Colonoscopy Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of High-flow Oxygen With or Without Nasal Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) During Propofol Sedation for Colonoscopy in an Ambulatory Surgical Center: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT number | NCT05754255 |
Other study ID # | 17675 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Withdrawn |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | September 2023 |
Est. completion date | June 3, 2024 |
Verified date | January 2024 |
Source | Indiana University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The primary objective of the prospective study is to compare the incidence, duration, and severity of oxygen desaturation in high-risk patients randomized to nasal mask with nasal positive airway pressure (PAP) or standard care (nasal cannula) receiving propofol sedation during colonoscopy in an ambulatory surgical center (ASC). Patients will be randomized in groups of ten to one of two groups using a random number table. Group A: standard care with a nasal cannula. Group B: SuperNO2VA™EtCO2. Following the procedure subjects will be asked to complete satisfaction surveys before leaving the ASC and 48 +/- hours following their procedure. Researchers will compare levels of satisfaction and levels of oxygen saturation.
Status | Withdrawn |
Enrollment | 0 |
Est. completion date | June 3, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | June 1, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age =18 years 2. Outpatients undergoing colonoscopy. 3. American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Physical Status I-III 4. BMI =35 kg/m2, documented obstructive sleep apnea or BMI>30 with STOP-BANG score =3 5. Written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: 1. Inpatient status 2. Active Congestive Heart Failure Exacerbation 3. Untreated ischemic heart disease 4. Acute exacerbation of respiratory disorders, including COPD and asthma 5. Emergent procedures 6. Pregnancy 7. Previous enrollment in this study 8. Inability to provide informed consent. 9. Additional medical testing planned for the same day. 10. History of allergic reaction to propofol 11. History of allergic reaction to polypropylene or PVC. 12. Tracheostomy 13. Supra-glottic or sub-glottic tumor 14. Gastrointestinal tract obstruction or delayed transit (including delayed gastric emptying, gastric bezoar, achalasia, toxic megacolon). 15. Known obstructing colon tumor, lesion, or stricture 16. Previous colon surgery (excluding anal surgery) 17. Active GI bleeding (hematochezia or melena during procedure preparation) 18. Large polyp (> 2cm) removal 19. Previous failed or unsuccessfully completed colonoscopy. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Indiana University | Indianapolis | Indiana |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Indiana University |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Incidence of desaturation | Compare incidence of desaturation of Nasal PAP Versus Nasal Administration of Oxygen | 60 minutes | |
Primary | Duration of oxygen desaturation | Compare the duration of desaturation of Nasal PAP Versus Nasal Administration of Oxygen | 60 minutes | |
Primary | Severity of oxygen desaturation | Compare the severity of desaturation of Nasal PAP Versus Nasal Administration of Oxygen | 60 minutes | |
Secondary | Total Amount of Propofol for Adequate Sedation | Compares amounts of Propofol for induction and entire procedure administered for procedure | 60 minutes | |
Secondary | Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale | Compare Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (MOAAS) scores immediately prior to endoscope insertion and during the procedure.
MOAAS scale is 0-5, where 0=No response after painful stimuli and 5 Responds to name spoken in normal tone. Patients with a MOAAS <4 are considered to be moderately to deeply sedated. The greater the degree of sedation the greater the degree of respiratory depression. |
60 minutes | |
Secondary | Endoscope Insertion | Compare the length of time from induction to endoscope insertion. | 60 minutes | |
Secondary | Incidence of Airway maneuvers | Compare the number of incidence of airway maneuvers | 60 minutes | |
Secondary | Duration of Airway maneuvers | Compare the duration for airway maneuvers | 60 minutes | |
Secondary | Patient Satisfaction | Compare patient satisfaction scores (visual analog scale (VAS)) immediately after procedure.
VAS range is from 0= Not at all satisfied to 5=Completely satisfied. |
48 hours | |
Secondary | Reason(s) for airway maneuvers | Compare reason(s) for airway maneuvers as reported by anesthesiologist via open ended interview in real time. | 60 minutes | |
Secondary | Incidence of any desaturation | Compare the incidence of any oxygen desaturation <85% between the start and end of sedation. | 60 Minutes | |
Secondary | Frequency of Oxygen Saturation | Compare the frequency of oxygen saturation saturation <85% over 15 seconds between the start and end of sedation. | 60 minutes | |
Secondary | Frequency of bradycardia | Compare the frequency of bradycardia (HR<45 bpm)between the start and end of sedation. | 60 minutes | |
Secondary | Frequency of low respiratory rate | Compare the frequency of low respiratory rate (<6 per minute between the start and end of sedation. | 60 minutes | |
Secondary | Use of endotracheal intubation | Compare the use of endotracheal intubation as airway management in patient population. | 60 minutes | |
Secondary | Use of Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation | Compare the use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation as airway management in patient population during sedation. | 60 minutes. | |
Secondary | Use of pharmacological blood pressure support | Compare the use of pharmacological blood pressure support from the start and end of sedation. | 60 minutes. | |
Secondary | Incidence of hospitilization | Compare the incidence of hospitalization following sedation for a colonoscopy in patient population. | 48 hours | |
Secondary | Serious Adverse Events | Compare incidence of adverse events from start of sedation to 48 hours following the end of sedation. | 48 hours | |
Secondary | Frequency of Procedural Interruption | Compare the frequency of the removal of endoscope due to a respiratory complication from start to end of sedation. | 60 minutes | |
Secondary | Duration of Procedural Interruption | Compare the duration of endoscope removal due to a respiratory complication from start of sedation to end of sedation. | 60 minutes. | |
Secondary | Length of Procedure | Compare the length of time for procedure from start of sedation to end of sedation. | 60 minutes | |
Secondary | Ready to discharge | Compare the length of time from end of sedation to ready to discharge | 30 min | |
Secondary | Time to discharge | Compare the length of time from end of sedation to actual discharge. | 90 minutes |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04101097 -
Training and Validation of Models of Factors to Predict Inadequate Bowel Preparation Colonoscopy
|
||
Completed |
NCT03247595 -
Testing How Well Magnesium Citrate Capsules Work as Preparation for a Colonoscopy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04214301 -
An Open-Label Preference Evaluation of BLI800
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02484105 -
Comforting Conversation During Colonoscopy: A Trial on Patient Satisfaction
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02264249 -
Residual Gastric Volume in Same Day Versus Split Dose and Evening Before Bowel Preparation
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01978509 -
The Affect of Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Hospitalized Patients Colonoscopies
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01964417 -
The Comparative Study Between Bowel Preparation Method
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01685970 -
Comparison of Same-day 2 Sachets Picosulfate Versus High Volume PEG for Afternoon Colonoscopy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01518790 -
Short Course, Single-dose PEG 3350 for Colonoscopy Prep in Children
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT00748293 -
Achievement of Better Examinee Compliance on Colon Cleansing Using Commercialized Low-Residue Diet
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00779649 -
MoviPrep® Versus HalfLytely®, Low-VolUme PEG Solutions for Colon Cleansing: An InvesTigator-blindEd, Randomized, Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00671177 -
Clinical Evaluation of Water Immersion Colonoscopy Insertion Technique
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00380497 -
Pico-Salax Versus Poly-Ethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleanout Before Colonoscopy in Children
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00160823 -
Impact of a Self-Administered Information Leaflet on Adequacy of Colonic Cleansing for in-Hospital Patients
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00314418 -
Patient Position and Impact on Colonoscopy Time
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00390598 -
PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 4L Versus Senna Glycoside (Pursennid® Ex-Lax) 36mg and PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 2L for Large Bowel Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopy
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00427089 -
Comparison of 2L NRL994 With NaP Preparation in Colon Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopies for Colon Tumor Screening
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00209573 -
A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection Versus Midazolam HCl for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Elective Colonoscopy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05823350 -
The Effect of Abdominal Massage on Pain and Distention After Colonoscopy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05397158 -
Optimization of Intestinal Preparation in Older Patients
|
N/A |