Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05115916 |
Other study ID # |
FITPrimer |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
August 28, 2019 |
Est. completion date |
December 20, 2020 |
Study information
Verified date |
November 2021 |
Source |
University of California, Los Angeles |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Behavioral economics principles have increasingly been shown to improve health outcomes in
the United States. They offer the ability to implement simple, low-cost and effective
interventions to address key health issues without sacrificing the autonomy of patients.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is a key area where behavioral economics principles can
help improve health outcomes. Despite being the second leading cause of cancer related death,
the rate of CRC screening remains well below national targets. Interventions to address these
issues, and improve screening rates at our institution have including implementing a Mailed
FIT outreach program, and adding an informational letter that utilizes behavioral economic
principles. To further improve our screening rates, this project builds upon our previous
efforts to include a randomized electronic message primer via patients electronic patient
portal, to help alert them of incoming FIT Kit and complete screening. This study will
contribute to the growing literature of behavioral economics in medicine, while addressing an
important health issue.
Description:
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of death from cancers affecting both men
and women in the United States. One in 17 Americans will suffer from CRC during his/her
lifetime. Early detection by screening has been shown to reduce CRC mortality. Despite
screening recommendations, the U.S. screening rate remains well below the national benchmark
of 80% as established by the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. The U.S. Multi-Society
Task Force (MSTF), however, does recommended FIT and colonoscopy as first line screening
modalities for CRC in 2017. To help address the issue of suboptimal CRC screening, the
investigators implemented an intervention utilizing the principles of behavioral economics to
improve screening rates. Studies in behavioral economics and psychology indicate that how
information or choice is framed impacts behavior in predictable ways, which has applications
in health and medicine, including the design of CRC screening strategies. This project builds
upon our institutions continued quality improvement efforts utilizing behavioral economics
principles to improve CRC screening, through improving the choice architecture, framing and
salience of information to incentivize routine screening.
For this project the investigators will leverage our electronic health records (EHR) patient
portals to improve CRC screening. Specifically, the investigators developed an electronic
primer within the EHR patient portal to alert patients due for CRC screening before arrival
of a mailed FIT Kit. The investigators randomized implementation of the primer at the
patient-level to determine whether the electronic primer improved CRC screening completion in
patients enrolled in our mailed FIT program.
For our analysis, after summarizing our demographic data, the investigators plan to compare
screening completion in the two study arms using an intention-to-treat analysis and t-tests.
The investigators then plan a logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards model to
compare time to screening utilization in the two study arms, controlling for age, sex, race,
and ethnicity. Following this the investigators use Fisher's exact tests to compare
completion of individual screening modalities in the two study arms. Lastly, the
investigators plan a secondary, analysis to determine the impact of opening the portal
message on screening utilization, using randomization arm as an instrumental variable. In
this analysis the investigators compare the subset of patients in the intervention group that
opened the portal primer message to the control group. P-values less than 0.05 are considered
statistically significant.