Colonoscopy Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Effect of Gum Chewing and Abdominal Vibration on the Quality and Satisfaction of the Patient's Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy
Colorectal cancers are a significant global health issue, underscoring the critical importance of screening programs for early detection and effective treatment. The success of a colonoscopy is largely contingent on the quality of bowel preparation. Inadequate bowel preparation can diminish the effectiveness of a colonoscopy and lead to the oversight of lesions. Previous research has demonstrated the positive effects of diet, education, and polyethylene glycol use on bowel preparation. However, there is limited research on the impact of methods such as gum chewing and abdominal vibration. This study aims to assess the effects of gum chewing and abdominal vibration, in addition to diet and medication, on the quality of bowel preparation and patient satisfaction in the pre-colonoscopy bowel preparation process. The study employs a randomized controlled single-blind experimental design with three distinct groups: a control group, a gum chewing group, and an abdominal vibration group. Each group will be evaluated based on bowel preparation quality and patient satisfaction. Bowel preparation quality will be determined using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, and factors such as polyp detection, the processability of the colonoscopy, and cecal intubation time will also be assessed. Patient satisfaction levels will be evaluated by considering how satisfied patients are with the colonoscopy process, taking into account complaints before and after the procedure. The outcomes of this study will contribute to a better understanding of the impact of gum chewing and abdominal vibration on the quality of bowel preparation and patient satisfaction before colonoscopy. Identifying effective methods to enhance bowel preparation quality can elevate the standard of nursing care, contributing to a healthier society. Simultaneously, this research can improve the comfort and efficacy of the colonoscopy process for patients and enhance the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening programs, thereby benefiting public health.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 145 |
Est. completion date | December 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | February 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Individuals aged between 18 and 65 years, - Capable of effective communication, - Mentally healthy, - Individuals who can comprehend and implement planned interventions before colonoscopy. Exclusion Criteria: - Individuals with a history of abdominal surgery, - Those with serious illnesses that could affect the study outcomes (e.g., severe heart failure, kidney failure), - Individuals using medications that could impact intestinal functions due to systemic diseases, - Individuals who have not complied with the recommended interventions will not be included. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Turkey | Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa | Istanbul |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC) |
Turkey,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Boston Bowel Preparation Classification (BBHS) | This comparison will involve the assessment of bowel preparation quality for all groups, including the control group, using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). BBPS developed in 2009, is used to assess the quality of bowel preparation. When BBPS is employed, each segment of the colon (left, transverse, and right) is scored based on the cleanliness degree. Each segment is scored between 0 and 3. The highest score in BBPS is 9, indicating that all segments of the colon are completely clean, while 0 points suggest inadequate cleanliness. | 2 days | |
Secondary | Patient satisfaction survey | The aim is to evaluate the effects of chewing gum and vibration application on patients' satisfaction levels. This assessment will take into account how satisfied patients are with the colonoscopy process and the complaints they experience before and after the procedure. | 2 days |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04101097 -
Training and Validation of Models of Factors to Predict Inadequate Bowel Preparation Colonoscopy
|
||
Completed |
NCT03247595 -
Testing How Well Magnesium Citrate Capsules Work as Preparation for a Colonoscopy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04214301 -
An Open-Label Preference Evaluation of BLI800
|
Phase 4 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05754255 -
Comparison of High-flow Oxygen With or Without Nasal Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) During Propofol Sedation for Colonoscopy in an Ambulatory Surgical Center
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02484105 -
Comforting Conversation During Colonoscopy: A Trial on Patient Satisfaction
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02264249 -
Residual Gastric Volume in Same Day Versus Split Dose and Evening Before Bowel Preparation
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01978509 -
The Affect of Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Hospitalized Patients Colonoscopies
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01964417 -
The Comparative Study Between Bowel Preparation Method
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01685970 -
Comparison of Same-day 2 Sachets Picosulfate Versus High Volume PEG for Afternoon Colonoscopy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01518790 -
Short Course, Single-dose PEG 3350 for Colonoscopy Prep in Children
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT00748293 -
Achievement of Better Examinee Compliance on Colon Cleansing Using Commercialized Low-Residue Diet
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00779649 -
MoviPrep® Versus HalfLytely®, Low-VolUme PEG Solutions for Colon Cleansing: An InvesTigator-blindEd, Randomized, Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00671177 -
Clinical Evaluation of Water Immersion Colonoscopy Insertion Technique
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00380497 -
Pico-Salax Versus Poly-Ethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleanout Before Colonoscopy in Children
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00160823 -
Impact of a Self-Administered Information Leaflet on Adequacy of Colonic Cleansing for in-Hospital Patients
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00390598 -
PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 4L Versus Senna Glycoside (Pursennid® Ex-Lax) 36mg and PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 2L for Large Bowel Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopy
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00314418 -
Patient Position and Impact on Colonoscopy Time
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00209573 -
A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection Versus Midazolam HCl for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Elective Colonoscopy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00427089 -
Comparison of 2L NRL994 With NaP Preparation in Colon Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopies for Colon Tumor Screening
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05823350 -
The Effect of Abdominal Massage on Pain and Distention After Colonoscopy
|
N/A |