Clinical Performance Clinical Trial
Official title:
Esthetic and Clinical Assessment of Injectable Resin Composite Technique Compared to Conventional Layering Technique in Patients With Multiple Spacing in the Maxillary Anterior Teeth Area.
Verified date | July 2023 |
Source | Cairo University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
injectable resin composite technique will show a better clinical and esthetic performance compared to conventional layering resin composite technique in patients with multiple spacing in the maxillary anterior teeth area or not.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 20 |
Est. completion date | December 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | October 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 20 Years to 45 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Sound and vital upper anterior teeth. - Spacing in the maxillary anterior teeth area ranging from .5mm to 2mm. - Minor misalignment, correction of peg laterals. Exclusion Criteria: - Non-vital, fractured, or cracked teeth. - Teeth with caries or in need of replacement of existing restorations. - Rampant caries, atypical extrinsic staining of teeth. - Heavy occlusion and occlusal contacts or history of bruxism. - Severe periodontal affection. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Cairo University |
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change from baseline in Esthetic anatomical form at 6,12,18& 24 months. | FDI criteria. Possible scores range from 1 (Excellent) to 5 (Immediate replacement necessary). | T1: Baseline. T2: 6 months. T3: 12 months. T4: 18 months. T5: 24 months. | |
Secondary | Change from baseline in Color match and translucency at 6,12,18& 24 months. | FDI criteria. Possible scores range from 1 (Excellent) to 5 (Immediate replacement necessary). | T1: Baseline. T2: 6 months. T3: 12 months. T4: 18 months. T5: 24 months. | |
Secondary | Change from baseline in Surface and marginal staining at 6,12,18& 24 months. | FDI criteria. Possible scores range from 1 (Excellent) to 5 (Immediate replacement necessary). | T1: Baseline. T2: 6 months. T3: 12 months. T4: 18 months. T5: 24 months. | |
Secondary | Change from baseline in Surface lustrous at 6,12,18& 24 months. | FDI criteria. Possible scores range from 1 (Excellent) to 5 (Immediate replacement necessary). | T1: Baseline. T2: 6 months. T3: 12 months. T4: 18 months. T5: 24 months. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03599232 -
Impact of Formative OSCE on Students' Summative Clinical Performance
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06092697 -
Evaluation of 3D Printed Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) and Milled PEEK Indirect Restorations Compared to Hybird Resin Composite Indirect Restorations Over One Year Period of Time ( A Randomized Clinical Trial )
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05928533 -
Performance Of Cervical Restorations Using Nitric Acid and Mineral Enriched Adhesive Versus Phosphoric Acid and Universal Adhesive
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03697005 -
One Year Clinical Evaluation of Pressed BioHPP Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK)-Based Versus Zirconia-Based Single Crowns
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03375073 -
Positive Communication and Clinical Performance in Anaesthetic Care.
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01992120 -
Utility of High-Fidelity Simulation In the Education and Assessment of Residents in the Recognition and Management of the Sepsis Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04284527 -
The Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice Validation as a Measure in Physiotherapy Student
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05509127 -
Evaluation of Cervical Restorations Performance Using Modified Universal Adhesive
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04396080 -
Prospective Clinical Trial of Onlay-carrying Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05334901 -
Performance of Curing Times and Intensitis
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05808075 -
Clinical Performance of Nano Fiber Reinforced Versus Conventional Nano Hybrid Composite in Restoring Premolars
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05337358 -
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced FRC Base and Bonded CAD/CAM Resin Composite Endocrowns Versus Conventional Lithium Disilicate Endocrowns in Posterior Teeth (1y Randomized Clinical Trial).
|
N/A |