Colonoscopy Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Histological Quality and Adequacy of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps Resected Using Jumbo Versus Hot Biopsy Forceps
- Cold forceps polypectomy and hot biopsy forceps electrocauterization (HBF) are still
widely used methods for endoscopic resection of diminutive colorectal polyps
(DCPs)(polyps smaller than 5 mm). Jumbo forceps may be more effective in the removal of
DCPs because of their larger size.
- This was a prospective study of consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy and found
to have at least one diminutive polyp. One experienced endoscopist removed DCPs using
either jumbo or hot biopsy forceps.
- Aim was to evaluate the histological quality and adequacy of the DCPs resected using
jumbo forceps in comparison with HBF.
- Exclusion criteria were (i) having abnormal coagulation parameters and
thrombocytopenia, taking aspirin or other medications which could affect bleeding time,
(ii) history of inflammatory bowel disease, (iii) pregnancy.
- One experienced endoscopist carried out all the procedures using the same techniques.
- If a diminutive polyp was detected during colonoscopy, and it was estimated that the
polyp was eligible for the study, the patient was randomly assigned by the physician to
one of the two forceps groups (hot biopsy versus jumbo forceps) using a flipping coin
method. Polypectomy was then performed with the intention to remove all polypoid tissue
with one forceps bite. After the initial bite was obtained, the polypectomy site was
observed with visual inspection. If residual polypoid tissue was observed after the
first bite, additional biopsies were taken until visual eradication was attained.
- The size of the polyp was estimated during colonoscopy by visual comparison with the
open biopsy forceps (Open-biopsy forceps technique). Polypectomies were performed using
jumbo forceps (Conmed, USA) and hot biopsy forceps (Wilson-Cook Medical, USA). For HBF,
the technique was based on the procedure first described in 1973, as follows: slight
pulling force was applied to the polyp and then the electrocautery current was applied
until the white coagulum was seen at the polyp base. The technique for jumbo forceps
was as follows: after initial grasping, slight force was applied until the polyp was
separated from the stalk. The electrocautery current waveform and intensity settings
were the same for each patient. Each biopsy specimen was placed in a separate formalin
solution.
- An experienced blinded pathologist evaluated the tissue samples for depth of specimen,
amount of cautery damage (for hot biopsy forceps) or crush artifacts (for jumbo
forceps), architecture, fragmentation, overall diagnostic quality, evaluation and
positivity of surgical margins.
- All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows v. 15 (SPSS Inc.,
Chicago, IL, USA). Demographic, biochemical and histopathological features were
classified as continuous or categorical variables. Kolmogorov-Smirnov analysis was used
to test for Gaussian distribution. The data were expressed as arithmetic mean ±
standard deviation (SD), since the evaluated variables were Gaussian-distributed.
Comparisons between two groups were performed using the Student's t-test for continuous
variables. Categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test (2X2, 3X2 and 4X2
tables) and Fisher's exact test. When the chi-square test was used, Yates' correction
for continuity was used. All reported p-values were two-tailed, and those less than
0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04101097 -
Training and Validation of Models of Factors to Predict Inadequate Bowel Preparation Colonoscopy
|
||
Completed |
NCT03247595 -
Testing How Well Magnesium Citrate Capsules Work as Preparation for a Colonoscopy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04214301 -
An Open-Label Preference Evaluation of BLI800
|
Phase 4 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05754255 -
Comparison of High-flow Oxygen With or Without Nasal Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) During Propofol Sedation for Colonoscopy in an Ambulatory Surgical Center
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02484105 -
Comforting Conversation During Colonoscopy: A Trial on Patient Satisfaction
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02264249 -
Residual Gastric Volume in Same Day Versus Split Dose and Evening Before Bowel Preparation
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01978509 -
The Affect of Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Hospitalized Patients Colonoscopies
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01964417 -
The Comparative Study Between Bowel Preparation Method
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01685970 -
Comparison of Same-day 2 Sachets Picosulfate Versus High Volume PEG for Afternoon Colonoscopy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01518790 -
Short Course, Single-dose PEG 3350 for Colonoscopy Prep in Children
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT00748293 -
Achievement of Better Examinee Compliance on Colon Cleansing Using Commercialized Low-Residue Diet
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00779649 -
MoviPrep® Versus HalfLytely®, Low-VolUme PEG Solutions for Colon Cleansing: An InvesTigator-blindEd, Randomized, Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00671177 -
Clinical Evaluation of Water Immersion Colonoscopy Insertion Technique
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00380497 -
Pico-Salax Versus Poly-Ethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleanout Before Colonoscopy in Children
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00160823 -
Impact of a Self-Administered Information Leaflet on Adequacy of Colonic Cleansing for in-Hospital Patients
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00314418 -
Patient Position and Impact on Colonoscopy Time
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00390598 -
PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 4L Versus Senna Glycoside (Pursennid® Ex-Lax) 36mg and PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 2L for Large Bowel Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopy
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00427089 -
Comparison of 2L NRL994 With NaP Preparation in Colon Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopies for Colon Tumor Screening
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00209573 -
A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection Versus Midazolam HCl for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Elective Colonoscopy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05823350 -
The Effect of Abdominal Massage on Pain and Distention After Colonoscopy
|
N/A |