Colonoscopy Clinical Trial
Official title:
Patient and Endoscopists' Experiences and Perceptions of Colonoscopy and New Technologies in Colonoscopy
Bowel cancer is the 3rd most common cancer in males and females. Most bowel cancers develop from precancerous polyps in the bowel. Colonoscopy can detect and remove these polyps, thereby reducing the risk of developing bowel cancer. However, colonoscopy is an invasive procedure with inherent risk, and can be both uncomfortable and embarrassing to undergo. The risks and numerous other barriers often mean colonoscopy, and cancer preventing polyp removal, is not performed. The investigators aim to start the first in-human feasibility clinical investigation of a robotic magnetic colonoscope in 2021. The new device aims to reduce the discomfort and risk associated with colonoscopy. As part of the patient and end user involvement aspect of the project the investigators aim to perform a mixed methodology inductive type research project exploring experiences of colonoscopy for patient and endoscopists. The study will follow an exploratory mixed methodology format with two parallel work-streams for patients and endoscopists. Each work-stream will consisting of a focus groups (1-2 for each patients and endoscopists), followed by 20 endoscopist and 30 patient in-depth interviews, then an online questionnaire. Each stage will be thematically analysed to form the semi-structured questions for the next stage. The target population will be endoscopists who perform colonoscopy and people who have undergone, or refused to undergo, a colonoscopy. Focus groups will be performed in groups of 6-10 participants, and both interview and focus groups will be performed via video/teleconferencing.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 100 |
Est. completion date | December 31, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | December 31, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: One of: - undergone a colonoscopy - offered a colonoscopy but declined - perform or training to perform colonoscopy Exclusion Criteria: - Non-English speaking - Unable to comply with any study requirements - New or ongoing diagnosis of bowel cancer |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United Kingdom | Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust | Leeds | Yorkshire |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust | Cancer Research UK |
United Kingdom,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Patient participant reported experience of colonoscopy - focus group | Descriptive reporting on thematic analysis of a focus group involving patients exploring their experience of colonoscopy. | 1 year | |
Primary | Patient participant reported experience of colonoscopy - interviews | Descriptive reporting on thematic analysis following interviews of patients exploring their experience of colonoscopy. | 1 year | |
Primary | Patient participant reported barriers to colonoscopy - focus group | Descriptive reporting on thematic analysis following a focus groups involving patients exploring the barriers to colonoscopy. | 1 year | |
Primary | Patient participant reported barriers to colonoscopy - interviews | Descriptive reporting on thematic analysis following interviews of patients exploring the barriers to colonoscopy. | 1 year | |
Primary | Colonoscopist participant perceptions of the patient experience of colonoscopy - focus group | Descriptive reporting on thematic analysis of a focus groups involving colonoscopists exploring what they feel to be important patient experience measures in colonoscopy. | 1 year | |
Primary | Colonoscopist participant perceptions of the patient experience of colonoscopy - interviews | Descriptive reporting on thematic analysis of interviews of colonoscopists exploring what they feel to be important patient experience measures in colonoscopy. | 1 year | |
Primary | Colonoscopist participant perceptions of the patient barriers to colonoscopy - focus group | Descriptive reporting on thematic analysis of a focus group involving colonoscopists exploring what they feel to be important barriers to colonoscopy for patients. | 1 year | |
Primary | Colonoscopist participant perceptions of the patient barriers to colonoscopy - interviews | Descriptive reporting on thematic analysis of interviews of colonoscopists exploring what they feel to be important barriers to colonoscopy for patients. | 1 year | |
Primary | PREMs patient participant questionnaire | Level of importance given to the reported patient experience measures and barriers (as developed from the interviews and focus groups), assessed by Likert style questions. | 1 year | |
Primary | PREMs colonoscopist participant questionnaire | Perceived level of importance given to the reported patient experience measures and barriers (as developed from the interviews and focus groups), assessed by Likert style questions. | 1 year | |
Secondary | Patient participants thoughts and feelings about robotic colonoscopy - focus group | Descriptive reporting following thematic analysis of a focus group exploring patients' thoughts and feeling on a new colonoscopy technology - a magnetic robotic colonoscope. | 1 year | |
Secondary | Patient participants thoughts and feelings about robotic colonoscopy - interview | Descriptive reporting following thematic analysis of interviews exploring patients' thoughts and feeling on a new colonoscopy technology - a magnetic robotic colonoscope. | 1 year | |
Secondary | Patient participants thoughts and feelings about artificial intelligence - focus group | Descriptive reporting following thematic analysis of a focus group exploring patients' thoughts and feeling on a artificial intelligence in endoscopy | 1 year | |
Secondary | Patient participants thoughts and feelings about artificial intelligence - interviews | Descriptive reporting following thematic analysis of interviews exploring patients' thoughts and feeling on a artificial intelligence in endoscopy | 1 year | |
Secondary | Colonoscopist participants thoughts and feelings about robotic colonoscopy - focus group | Descriptive reporting following thematic analysis of a focus group exploring colonoscopists' thoughts and feeling on a new colonoscopy technology - a magnetic robotic colonoscope. | 1 year | |
Secondary | Colonoscopist participants thoughts and feelings about robotic colonoscopy - interviews | Descriptive reporting following thematic analysis of interviews exploring colonoscopists' thoughts and feeling on a new colonoscopy technology - a magnetic robotic colonoscope. | 1 year | |
Secondary | Colonoscopist participants thoughts and feelings about artificial intelligence - focus groups | Descriptive reporting following thematic analysis of a focus group exploring colonoscopists' thoughts and feeling on a artificial intelligence in endoscopy. | 1 year | |
Secondary | Colonoscopist participants thoughts and feelings about artificial intelligence - interviews | Descriptive reporting following thematic analysis of interviews exploring colonoscopists' thoughts and feeling on a artificial intelligence in endoscopy. | 1 year |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04101097 -
Training and Validation of Models of Factors to Predict Inadequate Bowel Preparation Colonoscopy
|
||
Completed |
NCT03247595 -
Testing How Well Magnesium Citrate Capsules Work as Preparation for a Colonoscopy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04214301 -
An Open-Label Preference Evaluation of BLI800
|
Phase 4 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05754255 -
Comparison of High-flow Oxygen With or Without Nasal Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) During Propofol Sedation for Colonoscopy in an Ambulatory Surgical Center
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02484105 -
Comforting Conversation During Colonoscopy: A Trial on Patient Satisfaction
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02264249 -
Residual Gastric Volume in Same Day Versus Split Dose and Evening Before Bowel Preparation
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01978509 -
The Affect of Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Hospitalized Patients Colonoscopies
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01964417 -
The Comparative Study Between Bowel Preparation Method
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01685970 -
Comparison of Same-day 2 Sachets Picosulfate Versus High Volume PEG for Afternoon Colonoscopy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01518790 -
Short Course, Single-dose PEG 3350 for Colonoscopy Prep in Children
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT00748293 -
Achievement of Better Examinee Compliance on Colon Cleansing Using Commercialized Low-Residue Diet
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00779649 -
MoviPrep® Versus HalfLytely®, Low-VolUme PEG Solutions for Colon Cleansing: An InvesTigator-blindEd, Randomized, Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00671177 -
Clinical Evaluation of Water Immersion Colonoscopy Insertion Technique
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00380497 -
Pico-Salax Versus Poly-Ethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleanout Before Colonoscopy in Children
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00160823 -
Impact of a Self-Administered Information Leaflet on Adequacy of Colonic Cleansing for in-Hospital Patients
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00314418 -
Patient Position and Impact on Colonoscopy Time
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00390598 -
PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 4L Versus Senna Glycoside (Pursennid® Ex-Lax) 36mg and PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 2L for Large Bowel Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopy
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00427089 -
Comparison of 2L NRL994 With NaP Preparation in Colon Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopies for Colon Tumor Screening
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00209573 -
A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection Versus Midazolam HCl for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Elective Colonoscopy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05823350 -
The Effect of Abdominal Massage on Pain and Distention After Colonoscopy
|
N/A |