View clinical trials related to Colorectal Neoplasms Malignant.
Filter by:The objective of this observational study was to investigate the clinical significance of benign mesenteric lymph node （BLNE） enlargement in patients with colorectal cancer. The main questions it aims to answer are: Do patients with benign mesenteric lymph node enlargement have a better prognosis? What are the clinical characteristics of benign mesenteric lymph node enlargement? As part of routine medical care for colorectal cancer, we will follow up with all participants over the course of the study.
This study aims to develop a highly sensitive, specific, and cost-effective blood assay for early detection of colorectal adenomas and cancer, using advanced machine learning and state-of-the-art biological analyses.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) once predominantly affected older individuals, but in recent years has witnessed a progressive increase in incidence among young adults. Once rare, early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC, that is, a CRC diagnosed before the age of 50) now constitutes 10-15% of all newly diagnosed CRC cases and it stands as the first cause of cancer-related death in young men and the second for young women. This study aims to detect EOCRC with a non-invasive test, using a blood-based molecular assay based on microRNA (ribonucleic acid)
Tumor recurrence significantly affects survival rates following the local resection of submucosal colorectal cancers (T1 CRC). Despite this, there are currently no reliable biomarkers established to predict recurrence in T1 CRC. This study seeks to improve the prediction of recurrence-free survival in individuals who have survived T1 CRC.
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the effectiveness of localized interventions in improving the 5-year survival rate for colorectal cancer patients with ≥10 liver metastases. We aim to answer the following question: Can localized interventions, including surgery and/or ablation and/or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), enhance the 5-year survival rate compared to palliative chemotherapy alone in patients with ≥10 colorectal liver metastases (CRLM)? Participants in this study, who have achieved disease control through chemotherapy, will undergo either localized interventions (surgery and/or ablation and/or SBRT) or receive palliative chemotherapy alone. Researchers will compare the survival outcomes between these groups to determine the potential benefits of localized interventions for patients with ≥10 CRLM.
The SYLMET Trial is a randomized trial to compare simultaneous and two-staged resection of primary colorectal and synchronous liver metastases. This is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomized controlled trial to assess complications (primary endpoint), survival, cost-effectiveness, and quality of life (secondary endpoints).This trial will include patients with resectable primary tumour in the colon or upper rectum with less than five liver metastases that is possible to treat with surgical resection and/or ablation (RFA/MWA) at time of evaluation.
Robotic right hemicolectomy with intra-corporeal anastomosis may have better short-term recovery outcomes and decreased incidence of incisional hernia when compared to the laparoscopic actual standard of care, for similar safety outcomes.
The study attempts to quantify the relative risks for mortality, anastomotic leakage and other early and late postoperative complications, recurrence rate, cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free survival after colorectal surgery for patients with colorectal cancer depending on the localization of the tumor.
Exploring the effect of protective ileostomy compared with transverse colostomy on the occurrence of complications, the occurrence of serious side effects of adjuvant chemotherapy and disease recurrence in patients with low rectal cancer after radical surgery from the perspective of intestinal microecology.
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is used for preoperative risk assessment in patients with colorectal cancer who need to undergo surgery. For presentation and interpretation purposes, CPET data are averaged by using a time- or breath-based average. It is uncertain to what extent differences in data averaging methods influence the numerical value of preoperative CPET-derived variables used for risk assessment. Therefore, the primary aim of this study is to investigate the influence of different CPET data averaging intervals on the numerical values of CPET-derived variables used for preoperative risk assessment in patients scheduled for elective colorectal cancer surgery. The secondary aim is to elucidate the impact of data-averaging intervals on classification of patients into a low- or high-risk category for postoperative complications based on known risk assessment thresholds.