View clinical trials related to Clinical Performance.
Filter by:Clinical performance evaluation of 3D Printed Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and milled PEEK indirect restorations compared to hybird resin composite indirect restorations over one year period of time
injectable resin composite technique will show a better clinical and esthetic performance compared to conventional layering resin composite technique in patients with multiple spacing in the maxillary anterior teeth area or not.
To evaluate the clinical performance of multifunction Nitric acid etch, mineral enriched adhesive and flowable resin composite liner versus the universal adhesive in etch and rinse mode and regular flowable liner in cervical carious anterior cavities.
In patients that need composite restorations in a compound proximal carious lesions in premolars, will the clinical performance of nano fiber reinforced resin composite restorations have similar results compared to those restored with conventional nano hybrid resin composite over two years follow up period?
Class V restorations are evaluated to reveal whether the use of modified universal adhesive will have a similar performance compared to conventional universal adhesive or not.
The clinical performance (using the modified Ryge criteria) and patient satisfaction ( using VAS questionnaire) of pressed BioHPP PEEK based posterior single crowns compared to zirconia based crowns are questionable as the peek is considered as a new material and need to be tested for future clinical application.