Colonic Polyps Clinical Trial
Official title:
Cold Snare Polypectomy vs Hot Snare Polypectomy vs APC for the Complete Removal of Left Sided Colon Polyps. A Prospective,Randomized Trial
Given the limited existing data regarding the advantages and limitations of the existing techniques in the removal of colonic polyps the investigators designed a prospective study in order to compare cold snare vs hot snare vs argon plasma coagulation for the compete removal of colonic polyps of the left colon up to a diameter of 0.8cm.
Adenomatous polyps are the most common neoplastic findings discovered in subjects who undergo
colonoscopy either for colorectal screening or during a diagnostic work-up for symptoms.
Currently small polyps 0.3-0.8cm are removed using hot snare polypectomy (HSP) cold snare
polypectomy (CSP) while argon plasma coagulation (APC) has been proposed for the
cauterization of bigger polyps ("Melt Effect") Endoscopic polypectomy is associated with
potential complications, i.e. perforation and bleeding while some polyps may recur after
polypectomy.
Given the limited existing data regarding the advantages and limitations of the existing
techniques in the removal of colonic polyps the investigators designed a prospective study in
order to compare the above mentioned methods for the compete removal of colonic polyps
0,3-0,8 cm from the left side colon.
METHODS The study will be conducted in the endoscopy unit of "Evangelismos" Hospital and in D
Surgical clinic of the University Hospital "Attikon".All consecutive patients with colorectal
polyps of the left colon (up to the splenic flexure) with a diameter of 0.3-0.8cm will be
prospectively randomized to three groups.
1. CSP: In this group polyps will be removed with the cold snare polypectomy technique, as
a single piece. Additionally, a 1-2mm of normal tissue around the small polyp will also
be ensnared in the CSP.
2. HSP: In this group polyps will be removed with the hot snare polypectomy technique as a
single piece with a electrosurgical snare and monopolar current with a setting of 30-35
W in the endocut function.
3. APC: In APC group polyps will be cauterized by application of high power argon plasma
coagulation on small waves at 50-60W and flow at 2lt/min.
All polyps will be elevated by submucosal injection of normal saline (1ml) and consequently a
special dye (1ml) containing carbon particles (Spot) before applying any of the three removal
techniques.
The injection solution protects from thermal injury of deeper layers during the application
of current and APC,also the injection of the dye (tattoo) at the polypectomy, ensures that
the endoscopist will detect the point of polypectomy in the follow up colonoscopy after 3-6
months.
Spot (GI supply,Camp Hill,PA) is the only commercially available suspension for endoscopic
tattooing approved by the Food and Drug Association (FDA). It contains prediluted sterile
syrings that are filled with highly purified fine carbon particles ready for endoscopic use.
The study excluded patients with a history of familial polyposis (FAP), Gardner's syndrome,
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, patients with colon Cancer as well as patients with idiopathic
inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
Statistical analysis showed that the sample required to give medium (W = 0.3) the difference
between the three groups is 108 patients, with significance level of 5% and validity of the
study 80% All patients included in the study will undergo a repeat colonoscopy in a 3-6 month
time period. The endoscopist based on tattoos have been received on the first endoscopy
during polypectomy will receive multiple biopsies from the point, which will be sent for
histological examination.The pathologist will then examine the tissue sample and will define
whereas the polyp has been completely eradicated or recurred.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05615857 -
Endocuff Enhanced Colonoscopy: Does it Improve Polyp Detection and Make Rectal Retroflexion Unnecessary
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02865382 -
Detection of Colorectal Adenoma by Optical Enhancement Technology vs. High-Definition Colonoscopy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02529007 -
Endo-cuff Assisted Vs. Standard Colonoscopy for Polyp Detection in Bowel Cancer Screening
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02245854 -
Efficacy and Safety of a New Polypectomy Snare for Cold-polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01712048 -
Submucosal Injection EMR vs. Underwater EMR for Colorectal Polyps
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01297712 -
Endoscopic Assessment of Polyp Histology
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01368289 -
Australian Multicentre Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT02196649 -
Clip Placement Following Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - Randomised Trial
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT00996619 -
Measuring the Spectrum of Tissues During Endoscopy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00997802 -
Japanese National Computed Tomographic (CT) Colonography Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00468455 -
Post-Op Quality of Life After Colorectal Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00018551 -
Chemoprevention With Folic Acid
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02552017 -
Accuracy of Detection Using ENdocuff Optimisation of Mucosal Abnormalities
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01979458 -
Photometric Stereo Endoscopy (PSE) as a Tool for Imaging the Rectum and Colon
|
N/A | |
Unknown status |
NCT01101672 -
Trial for Single Port Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Colectomy
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT01458925 -
Feasibility of Check-Cap's P1 Capsule System Screening
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05737017 -
The Efficacy and Safety of a Hybrid Hemostatic Device (ClearCoajet)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02760381 -
Acetic Acid for Optical Characterization of Colonic Polyps
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04253990 -
Efficacy and Safety of Precut-EMR for Resecting of Colonic Polyp
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01901510 -
Panchromoendoscopy Using Oral Indigo Carmine Mixed With Polyethylene Glycol Prep
|
Phase 1 |