Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04220905
Other study ID # CPHS 23578
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date November 1, 2017
Est. completion date May 2025

Study information

Verified date May 2021
Source White River Junction Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Contact Heiko Pohl, MD
Phone 8022959363
Email heiko.pohl@va.gov
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational [Patient Registry]

Clinical Trial Summary

This protocol describes a prospective cohort study. It addresses an important challenge in the prevention of colorectal cancer: how to safely and effectively remove large polyps.


Description:

Over recent years, a number of studies have been published that have highlighted factors associated with improved efficacy and safety of large polyp resection. Almost all of these studies originate from one large Australian cohort. It is unclear, whether the results are generalizable to other populations. It is important to understand if these findings can be duplicated, to further build on the gained knowledge. At the same time the technology of endoscopic resection is evolving. Established in 2012, the Large Polyp Study group aims to prospectively examine outcomes related to endoscopic large polyp removal. Enrollment of an ongoing randomized trial of 920 patients has just been completed and a second trial is planned. The primary aim of both trials is to understand whether a specific intervention will reduce the risk of adverse events. The added observational study will complement the trials in different ways: It will enroll patients who might not have been eligible for the trials and allow the application of other resection techniques. The observational study will therefore better represent the average patient who undergoes resection of a large polyp. Furthermore, it will add sample size to examine secondary outcomes with greater power. This is a continuation of NCT01936948 (Safety of Endoscopic Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps: A Randomized Trial) as a observational cohort. The continuation was approved by the institutional IRB as part of the initial RCT. At this point the investigators document the observational arm as its own study in this registry.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 1000
Est. completion date May 2025
Est. primary completion date May 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Any patient =18 who presents for a colonoscopy and who does not have criteria for exclusion - Patients with a =20mm colon polyp Exclusion Criteria: - Patients who are receiving an emergency colonoscopy - Patients with coagulopathy with an elevated INR =1.5, or platelets <50 - Poor bowel preparation - Pregnancy

Study Design


Locations

Country Name City State
United States White River Junction VAMC White River Junction Vermont

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
White River Junction Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Incidence of severe complications Aggregate of all severe adverse events that occur at the time of the procedure or during and up to 14 days of follow-up. Severe adverse events include bleeding, perforation, postpolypectomy syndrome, and clinical events that require an admission to the hospital. Up to 14 days following the procedure.
Primary Completeness of polyp resection Complete polyp removal is defined as removal of all visible polyp tissue at the end of the EMR, as assessed by the endoscopist. During the procedure
Primary Polyp recurrence Presence of biopsy proven neoplastic polyp tissue at the EMR resection site at surveillance colonoscopy following complete polyp resection. Up to 5 years (at next scheduled surveillance colonoscopy).
Secondary Severe bleeding complications Severe bleeding is defined as the need for hospitalization, transfusion, a repeat colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy, surgery, or interventional radiologyUp to 14 days following the procedure. Up to 14 days following the procedure.
Secondary Perforation Defined as a complete hole, or full-thickness resection of the muscularis propria (Sydney Classification of Deep Mural Injury Type IV) Up to 14 days following the procedure.
Secondary Postpolypectomy syndrome Defined as abdominal pain severe enough to warrant an ED visit or hospital admission and presence of leukocytosis and/or required treatment with antibiotics. Following the procedure up to 14 days.
Secondary Efficacy of submucosal injectate Volume of solution per lesion size (mL/cm2), time of resection. During the procedure.
Secondary Intraprocedural bleeding Immediate bleeding that requires endoscopic intervention to stop the bleeding (e.g. clip placement or snare tip soft coagulation or coagulation grasper). During the procedure
Secondary Need for colon resection Patients who require surgery for polyp removal or as a result of complications related to the EMR or follow up procedures. Up to 3 years following the procedure.
Secondary Technical skill of the endoscopist To perform video based assessment of endoscopic resection skills During the procedure
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04101097 - Training and Validation of Models of Factors to Predict Inadequate Bowel Preparation Colonoscopy
Completed NCT03247595 - Testing How Well Magnesium Citrate Capsules Work as Preparation for a Colonoscopy N/A
Completed NCT04214301 - An Open-Label Preference Evaluation of BLI800 Phase 4
Withdrawn NCT05754255 - Comparison of High-flow Oxygen With or Without Nasal Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) During Propofol Sedation for Colonoscopy in an Ambulatory Surgical Center N/A
Recruiting NCT02484105 - Comforting Conversation During Colonoscopy: A Trial on Patient Satisfaction Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT02264249 - Residual Gastric Volume in Same Day Versus Split Dose and Evening Before Bowel Preparation N/A
Completed NCT01964417 - The Comparative Study Between Bowel Preparation Method Phase 3
Terminated NCT01978509 - The Affect of Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Hospitalized Patients Colonoscopies N/A
Recruiting NCT01685970 - Comparison of Same-day 2 Sachets Picosulfate Versus High Volume PEG for Afternoon Colonoscopy Phase 3
Completed NCT01518790 - Short Course, Single-dose PEG 3350 for Colonoscopy Prep in Children N/A
Recruiting NCT00748293 - Achievement of Better Examinee Compliance on Colon Cleansing Using Commercialized Low-Residue Diet N/A
Completed NCT00779649 - MoviPrep® Versus HalfLytely®, Low-VolUme PEG Solutions for Colon Cleansing: An InvesTigator-blindEd, Randomized, Trial Phase 4
Completed NCT00671177 - Clinical Evaluation of Water Immersion Colonoscopy Insertion Technique N/A
Completed NCT00380497 - Pico-Salax Versus Poly-Ethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleanout Before Colonoscopy in Children Phase 4
Recruiting NCT00160823 - Impact of a Self-Administered Information Leaflet on Adequacy of Colonic Cleansing for in-Hospital Patients Phase 3
Completed NCT00314418 - Patient Position and Impact on Colonoscopy Time N/A
Completed NCT00390598 - PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 4L Versus Senna Glycoside (Pursennid® Ex-Lax) 36mg and PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 2L for Large Bowel Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopy Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT00209573 - A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection Versus Midazolam HCl for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Elective Colonoscopy Phase 3
Completed NCT00427089 - Comparison of 2L NRL994 With NaP Preparation in Colon Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopies for Colon Tumor Screening Phase 3
Completed NCT05823350 - The Effect of Abdominal Massage on Pain and Distention After Colonoscopy N/A