Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

This study aims to compare the outcomes of patients who undergo single-port laparoscopic colectomy and conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasia (large polyp not amenable to endoscopic removal/ cancer) through a randomized controlled trial. After informed consent, patients will be randomized to have either conventional or single-port laparoscopic colectomy by a team of surgeons with good experience in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Patients' demographic, operative detail and post-operative outcomes including operating time, blood loss, complications, pain score, analgesic requirement, resumption of gastrointestinal function and length of hospital stay will be recorded prospectively. The patients will be blinded to the type of treatment that they have received during the first three days after operation (post-operative pain and analgesic requirement will be recorded in these period). Patients will have long term up to record for cancer recurrence and survival.

The results of two groups of patients will be compared scientifically to assess if single-incision laparoscopic colectomy results in any difference in outcomes when compared to conventional laparoscopic colectomy.


Clinical Trial Description

Conventionally laparoscopic surgery requires multiple abdominal wall incision for placement of ports and laparoscopic instrument to perform the operation. With the advancement of technology, laparoscopic surgery can now be performed through one special port which can accommodate several laparoscopic instruments to perform the operation and hence, require only one small 2-3cm incision through the umbilicus. This is commonly named as Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) or single-port laparoscopic surgery.

Compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, SILS has the advantage of further reduction of post-operative wound pain because of only one small abdominal incision is required. The cosmetic result from SILS is also better because the only incision is made through the umbilicus which can hide the wound effectively after operation. After complete healing of the umbilical wound, the patient's abdomen could be visually 'scarless'.

There has been no study to compare the results of the new single-port laparoscopic colectomy to the conventional laparoscopic colectomy in the literature yet. In order to decide if this new technique should be recommended to more patients for treatment of colonic neoplasia, a formal study is required. We designed a patient blinded randomized controlled trial to investigate if there is any difference between these two laparoscopic colectomies.

The primary outcome to be measured is post-operative pain on coughing and analgesia consumption. The patients will be blinded to the type of treatment that they have received during the first three days after operation. During these three days, the post-operative pain score and analgesic requirement will be recorded independently by the Pain team who is also blinded to the type of procedure.

The secondary to be measured include operating time, blood loss, morbidities and mortality, cancer recurrence and patient survival in long term. The secondary outcomes will also be recorded prospectively and compared.

Definition of conversion:

Conversion to conventional is defined as the need to place additional port to aid the procedure during the single port laparoscopic colectomy Conversion to open is defined as(1) the need to perform conventional laparotomy in order to accomplish the procedure or (2) premature abdominal incision for colorectal dissection or vascular control during single port or conventional laparoscopic colectomy. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT01101672
Study type Interventional
Source The University of Hong Kong
Contact Jensen TC Poon, MBBS
Phone 852-22554764
Email jp@hkma.org
Status Unknown status
Phase Phase 2/Phase 3
Start date November 2009
Completion date October 2011

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05615857 - Endocuff Enhanced Colonoscopy: Does it Improve Polyp Detection and Make Rectal Retroflexion Unnecessary N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02865382 - Detection of Colorectal Adenoma by Optical Enhancement Technology vs. High-Definition Colonoscopy N/A
Completed NCT02529007 - Endo-cuff Assisted Vs. Standard Colonoscopy for Polyp Detection in Bowel Cancer Screening N/A
Completed NCT02245854 - Efficacy and Safety of a New Polypectomy Snare for Cold-polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps N/A
Completed NCT01712048 - Submucosal Injection EMR vs. Underwater EMR for Colorectal Polyps N/A
Terminated NCT01297712 - Endoscopic Assessment of Polyp Histology N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT01368289 - Australian Multicentre Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Study
Completed NCT02196649 - Clip Placement Following Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - Randomised Trial N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT00996619 - Measuring the Spectrum of Tissues During Endoscopy N/A
Completed NCT00997802 - Japanese National Computed Tomographic (CT) Colonography Trial N/A
Completed NCT00468455 - Post-Op Quality of Life After Colorectal Surgery N/A
Completed NCT00018551 - Chemoprevention With Folic Acid Phase 2
Recruiting NCT02552017 - Accuracy of Detection Using ENdocuff Optimisation of Mucosal Abnormalities N/A
Completed NCT01979458 - Photometric Stereo Endoscopy (PSE) as a Tool for Imaging the Rectum and Colon N/A
Terminated NCT01458925 - Feasibility of Check-Cap's P1 Capsule System Screening N/A
Recruiting NCT05737017 - The Efficacy and Safety of a Hybrid Hemostatic Device (ClearCoajet) N/A
Recruiting NCT02760381 - Acetic Acid for Optical Characterization of Colonic Polyps N/A
Withdrawn NCT04253990 - Efficacy and Safety of Precut-EMR for Resecting of Colonic Polyp N/A
Completed NCT01901510 - Panchromoendoscopy Using Oral Indigo Carmine Mixed With Polyethylene Glycol Prep Phase 1
Completed NCT01761279 - High Definition Endoscopy With i-Scan for Small Colonic Polyp Evaluation: The HiScope Study N/A