Evaluating Learning Curves and Competence in Colorectal Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Among Advanced Endoscopy Trainees

Competence Clinical Trial

— EMR-STAT  

Official title:

Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Learning Curves and Competence in Colorectal Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Among Advanced Endoscopy Trainees Using A Standardized Assessment Tool: A Quality Improvement Initiative

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06376006
• Other study ID #: 1798538
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Start date: May 11, 2022
• Est. completion date: December 1, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: April 2024
• Source: AdventHealth
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Quality improvement project with the aim to use a standardized assessment tool (EMR-STAT) to establish learning curves and competence thresholds for key cognitive and technical colorectal EMR core skills among advanced endoscopy trainees (AETs).

Description:

Baseline and Post-Training Questionnaires: The EMR-STAT Baseline Questionnaire is to better understand the participant's level of comfort with the C-EMR procedure. At the end of their training, the participant will complete the EMR-STAT Post-Training Questionnaire to evaluate their training experience.

Standardized Assessment tool (EMR-STAT) and Grading Protocol (Phase 1): The EMR-STAT is a tool designed for competence assessment. The tool will be used in a continuous fashion during the AETs training in colorectal EMR. The aim of the tool is to evaluate key concepts and core skills necessary for high-quality colorectal EMR as recently outlined by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer10. We have previously demonstrated the feasibility of this tool in a prior study9. The instrument evaluates for key cognitive and technical steps, including scope positioning, lesion assessment, submucosal lifting, endoscopic resection, adjunct resection/ablative techniques, management of adverse events, and elective defect closure. A 4-point scoring system was developed to grade each endpoint: 4 (superior), achieves task without instruction; 3 (advanced), achieves with minimal verbal cues; 2 (intermediate), achieves with multiple verbal cues or hands-on assistance; 1 (novice), unable to complete and requires trainer to take over. Setting these pre-defined anchors for specific individual cognitive and technical skills during grading ensures that the data collected are reproducible from one evaluator to the next. In addition, a 10-point overall assessment score (1-3, below average; 4-6, intermediate; 7-9, advanced; 10, superior) will be provided for each case. This grading format for endoscopic performance has been previously validated6,11,12

The trainees will be evaluated during live cases as part of the training experience. There will patient data that will be collected on the EMR_STAT but no patient identifiers will be documented. This data collection is integral to the study because these factors may play a role in the complexity of the procedure and impact trainees' EMR performance (ex. a cancerous lesion is more difficult to dissect than a non-cancerous lesion). This data will be analyzed as part of the learning curve for the trainees

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Enrollment: 42
• Est. completion date: December 1, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: April 1, 2024
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• 1. All AETs from the participating centers starting their advanced endoscopy fellowship training in the academic year of 2022 (regardless of prior experience with colorectal EMR)

• 2. Patients 18 years of age or older undergoing colonoscopy with EMR by the AET being evaluated for this study

Exclusion Criteria:

• 1. AETs in Advanced endoscopy programs that do not train AETs in colorectal EMR or AETs who do not intend to train in colorectal EMR during their fellowship will be excluded

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Assessment, Self
• Competence

Intervention

Behavioral:
• EMR STAT - Survey
Surveys are completed before and after Advanced Fellow Training.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	AdventHealth Orlando	Orlando	Florida

Sponsors (20)

Lead Sponsor

Collaborator

AdventHealth

Atrium Medical Center, Baylor University, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Columbia University, Duke University, Geisinger Clinic, Hofstra University, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Stony Brook University, Unity Health Toronto, University of Alabama at Birmingham, University of California, Irvine, University of Chicago, University of Kentucky, University of South Florida, University of Virginia, Vanderbilt University, Yale University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (9)

ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Faulx AL, Lightdale JR, Acosta RD, Agrawal D, Bruining DH, Chandrasekhara V, Eloubeidi MA, Gurudu SR, Kelsey L, Khashab MA, Kothari S, Muthusamy VR, Qumseya BJ, Shaukat A, Wang A, Wani SB, Yang J, DeWitt JM. Guidelines for privileging, credentialing, and proctoring to perform GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Feb;85(2):273-281. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.036. No abstract available. Erratum In: Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 May;85(5):1115. — View Citation

Bhurwal A, Bartel MJ, Heckman MG, Diehl NN, Raimondo M, Wallace MB, Woodward TA. Endoscopic mucosal resection: learning curve for large nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Dec;84(6):959-968.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.04.020. Epub 2016 Apr 22. — View Citation

Klein A, Bourke MJ. How to Perform High-Quality Endoscopic Mucosal Resection During Colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2017 Feb;152(3):466-471. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.029. Epub 2017 Jan 3. No abstract available. — View Citation

Rajendran A, Pannick S, Thomas-Gibson S, Oke S, Anele C, Sevdalis N, Haycock A. Systematic literature review of learning curves for colorectal polyp resection techniques in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. Colorectal Dis. 2020 Sep;22(9):1085-1100. doi: 10.1111/codi.14960. Epub 2020 Jan 30. — View Citation

Wani S, Keswani R, Hall M, Han S, Ali MA, Brauer B, Carlin L, Chak A, Collins D, Cote GA, Diehl DL, DiMaio CJ, Dries A, El-Hajj I, Ellert S, Fairley K, Faulx A, Fujii-Lau L, Gaddam S, Gan SI, Gaspar JP, Gautamy C, Gordon S, Harris C, Hyder S, Jones R, Kim S, Komanduri S, Law R, Lee L, Mounzer R, Mullady D, Muthusamy VR, Olyaee M, Pfau P, Saligram S, Piraka C, Rastogi A, Rosenkranz L, Rzouq F, Saxena A, Shah RJ, Simon VC, Small A, Sreenarasimhaiah J, Walker A, Wang AY, Watson RR, Wilson RH, Yachimski P, Yang D, Edmundowicz S, Early DS. A Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Learning Curves and Competence in Endoscopic Ultrasound and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Among Advanced Endoscopy Trainees: The Rapid Assessment of Trainee Endoscopy Skills Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Nov;15(11):1758-1767.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jun 16. — View Citation

Wani S, Keswani RN, Petersen B, Edmundowicz SA, Walsh CM, Huang C, Cohen J, Cote G. Training in EUS and ERCP: standardizing methods to assess competence. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jun;87(6):1371-1382. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Apr 27. No abstract available. — View Citation

Yang D, Othman M, Draganov PV. Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection For Barrett's Esophagus and Colorectal Neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May;17(6):1019-1028. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.09.030. Epub 2018 Sep 26. — View Citation

Yang D, Perbtani YB, Wang Y, Rumman A, Wang AY, Kumta NA, DiMaio CJ, Antony A, Trindade AJ, Rolston VS, D'Souza LS, Corral Hurtado JE, Gomez V, Pohl H, Draganov PV, Beyth RJ, Lee JH, Cheesman A, Uppal DS, Sejpal DV, Bucobo JC, Wallace MB, Ngamruengphong S, Ajayeoba O, Khara HS, Diehl DL, Jawaid S, Forsmark CE; C-EMR STAT Study Group. Evaluating learning curves and competence in colorectal EMR among advanced endoscopy fellows: a pilot multicenter prospective trial using cumulative sum analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Mar;93(3):682-690.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.09.023. Epub 2020 Sep 19. — View Citation

Yang D, Wagh MS, Draganov PV. The status of training in new technologies in advanced endoscopy: from defining competence to credentialing and privileging. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Nov;92(5):1016-1025. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.047. Epub 2020 Jun 3. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Primary Endpoint	The primary endpoint will be the establishment of minimum thresholds in colorectal EMR training, including benchmarks for pre-defined cognitive and technical core skills based on the survey responses from study participants.	12 months