View clinical trials related to Colorectal Neoplasms.
Filter by:The study is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy, and safety of SHR-A1811 in advanced colorectal cancer subjects.
The primary objectives of Part 1 of this study are to: - Assess the safety and tolerability of the combination of BGB-3245 and panitumumab in participants with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) with a known mutation status and tumor harboring an oncogenic mutation of v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B; B-RAF proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF), Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), or neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog (NRAS) with documented disease progression during or after at least 1 line of prior therapy. - Determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BGB-3245 in combination with panitumumab and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the combination. The primary objective of Part 2 of this study is to determine the objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by initial investigator review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 with BGB-3245 and panitumumab combination treatment at the RP2D.
The study aimed to develop and validate models to predict survival outcome and key mutations in patients with ovarian metastases of colorectal cancer, as well as to compare the differential gene expression between long-survival group and short-survival group.
The goal of this clinical trial is to explore the feasibility of a new mode of chemotherapy and bevacizumab induction therapy combined with immunotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with initially unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (MSS). The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. To explore the efficacy and safety of this treatment mode 2. Try to study treatment benefit the characteristics of the crowd Participants will combined with immunotherapy after chemotherapy and bevacizumab induction therapy.
The objective of this pilot study is to compare the effectiveness of mailed outreach of two stool based tests, Cologuard and the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in screening eligible adults ages 45-49 receiving care at the University of California San Diego Health system.
Microscopic colitis (MC) is an inflammatory bowel disease characterized by chronic non-bloody watery diarrhoea and a macroscopically normal colonic mucosa upon endoscopic exploration (colonoscopy). The diagnosis is performed by microscopic examination of mucosal biopsies that reveal specific histopathological change. Between 4-20% of patients with chronic non-bloody diarrhoea who undergo colonoscopy with serial biopsies are diagnosed with MC. It has long been hypothesized that the microbiome plays a key role in the pathogenesis of MC. In patients with collagenous colitis, faecal stream diversion results in inflammation and histological remission, followed by disease relapse after intestinal transit is reconstructed. Moreover, studies carried out with faecal samples obtained after colonoscopy have demonstrated microbiome changes (reduced alpha diversity and higher microbial dysbiosis index) in patients with active MC. To avoid potential bias due to the effect of colonic lavage prior to colonoscopy in microbiota composition, the researchers of the present study previously evaluated the microbiome in faecal samples obtained before the diagnostic colonoscopy in patients with active MC. The results confirmed a reduced alpha diversity in diarrhoea groups; however, there were no differences between MC, bile-acid diarrhoea and functional diarrhoea. The microbial dysbiosis index was significantly higher in MC compared to the other diarrheal groups, but no bacterial species showed a significantly different relative abundance. On the other hand, the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) or adenoma seems to be reduced in MC compared to controls. Growing evidence suggests microbial dysbiosis is a crucial environmental factor in the initiation of precancerous lesions of CRC such as adenomas. The objective of the current multicentric prospective study is to assess the differences in the mucosa adherent intestinal microbiome between patients with MC, non-MC chronic diarrhoea, healthy controls and patients with advanced colon adenomas. In addition to the study of the microbiome, sociodemographic variables, history of drug usage, diets and specific characteristics of diarrhoea will be collected. The hypothesis of the present study is that CM presents a specific mucosa adherent intestinal bacterial profile that may be relevant in the pathogenesis of the disease and that, additionally, may also play a protective role against the development of CRC and adenomas.
A Phase II Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Cadonilimab Combined With Fruquintinib and SBRT as A third-line and Posterior Line Treatment in Patients With MSS Colorectal Cancer
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate whether ctDNA methylation is a more precise indicator to guide postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in stage Ill colorectal cancer. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Whether ctDNA methylation-guided escalation strategy is superior to standard treatment for stage III high-risk CRC patients. 2. Whether ctDNA methylation-guided de-escalation strategy is non-inferior to standard treatment for stage III low-risk CRC patients. 325 cases were included in the high-risk cohort (T4 and/or N2) and 665 cases were included in the low-risk cohort (T1-T3, N1). Then patients in each cohort were randomly assigned to ctDNA-guided treatment (ctDNA-guided group) and standard treatment (standard treatment group) in a ratio of 2:1. The standard treatment group and ctDNA-negative group in the high-risk cohort were treated with XELOX regimen for 6 months, and the ctDNA-positive group in the high-risk cohort was treated with cmFOLFOXIRI regimen for 6 months. The standard treatment group and the ctDNA-positive group in the low-risk cohort were treated with XELOX regimen for 3 months, while the ctDNA-negative group in the low-risk cohort did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy.
Colonoscopy is the mainstay modality of choice in colorectal cancer screening worldwide. However, the rate of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening is very low (approximately 5-10%) because of the limited local medical resources (such as endoscopists and regional endoscope). This observational diagnostic test study aims to compare the diagnostic yield of routine computed tomography and colonoscopy in detecting colorectal tumors in patients at risk of colorectal cancer (aged more than 50 years and FIT+). The main question[s] it aims to answer are: 1. To compare the diagnostic yield between the routine computed tomography and colonoscopy. 2. To compare the procedure-related adverse events between the routine computed tomography and colonoscopy.
The scope of this research is to examine the acceptability and feasibility of a refined web-based intervention ("STOMA Care" app) by conducting a randomized pilot consisting of bladder and colorectal cancer patients scheduled for ostomy surgery at Mount Sinai Health System and their primary caregivers. This study aims to explore the impact of the app on stoma-related knowledge and beliefs, patient stoma-care skills and self-efficacy beliefs, and self-regulation and adaptation (e.g., distress and quality of life) among patients and their informal caregivers.