View clinical trials related to Colorectal Cancer Metastatic.
Filter by:In this study the characteristics and alterations of the gut microbiome during chemotherapy for metastasized or irresectable CRC are studied, as well as the relation between the gut microbiome and the effects of chemotherapy.
This study is a retrospective observational study that evaluates the rate of cardiovascular adverse events leading to hospitalization in metastatic colorectal cancer in the French county Calvados by drug exposure.
Phase II randomized trial to investigate whether supplementation of zinc decreases the incidence of HFSR that occurs after treatment of tyrosine kinase inhibitor, regorafenib.
The COLT trial is an investigator-driven, multicenter, non-randomized, open-label, controlled, prospective, parallel trial, aimed at assessing the efficacy (in terms of overall survival: OS) of liver transplantation (LT) in liver-only CRC metastases, compared with a matched cohort of patients bearing the same tumor characteristics, collected during the same time period and included in a phase III Italian RCT on triplet chemotherapy+antiEGFR
This phase II trial studies how well nivolumab and metformin work in treating patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) stage IV colorectal cancer that has not responded to previous treatment. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as nivolumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Metformin is an antidiabetic drug that and may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer development in patients. Giving nivolumab and metformin may work better in treating patients with refractory microsatellite metastatic colorectal cancer.
XELOX as first-line treatment regimen has limited efficacy against patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Peritoneal metastasis is one of the most lethal factor for mCRC. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has became a widely accepted strategy in the treatment of peritoneal dissemination. We hypothesized that combined multi-channel administration, such as intraperitoneal chemotherapy, oral chemotherapy, and intravenous chemotherapy, can produce better results than XELOX for first-line treatment for mCRC patients.
This study is being conducted to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of EDP1503 alone and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced metastatic colorectal carcinoma, triple-negative breast cancer, and checkpoint inhibitor relapsed tumors
To estimate progression-free-survival at 6 months in subjects treated in first-line with panitumumab and FOLFOX and with wild type RAS mCRC (metastatic colorectal cancer) confirmed in liquid biopsies before starting second line treatment will be screened for this trial and who have interrupted panitumumab for <3 months (panitumumab continuation). Control arm of subjects treated with FOLFIRI alone will be included. The combinations of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)are considered the backbone chemotherapy for mCRC. Clinical trials have shown the benefit of adding monoclonal antibodies to subjects without mutations in RAS, directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (cetuximab and panitumumab) to conventional chemotherapy as first-line treatment of mCRC. This trial purposes to study the treatment beyond progression with panitumumab in subjects treated in first-line with an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, or rather,the re-introduction of the same targeted therapy after progression to first line. The clinical hypothesis of this study is that the second-line regimen FOLFIRI + panitumumab, is sufficiently active (defined as a 6-months PFS higher than 30% [based on prior results with second-line FOLFIRI alone] and of at least 50%), justifying further study in this population.
The present study will investigate the feasibility and clinical value of using circulating tumor DNA as selection for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Cytoreduction surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intra-operative peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a relatively new treatment for selected patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin (PMCR). Data from outside of trials suggest that CRS and HIPEC improves survival compared with the current standard care (chemotherapy). The big challenge is to do trials in this setting - as the intervention is complex, and there are wide variations in the process and recording of outcomes. If trials can confirm the findings from non-randomised studies there are an estimated 1000 to 2000 patients who may benefit from this intervention in the UK each year. The aim of this study is to develop a framework which can be used to undertake a randomised trial in patients with PMCR suitable for CRS with or without HIPEC. The investigators will address this using the principles of the IDEAL (Idea, Development, Evaluation, Assessment & Long term study) framework. Here, a pre-trial feasibility study will be performed between the two national peritoneal tumour treatment centres (Manchester and Basingstoke). This study is designed as such that it will take place over the following four stages: Stage 1. Comparing the treatment data from 100 operations from each of the two centres to identify which of the key components of the intervention differ as well as testing for differences in overall survival and recurrence free survival. Stage 2. Identifying sources of these differences by selecting up to 25 patients and investigating the variation in the way surgeons score key aspects of the procedure Stage 3. Development of a 'trial manual' with standardised definitions (to minimise any differences) Stage 4. Test how well people follow the manual in practice. After this study is complete, it will be possible to use the resulting trial manual to design future randomised trials to test the most suitable clinical question.