View clinical trials related to Conjunctivitis.
Filter by:Intranasal corticosteroids are accepted as safe and effective first-line therapy for allergic rhinitis, especially in treatment of persistent symptoms. Budesonide, a non-halogenic glucocorticoid, is widely used in the management of inflammatory mucosal diseases like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma and allergic rhinitis. It is a highly fat-soluble substance with low water solubility and is presented as dispersion in marketed nasal sprays, like Rhinocort aqua 64. The maximum therapeutic efficacy of Rhinocort aqua is obtained after an application period of 7 to 14 days. In Budesolv, the solubility of budesonide is considerably increased suggesting that the same therapeutic efficacy can be reached with a lower dose. Better bioavailability of the dissolved drug promise an earlier onset of therapeutic efficacy. The current trial is undertaken to demonstrate these two effects. Subjects suffering from grass pollen allergic rhinitis will be challenged with grass pollen in a challenge chamber. Allergic subjects will be treated with two actuations (50 μl) of respective study treatment into each nostril once daily for 8 days. The total daily budesonide dose will be 40 μg per subject for Budesolv 10 and 256 μg per subject for Rhinocort® aqua 64. The primary objective of the study is to show non-inferiority of Budesolv 10 to Rhinocort® aqua 64. On day 8 grass pollen allergic patients will be challenged with grass pollen over a period of 6 hours and subjective nasal symptoms (congestion, sneezing, itching, rhinorrhea) as well as objective symptoms (nasal airflow, nasal secretion) will be assessed every 15 minutes. The second objective of the trial is to demonstrate an early on-set of therapeutic efficacy of Budesolv 10 compared to Rhinocort aqua. On day 1, grass pollen allergic patients will be challenged with grass pollen allergen in the challenge chamber over a period of 6 hours. After 1 hour 45 minutes, patients will receive their first dosage of the respective nasal spray treatment. During the 6 hour grass pollen challenge, subjective and objective endpoints will be measured every 15 minutes. To eliminate an individual bias based on expectations, the effect and onset of action is also compared to the effects of a suitable placebo. The same set of study participants will receive all three interventions in three consecutive treatment periods.
This is a search strategy for determining the prevalence of ocular complications in inflammatory rheumatic diseases for the purposes of a meta analysis.
A Phase 2, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Masked Study to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of IVIEW-1201 (1.0% Povidone-Iodine) Gel Forming Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Placebo in the Treatment of Adenoviral Conjunctivitis
An Exploratory Clinical Trial Evaluating Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solutions (0.25% and 0.5%) in Subjects with Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis Using the Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC)
TX-SMILE is an investigator-initiated, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intra-lymphatic administration of an approved allergenic extract for the immunotherapy treatment of allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis due to pollen from the conifer Mountain Cedar.
A Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Vehicle-Controlled, Methodology Development Environmental Clinical Trial with Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solutions (0.25% and 0.5%) in Subjects with Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis.
The primary purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension compared to vehicle (placebo) in subjects who have a documented clinical diagnosis of dry eye disease. The product will be studied over 14 days, with 1-2 drops instilled in each eye four times daily (QID).
The French guidelines for the use of Rifamycine eye drops in delivery room to prevent neonatal conjunctivitis have been actualized. Only newborns exposed to risk factors of conjunctivitis should be treated, compared to previous guidelines, treating all newborns. currently, there are no data describing risk factors for neonatal conjunctivitis. This study evaluated the incidence of conjunctivitis with or without Rifamycine eye drops treatment in the delivery room. Then risk factors for neonatal conjunctivitis where analyzed.
Phase I clinical trial, to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the ophthalmic solution PRO-174 versus Sophixín Ofteno®, elaborated by Laboratorios Sophia, S.A. of C.V. on the ocular surface of ophthalmologically and clinically healthy subjects. Goals: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of the formulation PRO-174 manufactured by Laboratorios Sophia, S.A. of C.V. on the ocular surface of clinically healthy subjects. Hypothesis: The ophthalmic solution PRO-174 presents a safety and tolerability profile similar to the comparator in healthy subjects.
A Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Vehicle-Controlled, Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solutions in Subjects with Acute Allergic Conjunctivitis