View clinical trials related to Colonic Diseases.
Filter by:Artificial intelligence is deeply integrated with medical diagnosis, and intelligent colonoscopy technology has broad room for development. At present, the assist device of colonoscopy is insufficiently studied. It is the part that needs to be further explored in the development of artificial intelligence colon diagnosis and treatment technology. The study will be conducted at the Digestive Endoscopy Center and it is expected that 380 subjects will participate voluntarily. Subjects met: 1) routine colonoscopy; 2) willing to provide relevant information required by the experiment; 3) signed informed consent for the study. This topic focuses on the colonoscope assist device, through the combination of power assisting device, dynamic analysis, and migration expert skills, to achieve a combination of intelligent power and precise treatment, and establish a prototype of the patient-colonoscopy-assisted assist system-doctor's four-in-one diagnosis and treatment system.
An adequate level of bowel preparation before colonoscopy has an extremely relevant impact on lesion detection and procedure success. The inpatient status represents a well-known independent predictor for inadequate colon cleansing. A recent prospective, multicentre, Italian study among inpatients showed that an adequate colon cleansing was achieved in 60-70% of patients, far below the ideal threshold of 90%. Interestingly, a higher rate of adequate colon cleansing was reported for a very low-volume (1L) polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based preparation when compared to 4L and 2L PEG-based solutions. However, this finding has to be confirmed as the study was not controlled and the PEG-1L group was much smaller than the other two. Aim of the present multicenter randomized controlled study will be to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of a novel very-low volume (1L) PEG-based preparation vs. standard-of-care low-volume (2L) and high-volume (4L) PEG-based purge, among inpatients who undergo colonoscopy.
Adequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy has an extremely relevant impact on diagnostic yield and procedural success. The guidelines recommend an adequate colon cleansing rate of at least 90% of procedures. It has been shown that patients with inadequate colon cleansing history have a high probability of not reaching an adequate bowel preparation again. Surprisingly, no evidence-based recommendations are available regarding bowel preparation in the patient with inadequate colon cleansing history. Therefore, identifying the factors associated with repeated inadequacy of bowel cleansing is crucial in order to define the best preparation strategy in this subset of patients. The implications for patients and for healthcare system are many: improving the quality of bowel preparation would reduce the need to repeat colonoscopy and the risk of conducting unreliable examinations. Furthermore, it would reduce the costs for the healthcare system by avoiding to overload endoscopic units. Inclusion criteria: Outpatient and hospitalized patients, adults, candidates for colonoscopy for any pathology, as part of the normal care process, with the need to repeat bowel preparation due to inadequate cleansing. Exclusion criteria: - Emergency regime - Inability to obtain consent - Refusal of the patient Primary end-point: Identification of factors independently associated with repeated inadequate colon cleansing after inadequate bowel preparation at previous colonoscopy, and consequent development (and validation) of a predictive model. The colon cleansing will be evaluated according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), which assigns a score from 0 (presence of solid stools) to 3 (excellent visualization of the colonic mucosa) for each of the three main segments of the colon, i.e. right colon, transverse colon and left-rectum colon. Colon cleansing will be judged inadequate in case of a total score <6 or a score <2 even in only one of the colic segments. Secondary end-point: • Assess the prevalence of repeated inadequate bowel cleansing in the patient with previous inadequate cleansing
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of alectinib in participants with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-positive locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors other than lung cancer.
The current diagnostic process of colonic motility disorders often takes a long time and involves multiple invasive, painful and/or unnecessary diagnostic procedures. To improve this diagnostic process, the potential of Electro-Entero-Graphy (EEnG) is investigated. During the EEnG procedure, several surface electrodes are positioned (under ultrasound guidance) on the abdomen so that electrical activity originating in the colon can be measured. Measurements will be performed after a period of fasting (when the colon is 'silent') and just after a meal (when the colon is moving) in both participants suffering from colonic motility disorders and healthy controls. It is hypothesized that these measurements are an indication of colonic motility and can be used as a diagnostic tool for colonic motility disorders. It is also hypothesized that this EEnG procedure is not more burdensome than the Gold Standard procedures for diagnosing colonic motility disorders. This will be assessed using questionnaires.
Background: Colorectal cancer is the most frequent neoplasm and the second cause of cancer death in Spain. Colon cleansing is critical for visualization of lesions at colonoscopy. High-quality cleansing allows for correct detection and resection of all lesions and may contribute to adequate risk stratification and follow-up interval. Low-volume laxatives improve tolerance of the colonoscopy preparation without reducing its effectiveness. Currently, the most widely used low-volume laxatives are one liter of Polyethylene glycol + ascorbate (PEG1A) and sodium picosulfate + magnesium citrate (PSCM). The evidence on the comparison of laxatives to achieve a high-quality colonic cleansing is very scarce. Hypothesis: Polyethylene glycol 1 liter with ascorbate is superior to sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate in high-quality colon cleansing. Objective: Overall objective: To compare the global high-quality cleansing frequency between the two laxatives using the Harefield Scale (HS). The primary objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority in global high-quality cleansing of PEG1A compared to PSCM. If non-inferiority is demonstrated, superiority of PEG1A will be analyzed. Specific objectives: - Frequency of global high-quality cleansing using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). - Frequency of adequate-quality cleansing using the HS and BBPS scales. - Tolerance and adverse effects of both laxatives. - Detection of lesions, total adenomas, advanced adenomas, total serrated lesions, advanced serrated lesions and colorectal cancer. - Detection of neoplastic lesions in the different colon segments (proximal, transverse, descending, sigmoid and rectum). - Association between detected lesions and the quality of the preparation, according to the HS and BBPS scales. Methods: Phase 4, multi-centric, randomized, single-blind (endoscopist), parallel study with two treatment arms: PEG1A (Pleinvue®) and PSCM (Citrafleet®).
The purpose of this study is to develop and validate the accuracy and reliability of an artificial intelligence(AI) system for bowel preparation quality scoring based of Boston Bowel preparation Scoring(BBPS). Then evaluate whether this AI system can help endoscopists to improve the quality of colonoscopy in clinical practice.
It is difficult to measure the several levels of intracranial pressure during abdominal surgery, and direct monitoring with intracranial devices is often impossible. Measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) via ultrasonography has been developed as an alternative method for evaluating intracranial pressure. Increased intracranial pressure may cause in expanding of the optic nerve sheath and may increase the diameter. Therefore, measuring the diameter of the optic nerve sheath via ultrasonography is considered as a non-invasive, easy-to-apply and reliable method to evaluate intracranial pressure.
The PREEMPT CRC study is a prospective multi-center observational study to validate a blood-based test for the early detection of colorectal cancer by collecting blood samples from average-risk participants who will undergo a routine screening colonoscopy.
The aim of this study is to evaluate patient and consultant experiences with phone consultations for endoscopy-related outpatient appointments during the COVID-19 outbreak.