Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trial
Official title:
Phase II Study of the Combination of Bevacizumab (rhuMab VEGF) and Oxaliplatin Plus Capecitabine (XELOX) in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer
| Verified date | July 2014 |
| Source | Hoffmann-La Roche |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | Italy: Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) |
| Study type | Interventional |
This study will assess the efficacy and safety of treatment with the combination Avastin (bevacizumab) 5mg/kg iv every 2 weeks, Xeloda (capecitabine) 1000 mg po b.i.d. on Days 1-14 of every 28-day cycle and oxaliplatin 40mg/m2 iv weekly in patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 50 |
| Est. completion date | July 2010 |
| Est. primary completion date | July 2010 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | Both |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Adult patients >=18 years of age - Locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer - No previous treatment with chemotherapy for metastatic disease - Measurable and/or evaluable lesions Exclusion Criteria: - Radiotherapy within 4 weeks before study - Untreated brain metastases or primary brain tumors - Chronic, daily treatment with high-dose aspirin (>325mg/day) - Co-existing malignancies, or malignancies diagnosed within the last 5 years, with the exception of basal and squamous cell cancer, or cervical cancer in situ |
Allocation: Non-Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | |||
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Hoffmann-La Roche |
Italy,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) | Percentage of participants with OR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. PR was defined as greater than or equal to (=)30 percent (%) decrease under baseline of the sum of the longest diameter (LD) diameters of all target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions. Complete and partial responses must have been confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. | Baseline, every 3 months to progression of disease or end of study (up to 24 months) | No |
| Primary | Percentage of Participants by Best Overall Response | Best response recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression. Based on assessment of CR, PR, stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD), according to RECIST. CR: disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. PR: =30% decrease under baseline of the sum of the LD diameters of all target lesions. CR and PR persist on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. Reference is the smallest sum LD. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded or the appearance of one or more new lesions. | Baseline, every 3 months to progression of disease or end of study (up to 24 months) | No |
| Secondary | Duration of Response - Percentage of Participants With an Event by 24 Months | Duration of overall response (CR or PR) was calculated only for participants of the ITT population whose best overall response was CR or PR based on RECIST criteria. Duration of overall response was defined as the time from the date of the first assessment of CR or PR status until the date of progression or death. Data for participants who were alive without any objectively documented disease progression at the end of the study were censored as of the date of last contact. | Baseline, every 3 months to progression of disease or end of study (up to 24 months) | No |
| Secondary | Duration of Response | Duration of overall response (CR or PR) was calculated for participants of the ITT population whose best overall response was CR or PR based on RECIST criteria. Duration of overall response was defined as the time from the date of the first assessment of CR or PR status until the date of progression or death. Data for participants who were alive without any objectively documented disease progression at the end of the study were censored as of the date of last contact. Mean time to event was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. | Baseline, every 3 months to progression of disease or end of study (up to 24 months) | No |
| Secondary | Duration of Stable Disease - Percentage of Participants With an Event by 24 Months | Duration of stable response (CR, PR, or stable disease [SD]) was calculated only for participants of the ITT population whose best overall response was CR, PR, or SD based on RECIST criteria. Duration of overall response was defined as the time from the date of the first assessment of CR, PR, or SD status until the date of progression or death. Data for participants who were alive without any objectively documented disease progression at the end of the study were censored as of the date of last contact. | Baseline, every 3 months to progression of disease or end of study (up to 24 months) | No |
| Secondary | Duration of Stable Disease | Duration of stable response (CR, PR, or SD) was calculated only for participants of the ITT population whose best overall response was CR, PR, or SD based on RECIST criteria. Duration of overall response was defined as the time from the date of the first assessment of CR, PR, or SD status until the date of progression or death. Data for participants who were alive without any objectively documented disease progression at the end of the study were censored as of the date of last contact. Mean time to event was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. | Baseline, every 3 months to progression of disease or end of study (up to 24 months) | No |
| Secondary | Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) - Percentage of Participants With an Event by 24 Months | TTF was defined as the time in months from Day 1 until discontinuation of treatment for any reasons. These reasons included: death due to any cause, treatment toxicity (adverse event), insufficient therapeutic response (progression of disease), failure to return (lost to follow-up), refusing treatment (participant non-compliance), being unwilling to cooperate and withdrawing consent (participant withdrew consent). | Baseline, every month to end of treatment (up to 24 months) | No |
| Secondary | Time to Treatment Failure | TTF was defined as the time in months from Day 1 until discontinuation of treatment for any reasons. These reasons included: death due to any cause, treatment toxicity (adverse event), insufficient therapeutic response (progression of disease), failure to return (lost to follow-up), refusing treatment (participant non-compliance), being unwilling to cooperate and withdrawing consent (participant withdrew consent). Mean TTF was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. | Baseline, monthly to end of study (up to 24 months) | No |
| Secondary | Time to Progression (TTP) - Percentage of Participants With an Event by 24 Months | TTP was defined as the time time in months from Day 1 until the date of first documented progressive disease, or death due to any cause. Data for participants who were alive without disease progression at the end of study, or who were non-responder participants (without tumor assessment after baseline) were censored at Day 1. | Baseline, monthly to end of study (up to 24 months) | No |
| Secondary | Time to Progression | TTP was defined as the time in months from Day 1 until the date of first documented progressive disease, or death due to any cause. Data for participants who were alive without disease progression at the end of study, or who were non-responder participants (without tumor assessment after baseline) were censored at Day 1. Mean TTP was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. | Baseline, monthly to end of study (up to 24 months) | No |
| Secondary | Overall Survival (OS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event by 24 Months | OS was defined as the time in months from Day 1 until the date of death due to any cause. Data for participants who were alive at the end of the study were censored at the date of the last available follow-up visit. | Baseline, monthly to end of study (up to 24 months) | No |
| Secondary | Overall Survival | OS was defined as the time in months from Day 1 until the date of death due to any cause. Data for participants who were alive at the end of the study were censored at the date of the last available follow-up visit. Mean OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. | Baseline, monthly to end of study (up to 24 months) | No |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting |
NCT05400122 -
Natural Killer (NK) Cells in Combination With Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGFbeta) Receptor I Inhibitor Vactosertib in Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT05551052 -
CRC Detection Reliable Assessment With Blood
|
||
| Completed |
NCT00098787 -
Bevacizumab and Oxaliplatin Combined With Irinotecan or Leucovorin and Fluorouracil in Treating Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Colorectal Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06037954 -
A Study of Mental Health Care in People With Cancer
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05425940 -
Study of XL092 + Atezolizumab vs Regorafenib in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
|
Phase 3 | |
| Suspended |
NCT04595604 -
Long Term Effect of Trimodal Prehabilitation Compared to ERAS in Colorectal Cancer Surgery.
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03414125 -
Effect of Mailed Invites of Choice of Colonoscopy or FIT vs. Mailed FIT Alone on Colorectal Cancer Screening
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02963831 -
A Study to Investigate ONCOS-102 in Combination With Durvalumab in Subjects With Advanced Peritoneal Malignancies
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05489211 -
Study of Dato-Dxd as Monotherapy and in Combination With Anti-cancer Agents in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours (TROPION-PanTumor03)
|
Phase 2 | |
| Terminated |
NCT01847599 -
Educational Intervention to Adherence of Patients Treated by Capecitabine +/- Lapatinib
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05799976 -
Text Message-Based Nudges Prior to Primary Care Visits to Increase Care Gap Closure
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03874026 -
Study of Folfiri/Cetuximab in FcGammaRIIIa V/V Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Patients
|
Phase 2 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT03170960 -
Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Completed |
NCT03167125 -
Participatory Research to Advance Colon Cancer Prevention
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03181334 -
The C-SPAN Coalition: Colorectal Cancer Screening and Patient Navigation
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04258137 -
Circulating DNA to Improve Outcome of Oncology PatiEnt. A Randomized Study
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05568420 -
A Study of the Possible Effects of Medication on Young Onset Colorectal Cancer (YOCRC)
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT02972541 -
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Verse Surgery Alone After Stent Placement for Obstructive Colonic Cancer
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02876224 -
Study of Cobimetinib in Combination With Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab in Participants With Gastrointestinal and Other Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
| Completed |
NCT01943500 -
Collection of Blood Specimens for Circulating Tumor Cell Analysis
|
N/A |