative exercises given in a clinic setting by physical therapists and chiropractors METHODS: This research study will involve 259 adults who are at least 60 years old and have been diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis. The research volunteers will be divided into three groups, each group receiving one of the 3 types of treatments listed above under "Objectives". The determination of which type of treatment each person receives will be determined by chance, using a computerized version of flipping a coin. This is a process known as randomization, which scientists think reduces the bias in research studies. A series of tests and questionnaires will be given to the patients before and after they get treatment and comparisons will be made to see how much improvement they made with each of the types of treatments. Finally, the researchers will compare the differences between the 3 treatment groups to see if certain types of treatment produced better results than others, and if there were any examination findings that could be used to predict which type of patient would do better with which type of treatment.