View clinical trials related to Colonic Polyp.
Filter by:It is estimated that about 20% of colonoscopies have inadequate preparation. (5) This is associated with lengthy procedures and less detection of adenomas, reduces the screening intervals, and increases the costs and risks of complications. Several strategies have been proposed to improve the quality of bowel preparation. Mobile healthcare Apps have been developed to increase adherence to bowel preparation agents, improving the quality of bowel preparation. However, adherence to mobile healthcare Apps is also a quality criterion and a pending problem to solve with this new technology. GastroBot is a new technology based on artificial intelligence that allows, through a software bot, to carry out a personalized follow-up of the patient's bowel cleansing, advising the patient to overcome contingencies that arise with the preparation, which in other circumstances could lead to the failure of it. The primary aim of this study is to determine the improvement in bowel preparation after GastroBot assistance compared with the traditional explanation. As a secondary aim, this study also pursues to determine adenoma and polyp detection rates (ADR and PDR, respectively), bowel preparation agents' tolerance, and GastroBot functionality.
To conduct an single blinded, non-randomized, prospective, single center trial to validate the performance of a novel state-of-the-art Artificial Intelligence model (AI-Model) for colorectal lesion detection during routine diagnostic colonoscopy and to evaluate its feasibility in daily endoscopy. Consecutive patients referred for a screening, surveillance or diagnostic colonoscopy will be included
Management of unexpected malignant colorectal polyps removed endoscopically can be challenging due to the risk of residual tumor and lymphatic spread. International studies have shown that in patients choosing surgical management instead of watchful waiting, 54-82% of bowel resections are without evidence of residual tumor or lymphatic spread. As surgical management entails risks of complications and watchful waiting management entails risks of residual disease or recurrence, a clinical dilemma arises when choosing a management strategy. Shared decision making (SDM) is a concept that can be used in preference sensitive decision making to facilitate patient involvement, empowerment, and active participation in the decision making process. This is a clinical multicenter, non-randomized, interventional phase II study involving Danish surgical departments planned to commence in the first quarter of 2024. The aim of the study is to examine whether shared decision making and using a patient decision aid (PtDA) in consultations affects patients' choice of management compared with historical data. The secondary aim is to investigate Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) using questionnaire feedback directly from the patients.
randomized, controlled single center, single investigator study mainly in colorectal screening population in daily practice with and without artificial intelliegence (AI) named DiscoveryTM from Pentax medical. Patient randomly are allocated to one of four groups: Pentax i10 colonoscopes without any additional device, Pentax i 10 with DiscoveryTM (AI), Pentax i 10 with EndocuffTM and Pentax i10 with EndocuffTM and DiscoveryTM (AI). The different groups are compared in terms of the different parameters: e.g. time of endoscopy, polyps (PDR) and adenoma detected (ADR).
PURPOSE OF PROTOCOL Objective: To evaluate if the speedometer based on the real-time image analysis can help endoscopists increase their withdrawal time, which is defined as time spent examining the colon during withdrawal of the colonoscope, during colonoscopy. Hypothesis: The trial hypothesis is that use of the speedometer during colonoscopy will increase the average withdrawal time, which is defined as time spent examining the colon during withdrawal of the colonoscope, by 1.6 minutes, possibly increasing the performance of the participating endoscopists. Our objective is to clarify the clinical benefits of this digital tool in colonoscopy. Endpoint: Withdrawal time difference between colonoscopies done without the speedometer (control period) and colonoscopies done with the speedometer (intervention period).
Colonoscopy is a common endoscopic procedure which the UVA Gastroenterology & Hepatology department performs on a daily basis for both screening/surveillance and diagnostic/therapeutic intent. As a safety net hospital, the institution also offers open access colonoscopy as a means of allowing outside primary care and urgent care providers a way to have patients receive necessary endoscopy services. However, these patients are not all seen in clinic prior to their procedure but are all prescribed a specific bowel prep by a medical professional who screens the referrals. Given that the patient population described above are often not well-known to UVA providers, they may be prescribed prep regimens that are not ideal for their comorbidities. Not infrequently, these patients show up to their colonoscopies with an inadequate bowel prep, leading to either cancelled or incomplete procedures, increased healthcare and personal financial costs (such as missed wages from taking off work), suboptimal endoscopy resource utilization, and delay in or missed polyp (or potentially cancer) detection. The investigators seek to use a novel scoring system designed to predict patients at risk for suboptimal preps (and hence patients that would benefit from an extended prep) and apply it in uniform fashion to a patient population most at risk for suboptimal preps. Because obtaining written consent is not practical given that these patients may not be seen by a UVA provider prior to their endoscopic procedure, the investigators will plan to verbally consent via the telephone in an all-inclusive manner; there will be no randomization but rather the selection of prep to be determined by the novel scoring system. Subjects be prescribed either a standard split-dose GoLytely prep (or SuPrep) or an extended split-dose GoLytely prep. The investigators predict that utilizing this new system will lead to a decreased number of inadequate bowel preps and will increase polyp detection. The investigators will work with a UVA biostatistician to analyze the data and use Chi Square, student's T tests, and logistic regression models to assess significance and help validate the model.
Adenomas are polyps of the colorectum that have the potential to develop into colon cancer. However, some adenomas never become malignant tumors, or if so, progression from adenoma into cancer takes a long time. As a result, screening colonoscopy programs were established in order to detect and resect adenomas at an early stage. After resection, polyps should be sent to pathology in order to make a histological diagnosis. Approximately 40-50% of all polyps have adenomatous histology whereas others contain benign histology (e.g. hyperplastic or inflammatory polyps). The latter polyps do not bear the risk to develop colon cancer. The bigger a polyp is the greater the chance is of it being malignant. During colonoscopy polyp size can be estimated visually by comparing the polyp with an opened biopsy forceps. The span of an opened forceps is 7 mm. Prior to using this technique, the forceps has to be inserted into the colon through a small working channel of the endoscope. Information on the actual adenoma size is crucial as surveillance recommendations depend on the size of the resected polyps. Moreover current guidelines contain the possibilities to disregard hyperplastic polyps in the sigmoid colon if the polyp size is below 5 mm. This means that diminutive hyperplastic polyps (< 5mm) do not necessarily require resection due to their benign dignity. However, there is increasing evidence that large human bias effects exist in estimating the size of polypoid lesions. For example, it has been shown that endoscopists exhibit terminal digit preferences leading to an exaggeration of estimated polyp size. In consequence the human bias problem might lead to wrong adenoma surveillance decisions. There is no doubt that technical devices are needed which can support endoscopists in finding the right declaration of polyp sizes. The aim of the current project is to create a computer program that is able to automatically measure polyp sizes during colonoscopy.
The investigators want to verify in a randomised trial, the effectiveness of EndoClotTM in preventing post-procedural bleeding after EMR (Endoscopic Mucosal Resection) or ESD (Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection) for sessile lesions >20 mm in the right colon