Cognitive Function Clinical Trial
Official title:
Moving While Thinking or Thinking While Moving? Comparison of the Cognitive, Dual-task and Physical Effects of 6 Programs With Older Adults
While the association of physical and/or motor and/or cognitive components with training can generate synergistic effects and thus create an efficient cognitive enrichment program, very few studies have focused on finding an optimal combined program for older adults. According to the model of Herold and his colleagues, there are two modalities of simultaneous combined training: Thinking While Moving (TwM), when the additional cognitive task is not linked to the motor task, and Moving While Thinking (MwT), when the cognitive task is integrated into the motor task. They assume the latter approach is the most promising for improving cognitive reserve. Nevertheless, to the investigators' knowledge, only one study has compared these two modalities in older adults and none has broadened the question by comparing several MwT trainings. The goal of this interventional study will be to compare the cognitive, dual-task, and physical effects of 6 physical and/or cognitive programs in healthy but inactive older adults. The main questions it will aims to answer are: - Will the Moving While Thinking and Thinking While Moving programs have the same effects? - If they have different effects, which will be the best way to improve cognitive, dual-task, and physical functions? The study is being set up between 2023 and 2025 to compare the cognitive, dual- ask and physical effects of 6 programs (3 months, 2 sessions of 1 hour per week). Three experimental MwT programs will be studied: Immersive and interactive wall exergames (I2WE), Complex Cognitive and Motor Activities (2CMA), and exergames with Switch (EXER). They will be compared to an experimental TwM program of stationary bike simultaneous to the Switch (Video games + bike) and 2 control programs: inactive video games (VG) and stationary bike (BIKE). A control group (CON) will be also created. Cognitive, dual-task, and physical pre-tests (before the program), post-tests (after the program), and retention tests (3 months after the end of the program) will be realized to evaluate the effects of the programs.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 168 |
Est. completion date | May 15, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | December 15, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 60 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - be over 60 years old - have a MMSE score above 27 - engage in less than 2.5 hours of physical activity per week assessed by the QAPPA - score 3 or higher on a subjective health Likert-scale (1= very poor to 5= very good) - be retired - have no major pathology - have normal or corrected vision and hearing - have no difficulty bending or using their shoulders - do not frequently play video games or exergames - present a medical certificate not contraindicating physical activity). Exclusion Criteria: - |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | Club seniors Kennedy | Créteil | |
France | Centre Sportif Arthur Ashe | Montreuil | |
France | UFR STAPS Paris Cité | Paris |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Alexandra Perrot | Université Paris Cité |
France,
Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-81. — View Citation
de Souto Barreto P. Construct and convergent validity and repeatability of the Questionnaire d'Activite Physique pour les Personnes Agees (QAPPA), a physical activity questionnaire for the elderly. Public Health. 2013 Sep;127(9):844-53. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2012.10.018. Epub 2012 Nov 10. — View Citation
Eggenberger P, Schumacher V, Angst M, Theill N, de Bruin ED. Does multicomponent physical exercise with simultaneous cognitive training boost cognitive performance in older adults? A 6-month randomized controlled trial with a 1-year follow-up. Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Aug 17;10:1335-49. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S87732. eCollection 2015. — View Citation
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available. — View Citation
Gellish RL, Goslin BR, Olson RE, McDonald A, Russi GD, Moudgil VK. Longitudinal modeling of the relationship between age and maximal heart rate. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 May;39(5):822-9. doi: 10.1097/mss.0b013e31803349c6. — View Citation
Herold F, Hamacher D, Schega L, Muller NG. Thinking While Moving or Moving While Thinking - Concepts of Motor-Cognitive Training for Cognitive Performance Enhancement. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018 Aug 6;10:228. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00228. eCollection 2018. — View Citation
Kraft E. Cognitive function, physical activity, and aging: possible biological links and implications for multimodal interventions. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2012;19(1-2):248-63. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2011.645010. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Perceived pleasure | The French version of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale with a scale from completely disagree (1) to completely agree (7) will be used to evaluate the perceived pleasure. The score will be between 7 and 70. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | within 1 week after the program | |
Other | Feeling questionnaire | The feeling questionnaire will be completed at the end of the program. It will consist of 4 questions following a 5-point Likert-scale, concerning (a) the difficulty of the sessions, (b) their physical and (c) cognitive developments, and (d) the desire to continue a program of this type. The score will be between 1 and 5 for each element. Higher scores mean a better outcome | within 1 week after the program | |
Other | General Lifestyle change | The General Lifestyle Questionnaire (GLQ) assesses 46 types of behaviors and activities practiced in the last 12 months. The GLQ assesses five dimensions of lifestyle: "physical," "cognitive," "social," "other leisure activities" and "sleep and consumption (food, tobacco and alcohol)." The GLQ scores are calculated according to the frequency of practice of each activity or behavior. For each item, participants will indicate the frequency on a 5-point Likert-scale scoring 1 = never, 2 = a few times in the last year, 3 = a few times per month, 4 = a few times per week, 5 = every day or almost every day, and 8 items use inverse scoring. The averages of the five dimensions will be calculated, as well as the overall mean. | Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. | |
Other | Physical effort intensity | effort intensity will be evaluated at each season with a Polar Verity Sense heart rate monitor. The Heart Rate Reserve (HRR), the difference between the Maximum Theoretical Heart Rate (MTHR = 192 - 0.007 x age²) and the Resting Heart Rate (RHR), is used to calculate exercise intensity. For all sessions, the mean intensity was calculated [(Average Heart Rate - RHR)/HRR] x 100] | up to 12 weeks | |
Other | perceived physical effort intensity | perceived effort intensity will be evaluated with the modified Borg Scale, a Likert scale from 0 to 10, with 0 = complete rest and 10 = extremely strong). | up to 12 weeks | |
Other | perceived cognitive effort intensity | perceived cognitive effort intensity will be evaluated with a Likert scale from 0 to 10, with 0 = complete rest and 10 = extremely strong). | up to 12 weeks | |
Primary | Change Visuospatial memory | Visuospatial memory will be evaluated with the Spatial Span Test, a subtest of the Weschler Memory Scale. In the first part, the participant reproduces in the same order a sequence of cubes designated by the examiner. In the second, the participant reproduces a sequence of movements in reverse order. The number of cubes increases progressively and determines the spatial span and the backward spatial span. For each level, the participant always performs 2 trials and scores 1 point for each successful trial. The test ends when 2 errors are made at the same level. | Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. | |
Primary | Change Flexibility | Flexibility will be evaluated with the Trail Making Test. Part A consists in linking a series of increasing numbers from 1 to 25 by selecting the appropriate number. In part B, the participants connect 2 series of symbols in alternation: 1 of numbers and 1 of letters. This has to be done without lifting the pen from the paper and as quickly as possible. If mistakes are made, the examiner informs the participant, who has to correct them. Flexibility is highlighted specifically by analyzing the time difference in the result B-A, a purer measure of flexibility. | Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. | |
Primary | Change Inhibition with witty | It will be performed with a set of eight semaphores which are equipped with a LED matrix. The participant will be standing, facing a specially designed rack with semaphores. They will have to turn off as fast as possible the lights that appear, according to the instructions given, and will have to move back their hand to the middle of their hips. The tests consist of 20 trials, each trial starts 1500ms after the previous response. The total time to complete the tests will be recorded in milliseconds. In part A, the participant will have to turn off the semaphores that were randomly lit up red. The others remained unenlightened. In part B, the participant will have to turn off the semaphores that were randomly lit up with the green letter O. The others lit up with other colors associated with a letter. In part C, the participant will have to turn off the semaphores randomly lit up with the green letter O. The others lit up in green are associated with another letter. | Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. | |
Primary | Change cognitive-cognitive Dual task | To evaluate the cognitive-cognitive Dual Task capacity, the cognitive tasks will be first realized separately as a single task, and then concomitantly. For the Sound counting task, the participant will have to count in their mind the number of high-pitched sounds among low-pitched sounds that they heard, for 2 minutes. At the end of the 2 minutes, the participant will have to give the number of high-pitched sounds counted. The percentage between the number given by the participant and the correct number will be calculated. For the Go no Go Test, the participant will have to press a key as quickly as possible when they see the "X" symbol and not press when they see the "+" symbol, for 2 minutes. The reaction time, the number of correct answers, and errors will be recorded. | Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. | |
Primary | Change physical-cognitive Dual Task | To evaluate the physical-cognitive Dual Task capacity, the cognitive and the physical task will be first realized separately as a single task, and then concomitantly. For the Operation counting task, the participant will subtract 7 from a starting number (e.g., 286) as many times as possible for one minute. The number of correct answers, as well as errors, will be recorded. For the STEP test, the participant will do as many repetitions as possible, going up and down a step, one foot after the other, for 2 minutes. | Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. | |
Secondary | Upper body strength change | Upper body strength will be evaluated with the Chair-stand test. The participant will have to stand and sit up as many times as possible in 30 seconds. The arms will be crossed on the chest, the feet still on the ground. The number of chair-stand will be recorded. | Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. | |
Secondary | Lower body flexibility change | Lower body flexibility will be evaluated with the Chair-sit-and-reach test. Sitting on the edge of a chair, one leg straight, the other bent, the participant will have to bring their hand as close as possible to the foot of the straight leg. The number of centimeters between the hand and the foot will be measured. The values are negative if the fingers of the hand extended beyond the toes. | Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. | |
Secondary | Dynamical balance change | The dynamical balance will be evaluated with the TUG test. The participant will have to get up from a chair, walk around a block located in front of them, 3 meters away, and sit down again as quickly as possible. The time to complete this course will be recorded. | Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. | |
Secondary | Upper body flexibility change | Upper body flexibility will be evaluated with the Back-scratch test. The participant will have to bring their two hands as close together as possible (one hand reaching over the shoulder, palm against the back, the other reaching to the middle of the back, back of the hand against the back). The number of centimeters between both hands will be measured. The values are negative if the fingers of the two hands crossed. | Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. | |
Secondary | Endurance change | Endurance will be evaluated with the 6-min walking test. The participant will have to walk as far as possible, in 30-meter round trips, for 6 minutes. The distance will be recorded, as well as the heart rate to determine the intensity of the effort. | Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. | |
Secondary | Upper body strength change | Upper body strength will be evaluated with the Handgrip test. The participant will have to squeeze a dynamometer with maximum isometric effort, which has to be maintained for about 5 seconds. The force created, measured in kilograms, will be recorded for both arms. | Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. | |
Secondary | Upper body strength 2 change | Upper body strength will be also evaluated with the Seated Medicine Ball Throw test. Sitting in a chair, back against the back of the chair, feet flat on the floor, the subject will have to throw a 3kg medicine ball as far as possible with both hands, starting from the chest. The distance between the subject and the medicine ball will be recorded. | Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. | |
Secondary | Coordination change | Coordination will be evaluated with the Rhythm Ladder test. The participant will have to cross as quickly as possible, and with as few mistakes as possible, a 3-meter rhythmic ladder placed on the ground. To cross the ladder, they will have to respect a sequence of foot movements: put two feet consecutively in the first square, then two feet consecutively on both sides of the same square, then put two feet in the next square, then outside, and so on. The time to complete the test and the number of errors will be recorded. | Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05563805 -
Exploring Virtual Reality Adventure Training Exergaming
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03708692 -
Menstrual Cycle Phases on Recovery and Cognitive Function
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04505345 -
Virtual Reality Cognitive Training in Alcohol Use Disorder
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04430465 -
Effects of Wholegrains on Children's Health (KORN)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02915913 -
Effects of Exercise Training on Cognitive Function and Neurotrophic Factors in Overweight Adults
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01410097 -
Physical and Cognitive Function - Look AHEAD Ancillary Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03826121 -
Efficacy and Safety of Sesame Oil Cake Extract on Improvement of Cognitive Function
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05621278 -
Children to Adults Mental and Psychosomatic Health Study (CAMPS)
|
||
Completed |
NCT05498415 -
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Efficacy of the Sleep Move Stand Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03208569 -
Anticholinergic Burden - Treatment Optimization
|
||
Completed |
NCT03793777 -
The Effect of Aronia Melanocarpa Extract on Cognitive Function
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05525299 -
Reminiscence-Based Life Review on Copying With Existential Suffering Among Older Cancer Survivors
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03698123 -
Performance Nutrition for Residents and Fellows
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04543500 -
Self-regulation of Prefrontal Cortex During Emotional Cognitive Control
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05891977 -
Effect of Tomato Paste Consumption on the Microbiota-gut-brain Axis in Healthy Adults
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05591885 -
Nutrilite Memory Builder on the Improvement of Cognitive Function
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05575752 -
Acute Health Effects of High Temperature Exposure
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03716609 -
Effects of Magnesium Supplementation on Hemodynamic Parameters and Cognitive Function
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02763514 -
The Effects of DHA- and EPA-enriched Oils on Cognitive Function and Mood
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02675621 -
Investigation of Acute Mood and Cognitive Performance Effects of Beverages Containing Phenolics in Healthy Adults
|
N/A |