View clinical trials related to Clinical Performance.
Filter by:Clinical performance evaluation of 3D Printed Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and milled PEEK indirect restorations compared to hybird resin composite indirect restorations over one year period of time
injectable resin composite technique will show a better clinical and esthetic performance compared to conventional layering resin composite technique in patients with multiple spacing in the maxillary anterior teeth area or not.
To evaluate the clinical performance of multifunction Nitric acid etch, mineral enriched adhesive and flowable resin composite liner versus the universal adhesive in etch and rinse mode and regular flowable liner in cervical carious anterior cavities.
In patients that need composite restorations in a compound proximal carious lesions in premolars, will the clinical performance of nano fiber reinforced resin composite restorations have similar results compared to those restored with conventional nano hybrid resin composite over two years follow up period?
Class V restorations are evaluated to reveal whether the use of modified universal adhesive will have a similar performance compared to conventional universal adhesive or not.
In patients with endodontically treated molar teeth indicated for endocrown, will the fiber reinforced FRC base and bonded CAD/CAM resin composite endocrowns restorations have a similar clinical performance to the conventional lithium disilicate endocrown over one year?
The aim of the study is to compare the effect of high intensity light cure (2200 mw/cm2) for 1 second with low intensity light cure (1200 mw/cm2) for 20 seconds on the clinical performance of bulk fill resin composite restorations in compound Class II cavities of posterior teeth
A record of the type of onlay will be made with respect to its extension, tooth or teeth to be treated, the material of clothing and the substrate on which the adhesion and cementing method, as well as the type of antagonist. To complete it, a complete clinical oral examination will be performed with oral mirrors, examination probes, joint paper, disposable gloves, masks, paper napkins, plastic cups, dental equipment lighting lamp, cold spray , photogrammed camera, including an intraoral scan to have a 3D file of the patient's condition on the day of embedding placement. Once treatment is complete, the patient should go to routine check-ups in which a full intraoral exploration and data collection intended to be carried out analyze the following variables (USPHS modificated): possible decemented and fractured, decay and marginal integrity, sensitivity or loss of vitality, as well as the degree of patient satisfaction (VAS).
The objective of this study is to determine the reliability and validity of the assesment of physiotherapy practice (APP) in physiotherapy students. Concretely the study aims to verify if the APP created by the professors of specific methods of intervention in physiotherapy course is a reliable tool to evaluate student performance of history taking and physical examination in the same course.
The clinical performance (using the modified Ryge criteria) and patient satisfaction ( using VAS questionnaire) of pressed BioHPP PEEK based posterior single crowns compared to zirconia based crowns are questionable as the peek is considered as a new material and need to be tested for future clinical application.