Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03479905
Other study ID # STU 102017-005
Secondary ID
Status Terminated
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date March 5, 2018
Est. completion date September 20, 2023

Study information

Verified date May 2024
Source University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

It is standard practice in the United States and many parts of world to perform Gastrointestinal endoscopy with the patient under deep intravenous sedation. Obesity is accepted as a patient specific risk factor for hypoxic events during procedural sedation for GI endoscopic procedures. The obese population has a higher prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which is characterized by repeated obstruction of the upper airway, and leads to apnea and desaturation. This prospective, randomized study was designed to compare the effectiveness of the high flow nasal cannula, standard nasal cannula and standard face mask in morbidly obese patients with a high risk of sleep apnea, (BMI greater than 40, STOPBANG greater or equal to 5) receiving deep intravenous sedation during colonoscopies. This study will assess which method leads to a lower incidence of intraoperative desaturation events compared to the current standard of care.


Description:

The prevalence of morbid obesity is increasing worldwide. As the severity of obesity increases, the incidence of diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea also rises. Studies have shown an incidence of sleep apnea as high as 64% in patients with a body mass index (BMI) over 40 and 100% in patients with a BMI greater than 60. Patients with OSA have been shown to have significant desaturations under intravenous sedation due to airway narrowing and obstruction. Several studies have also shown that morbidly obese subjects, independent of a diagnosis of OSA, run a higher perioperative risk of adverse airway events, including hypoxia. Providing anesthesia for this patient population is challenging and requires careful titration of drugs and superb airway management skills. The current standard of care for oxygen delivery in this setting is a Salter nasal cannula. Humidified high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy utilizes an air oxygen blend allowing from 21% to 100% FiO2 delivery and generates up to 60 L/min flow rates. The gas is heated (35 to 40 degree Celsius) and humidified through an active heated humidifier and delivered via a single limb heated inspiratory circuit (to avoid heat loss and condensation) to the subject through a large diameter nasal cannula. Theoretically, HFNC offers significant advantages in oxygenation and ventilation over conventional methods. Constant high flow oxygen delivery provides steady inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) and decreases oxygen dilution. It also washes out physiologic dead space and generates positive end expiration pressure (PEEP) that augments ventilation. Some studies have demonstrated a positive effect of HFNC on the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) showing that use of HFNC could decrease hypoxic episodes in subjects with repetitive upper airway obstruction such as obstructive sleep apnea. The STOP-BANG questionnaire (SB) has been used successfully to screen patients undergoing therapeutic endoscopic procedures at higher risk for sedation-related adverse events.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Terminated
Enrollment 143
Est. completion date September 20, 2023
Est. primary completion date January 7, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Age between 18-80 - Subjects undergoing colonoscopies - Morbidly obese BMI equal or greater than 40 - STOPBANG score equal or greater than 5 Exclusion Criteria: - Subjects deemed hemodynamically unstable by the anesthesia team - Subjects who are an aspiration risk and will require endotracheal intubation. - Pregnancy - Subjects with an allergy to propofol - Patients who are unable to tolerate the high flow nasal cannula secondary to discomfort - Subjects unwilling to sign consent - Patients that received medications other than lidocaine and propofol

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Salter nasal cannula
Oxygen will be delivered by using standard nasal cannula
Face mask
Oxygen will be delivered via face mask during colonoscopy
Device:
High Flow Nasal Cannula
A high flow nasal cannula will be placed on the patient at a setting of FiO2 100% and titrated up to 60L/min depending on patient tolerance. 60 L/min is the max flow rate and will be used as tolerated for maximum benefit.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Parkland Helath Hospital System Dallas Texas

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Oxygen saturation The frequency of desaturation episodes (SpO2 <90%) Intraoperative period
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04101097 - Training and Validation of Models of Factors to Predict Inadequate Bowel Preparation Colonoscopy
Completed NCT03247595 - Testing How Well Magnesium Citrate Capsules Work as Preparation for a Colonoscopy N/A
Completed NCT04214301 - An Open-Label Preference Evaluation of BLI800 Phase 4
Withdrawn NCT05754255 - Comparison of High-flow Oxygen With or Without Nasal Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) During Propofol Sedation for Colonoscopy in an Ambulatory Surgical Center N/A
Recruiting NCT02484105 - Comforting Conversation During Colonoscopy: A Trial on Patient Satisfaction Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT02264249 - Residual Gastric Volume in Same Day Versus Split Dose and Evening Before Bowel Preparation N/A
Terminated NCT01978509 - The Affect of Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Hospitalized Patients Colonoscopies N/A
Completed NCT01964417 - The Comparative Study Between Bowel Preparation Method Phase 3
Recruiting NCT01685970 - Comparison of Same-day 2 Sachets Picosulfate Versus High Volume PEG for Afternoon Colonoscopy Phase 3
Completed NCT01518790 - Short Course, Single-dose PEG 3350 for Colonoscopy Prep in Children N/A
Recruiting NCT00748293 - Achievement of Better Examinee Compliance on Colon Cleansing Using Commercialized Low-Residue Diet N/A
Completed NCT00779649 - MoviPrep® Versus HalfLytely®, Low-VolUme PEG Solutions for Colon Cleansing: An InvesTigator-blindEd, Randomized, Trial Phase 4
Completed NCT00671177 - Clinical Evaluation of Water Immersion Colonoscopy Insertion Technique N/A
Completed NCT00380497 - Pico-Salax Versus Poly-Ethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleanout Before Colonoscopy in Children Phase 4
Recruiting NCT00160823 - Impact of a Self-Administered Information Leaflet on Adequacy of Colonic Cleansing for in-Hospital Patients Phase 3
Completed NCT00314418 - Patient Position and Impact on Colonoscopy Time N/A
Completed NCT00390598 - PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 4L Versus Senna Glycoside (Pursennid® Ex-Lax) 36mg and PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 2L for Large Bowel Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopy Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT00427089 - Comparison of 2L NRL994 With NaP Preparation in Colon Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopies for Colon Tumor Screening Phase 3
Completed NCT00209573 - A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection Versus Midazolam HCl for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Elective Colonoscopy Phase 3
Completed NCT05823350 - The Effect of Abdominal Massage on Pain and Distention After Colonoscopy N/A