Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01712048
Other study ID # 2012.070-2
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date September 2012
Est. completion date December 2019

Study information

Verified date February 2020
Source California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of two standard methods of polypectomy (polyp removal), submucosal injection-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and full water emersion (without submucosal injection) EMR, for large colorectal polyps.


Description:

The endoscopic resection of benign colon polyps (polypectomy) plays a vital role in the prevention of colo-rectal cancer. While, small pedunculated polyps are removed with ease, large flat lesions pose a greater challenge. As a result, special techniques have been developed to assist in the removal of these difficult polyps.

During conventional colonoscopy with polypectomy, the colon lumen is insufflated with air, which flattens polyps and thins the wall of the colon. These two factors increase the risk of procedural complications such as bleeding and perforation. In order to counter these drawbacks a technique, which involves the injection of saline into the submucosal area beneath the polyp, is commonly used for the resection of large flat polyps. Theoretically, the injection creates a "safety cushion" that reduces the risks of accidental ensnarement of the muscularis propria, which can lead to iatrogenic perforation and thermal injury to the deeper tissue layers. However, the submucosal injection technique is cumbersome in patients with particularly large polyps as multiple injections are often necessary, which can blur the line between normal and abnormal tissue.

Water emersion colonoscopy is a well-established alternative to conventional "air" colonoscopy and is in fact preferred by many endoscopists. Studies have shown that using water instead of air decreases the discomfort of colonoscopy, measured by the amount of sedative and pain medication used, time to complete the colonoscopy, and recovery time, and increases cecal intubation rates. Interventional Endoscopy Services (IES) at CPMC has taken the concepts of water emersion colonoscopy one step further in order to developed a novel method of "underwater" EMR. This technique was inspired by the observation that the muscularis propria of the colon retains its native thickness (1-2 mm) and circular configuration during underwater EUS examination. Furthermore, water immersion "floats" mucosal lesions away from the deeper wall layers, eliminating the need for a "safety cushion" created by submucosal injection. One drawback to the underwater technique is that in the case of poor preps, residual feces in the colon is suspended in the water, interfering with visualization. Additionally, the use of water often causes soiling of the gurney as a result of water seepage from the rectum during the procedure, which requires additional sanitary attention during the procedure.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 170
Est. completion date December 2019
Est. primary completion date December 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients age >18 years that are scheduled for endoscopic resection of large colo-rectal lesions who consent to this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients unable to provide informed consent.

- Patients with lesions showing adenoma invasion into the muscularis propria on EUS.

- Patients without at least one colo-rectal lesions = 20mm.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Submucosal Injection EMR
Selective saline injection is applied to the layer of tissue underneath the polyp in order to create a "safety cushion" for resection. EMR is then performed with a standard snare.
Underwater EMR
Polypectomy is performed under full water emersion without the use of submucosal injection.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States California Pacific Medical Center San Francisco California

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (5)

Kudo S, Kashida H, Nakajima T, Tamura S, Nakajo K. Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of early colorectal cancer. World J Surg. 1997 Sep;21(7):694-701. Review. — View Citation

Nelson DB. Techniques for difficult polypectomy. MedGenMed. 2004 Oct 25;6(4):12. Review. — View Citation

Norton ID, Wang L, Levine SA, Burgart LJ, Hofmeister EK, Rumalla A, Gostout CJ, Petersen BT. Efficacy of colonic submucosal saline solution injection for the reduction of iatrogenic thermal injury. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Jul;56(1):95-9. — View Citation

ROSENBERG N. Submucosal saline wheal as safety factor in fulguration or rectal and sigmoidal polypi. AMA Arch Surg. 1955 Jan;70(1):120-2. — View Citation

Zarchy T. Risk of submucosal saline injection for colonic polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997 Jul;46(1):89-90. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Adenoma recurrence rate 6 months
Secondary Adverse event rate 48 hours
Secondary Procedure time 24 hours
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05615857 - Endocuff Enhanced Colonoscopy: Does it Improve Polyp Detection and Make Rectal Retroflexion Unnecessary N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02865382 - Detection of Colorectal Adenoma by Optical Enhancement Technology vs. High-Definition Colonoscopy N/A
Completed NCT02529007 - Endo-cuff Assisted Vs. Standard Colonoscopy for Polyp Detection in Bowel Cancer Screening N/A
Completed NCT02245854 - Efficacy and Safety of a New Polypectomy Snare for Cold-polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps N/A
Terminated NCT01297712 - Endoscopic Assessment of Polyp Histology N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT01368289 - Australian Multicentre Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Study
Completed NCT02196649 - Clip Placement Following Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - Randomised Trial N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT00996619 - Measuring the Spectrum of Tissues During Endoscopy N/A
Completed NCT00997802 - Japanese National Computed Tomographic (CT) Colonography Trial N/A
Completed NCT00468455 - Post-Op Quality of Life After Colorectal Surgery N/A
Completed NCT00018551 - Chemoprevention With Folic Acid Phase 2
Recruiting NCT02552017 - Accuracy of Detection Using ENdocuff Optimisation of Mucosal Abnormalities N/A
Completed NCT01979458 - Photometric Stereo Endoscopy (PSE) as a Tool for Imaging the Rectum and Colon N/A
Unknown status NCT01101672 - Trial for Single Port Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Colectomy Phase 2/Phase 3
Terminated NCT01458925 - Feasibility of Check-Cap's P1 Capsule System Screening N/A
Recruiting NCT05737017 - The Efficacy and Safety of a Hybrid Hemostatic Device (ClearCoajet) N/A
Recruiting NCT02760381 - Acetic Acid for Optical Characterization of Colonic Polyps N/A
Withdrawn NCT04253990 - Efficacy and Safety of Precut-EMR for Resecting of Colonic Polyp N/A
Completed NCT01901510 - Panchromoendoscopy Using Oral Indigo Carmine Mixed With Polyethylene Glycol Prep Phase 1
Completed NCT01761279 - High Definition Endoscopy With i-Scan for Small Colonic Polyp Evaluation: The HiScope Study N/A