Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05999162 |
Other study ID # |
202306117RINA |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
August 4, 2023 |
Est. completion date |
August 13, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
August 2023 |
Source |
National Taiwan University Hospital |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The present study was to investigate if the incidence, patterns and surgical outcomes of
mechanical ileus have changed in the era of minimally invasive surgery (MIS).
Description:
Mechanical ileus, generally caused by post-operative bowel adhesion, represented 12-16% of
emergency surgical admissions and 20% of emergency surgical procedures. Opening the
peritoneal cavity, in whatever type of surgery, leads to the formation of potentially
obstructive structures (adhesions or bands) in almost 95% of patients. The adhesion resulted
from the irritation of the peritoneum caused by surgical trauma or intra-abdominal infection.
Bowel adhesions can lead to clinical manifestations within a few weeks or even several years
after the surgery. It has been reported that traditional open surgery (TOS) for colorectal
cancer were associated with a particularly higher risk of adhesion formation and related
complications. Within two years after colorectal surgery, 14.3% of the patients will suffer
from small bowel obstruction, and 2.6% will require a surgical intervention for the treatment
of this obstruction, and this incidence is even higher after rectal surgery. Adhesive ileus
has been a clinical conundrum. Overall, nearly one-fifth of patients needed re-admission for
a recurrent disease, even they had been successfully treated by surgical, or non-surgical
methods during the index admission.
During the last decade, minimally invasive surgery (MIS), either via laparoscopic or robotic
approach, has become the standard procedures for the treatment of colorectal cancer.
Theoretically, MIS is associated with a much lower rate of postoperative formation of
adhesions than TOB, since adhesion formation represents a stepwise failure of peritoneal
tissue repair mechanisms, which can be prevented by the clean dissection, minimal blood loss
and/or less-environmental exposure of the bowel inherent in MIS. Some researchers supported
this concept by showing MIS colorectal surgery is associated with fewer adhesion-related
admissions than open surgery. However, most reported case series were retrospective
uncontrolled studies and were liable to some uncertainty; even in some rare randomized
controlled trials, the conclusions were contradictory. Moreover, adhesive ileus is just one
variant of mechanical ileus; some researchers have pointed out the MIS can paradoxically
create some specific types of mechanical ileus, such as internal or external herniation of
small intestine, or bowel twisting over the anastomotic site, and so on. Therefore, it
remains unclear whether MIS colorectal resection can reduce the incidence of the mechanical
ileus and improve the long-term bowel function, as compared with the TOS.
Considering the aforementioned reasons, we conducted the present study to investigate if the
incidence, patterns and the treatment outcomes of post-operative mechanical ileus changed in
the era of MIS for colorectal cancer.