Clinical Trials Logo

Colon Adenoma clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Colon Adenoma.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03254498 Completed - Colonic Neoplasms Clinical Trials

Detection in Tandem Endocuff Cap Trial

DETECT
Start date: April 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

A randomised back to back study comparing cap and Endocuff to detect adenomas during colonoscopy

NCT ID: NCT02980562 Completed - Colon Adenoma Clinical Trials

Comparison of Low Volume PEG-Asc and Lower Volume PEG-Asc With Bisacodyl

Start date: May 2015
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Recently a low-volume polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid (PEG-Asc) formulation has proven as safe and effective as traditional 4-L PEG solutions for colonoscopy preparation. However, currently available aqueous purgative formulations are poorly tolerated. The aim of this study was to compare a split-dose 2-L PEG-Asc and a 1-L PEG-Asc with bisacodyl (10 mg) formulation to determine the quality of bowel cleansing and patient tolerability.

NCT ID: NCT02819492 Completed - Colon Adenoma Clinical Trials

Side Specific Withdrawal Times for Colonoscopy: Impact on Adenoma Detection in the Proximal and Distal Colon

SNOWCAT
Start date: November 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Adenoma detection in the main goal of screening colonoscopy. In order to detect adenomas it is mandatory to spend a long enough time investigating the colonic mucosa. A minimum observation time of 6 minutes has been proposed as a quality criterion for screening colonoscopy. However, different locations of the colon (proximal, distal) may require specific observation time periods. The colon can be divided into a proximal (right) and distal (left) part. Until now, it is unclear whether observation time has a significant impact on adenoma detection in both parts of the colon. The aim of this study therefore is to conduct a trial in which side-specific observation times and adenoma detection rates are measured in order to investigate this correlation in particular for the right colon.

NCT ID: NCT02250196 Completed - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing Low-volume Bowel Preparation Methods

Start date: March 2013
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Colonoscopy is a common screening method to detect polyps and CRC. With the early detection of CRC through screening colonoscopy, patients could have better therapeutic effects and outcomes. In population screening programs, an increase in completed colonoscopies is related to a decrease in mortality from CRC. However, the miss rate for detecting colorectal neoplastic polyps of colonoscopy is 5-28%. The reluctance of participants to undergo bowel preparation results in the relatively low rate of detection of polyps and CRC, because poor preparation interferes with successful colon mucosa examination during a colonoscopy. Low-volume bowel preparations provide equivalent cleansing effect compared with standard 4 liter polyethylene glycol. However, studies comparing the superiority between low-volume bowel preparations are rare, and results are controversial. This study aimed to compare the bowel cleansing quality and tolerability between split-dose sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid.

NCT ID: NCT02009774 Completed - Clinical trials for Colorectal Carcinoma

Accuracy of the Optical Diagnosis of Small Colonic Polyps Using the Nice Classification

ADOPTION
Start date: January 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Adenomas and hyperplastic polyps are polypoid lesion and may occur at any location in the colon. At the present moment, all polyps should be resected endoscopically, although only adenomas, but not hyperplastic polyps have the potential to develop colorectal cancer. This approach enables the conduction of microscopic investigations of the lesions. By today, only the pathological diagnosis can distinguish exactly between adenomas and hyperplastic polyps. Some studies have investigated the value of the socalled optical biopsy method. Optical biopsy means the visual assessment of the polyp and the determination of a diagnosis solely on behalf of optical criteria. This method is conducted in real time during colonoscopy. If it can be shown, that endoscopist using optical biopsy are able to predict histopathological diagnoses of colonic polyps sufficiently this would possibly lead to simplification of diagnostic procedures. For instance, it would be conceivable to resect hyperplastic polyps and small adenomas and discard them without further assessment by a pathologist. Gastroenterological societies demand for a 90 percent accordance between diagnoses set by endoscopists and pathologists as a prerequisite for the implementation of the optical biopsy method. In this study we want to proof that the use of a new narrow-band imaging (NBI) tool (Exera III, Olmpus) is capable to rise accuracy of optically ascertained diagnoses of colonic polyps. NBI is a light filter tool which can be activated by pressing a button at the endoscope. NBI function leads to an endoscopic picture which appears blue and enables endoscopists to better assess surface structures and vascular patterns. In a prospective randomised multicenter setting we plan to conduct colonoscopy in 380 patients. Half of the patients will be examined without use of NBI (control arm). In these cases colonoscopists will assess optical diagnosis of polyps without turning on the NBI tool. If polyps are detected in patients belonging to the intervention arm NBI will be used and optical diagnosis will be determined using the NICE (NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic) classification. All polyps will be resected and send to pathology for further microscopic assessment. After completing the trial we aim to compare accuracy of the optical diagnosis in both groups. Our hypothesis is, that by using the new NBI tool accuracy (accordance between optical and histopathological diagnosis) can be increased from 78% to 90%.

NCT ID: NCT01778192 Completed - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing Polyethylene Glycol and Sodium Picosulphate With Magnesium Citrate

Start date: July 2012
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Adequate bowel cleansing is important for a completeness of colonoscopy and detection of colon polyps. Inadequate bowel preparation leads to longer duration of colonoscopy and obscured mucosal visualization resulting in missed lesions. Bowel cleansing agents are simply classified into the large volume, iso-osmotic polyethylene glycol (PEG) based solutions or the small volume osmotically active agents, such as sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate (SPMC). There are rare reports that compare directly conventional polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution and sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) for bowel preparation in korea. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of different regimens of SPMC and PEG solution.