Cirrhosis Clinical Trial
Official title:
Non-invasive Methods to Predict Portal Hypertensive Gastropathy in Patients With Cirrhosis
Portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) is used to describe the endoscopic appearance of gastric mucosa in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension, with a characteristic mosaic-like pattern with or without red spots. The severity of PHG can vary from mild to severe, and patients with PHG are at an increased risk of acute and chronic gastrointestinal bleeding. According to the study by Kim et al, severe PHG showed a significantly high-risk of mortality and reduced expected survival time than none or mild PHG. Therefore, we need to detect PHG as soon as possible.However, as an invasive examination, endoscopy examination may massive gastrointestinal bleeding or gastric perforation. Most patients are afraid and disable to tolerate it, which significantly reduces the real morbidity of PHG and delays the time for diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, there is a need to find effective non-invasive methods that can predict patients with PHG in the early stage, especially which require treatment.
Cirrhosis is the end-stage of every chronic liver disease. Histologically, cirrhosis is
characterized by regenerative nodules surrounded by fibrous bands, which can be divided into
compensated phase and decompensated one. Compensated phase is referred to as asymptomatic
stages, also known as compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). Decompensated
cirrhosis is a rapidly progressive phase marked by the development of complications of portal
hypertension (PH) and/or liver dysfunction. As the disease progresses, the presence of PH and
liver dysfunction can lead to the appearance of ascites, esophagogastric variceal bleeding
(EVB), hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and so on, marking the transition from a compensated to a
decompensated phase.
Portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) is one of the common complications of cirrhosis as
well, which is considered to be a potential cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB).
PHG is used to describe the endoscopic appearance of gastric mucosa in cirrhosis patients,
with a characteristic mosaic-like pattern with or without red spots, which was significantly
underestimated due to its absence of typical clinical manifestations. The pathogenesis and
risk factors of PHG in patients with liver cirrhosis are still controversial, but the
pathogenesis are generally believed to be related to PH and advanced liver dysfunction. The
presence of PHG is usually combined with esophageal varices (EVs). The severity degree of PHG
can vary from no/mild to severe, and patients with PHG are at an increased risk of acute and
chronic gastrointestinal bleeding . The overall prevalence of PHG varies from 4% to 98% . PHG
accounts for 0.8-40% of UGIB in patients with cirrhosis and 8-50% of non-variceal UGIB, among
which 2-12% of PHG can cause acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB), up to 95% of
which is associated with severe PHG and may be life-threatening. The prevalence of chronic
UGIB in patients with PHG ranges from 3 to 26%, which can lead to iron-deficiency anemia. The
proportion of UGIB that also can be attributed to mild PHG (range, 3.5-31%). The mortality
rate related to PHG bleeding is nearly 12.5%.
According to the study by Kim et al., severe PHG showed a significantly high risk of
mortality and reduced expected survival time than none or mild PHG. At present, most of the
researches and guidelines usually do not recommend primary prevention for patients with mild
PHG, however NSBB as primary prevention should be used for mild PHG combined with small EV
(guidelines recommend don't need primary prevention for small EV). The risk of UGIB with
severe PHG is higher than that with mild PHG, which means that NSBB should also be considered
for prevention even without EVs. For PHG patients with chronic iron deficiency anemia, after
excluding anemia caused by other causes, not only should use NSBB to reduce portal venous
pressure and the risk of bleeding, but also should pay attention to iron supplementation.
From the above, obviously, it is of great important to detect patients with PHG as soon as
possible. Nowadays, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) is the gold standard for
measuring PHG. However, as an invasive examination, endoscopy examination may massive
gastrointestinal bleeding or gastric perforation. Most patients are afraid and disable to
tolerate it, which significantly reduces the real morbidity of PHG and delays the time for
diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, there is a need to find effective non-invasive methods
that can predict patients with PHG in the early stage, especially which require treatment.
Recently, there had been significant efforts in the last decade to assess the utility of
non-invasive techniques and methods for the evaluation of liver fibrosis (LS) and portal
pressure as well as the presence of EVs in patients with cirrhosis. Recently, the most
promising technique is the measurement of LS by transient elastography (TE), either alone or
combined with other parameters, had confirmed to be evaluated the seviety of liver fibrosis
in patients with chronic liver disease, predicted the presence of clinically significant
portal hypertension (CSPH) and ruled out high-risk esophageal varices (HEVs) in patients with
cirrhosis. The use of TE alone can effectively assess liver fibrosis and portal hypertension
by liver stiffness measurement (LSM), but the diagnostic accuracy of EVs is limited.The
Baveno VI report guidelines acknowledged this application and recommend that LS combined with
platelet count (PLT) can rule out HEVs in patients with cACLD, it means that LS<20 kPa plus
PLT>150×109/L had a very low risk of having HEVs and therefore do not require routine
screening endoscopy. The criteria were validated and expanded extent to allow more people to
avoid endoscopic screening. According to the studies by Kim et al, LS-spleen diameter to
platelet ratio score (liver stiffness×spleen diameter/platelet count, LSPS) , LS combined
with other parameters,was clearly superior to the performance of LS alone for predicting EVs
in patients with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis, and subsequently validated as a reliable
predictor for CSPH in patients with cirrhosis by several studies. The PH risk score
(-5.953+0.188×LS + 1.583 ×sex (1: male; 0: female) +26.705×spleen diameter/platelet count)
has been firstly developed by Berzigotti et al.for diagnosis of CSPH in patients with
cirrhosis of any cause. In addition, platelet count to spleen diameter ratio (PSR) and
aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio (APRI) have also been confirmed by some studies that
can partly predict the seviety of liver fibrosis and EVs.
Some recent studies have reported that non-invasive methods also can predict PHG in patients
with cirrhosis to some extent. Zhang et al.established a model for predicting PHG combined
with ultrasound examination related indicators, but the model was complex and diagnostic
accuracy was poor. Yang et al.proposed a VAP scoring system combined spleen volume, platelet
count and albumin, which can predict the presence of EVs and PHG in patients with chronic
liver disease, but the results of this study have not been validated. Mandhwani et
al.explored the efficacy of PSR and right liver lobe diameter to albumin ratio (PLAR) in
predicting PHG in patients with cirrhosis, PSR was the better predictor better than PLAR.
More recently, a study suggested that the accuracy of LS in predicting the presence of PHG in
patients with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis was good. However, few high-quality studies used
non-invasive methods combined LS and other parameters to predict the PHG in patients with
liver cirrhosis, considering portal hypertension was the common pathogenesis of EVs and PHG,
we speculated that the above non-invasive methods combined LS and other routine parameters
are also suitable for predicting PHG in patients with cirrhosis.
The aim of this study was to establish a new predictive model (PHG risk score) for diagnosing
PHG in patients with cirrhosis, then to compare the diagnostic accuracy of PHG risk score,
the non-invasive models combined with LS and other non-invasive models combined with routine
parameters in predicting PHG in patients with cirrhosis.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT01884415 -
Phase III, Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Two Different HBV Vaccination Schemes in Patients With Hepatic Cirrhosis
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05014594 -
Sodium-glucose Linked Transporter 2 (SGLT-2) Inhibitors in Recurrent Ascites: a Pilot RCT
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03631147 -
The Effect of Rifaximin on Portal Vein Thrombosis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04939350 -
Evaluation of the Vaccination Coverage of Cirrhotic Patients Followed in the General Hospitals in France in 2021
|
||
Completed |
NCT02528760 -
To Determine the Role of Prokinetics in Feed Intolerance in Critically Ill Cirrhosis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05484206 -
Effect of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of VIR-2218 and VIR-3434
|
Phase 1 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05538546 -
Baveno VI Criteria in Dynamic Monitoring of High-risk Varices in Compensated Cirrhotic Patients
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04053231 -
Hepatocarcinoma Recurrence on the Liver Study - Part2
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02983968 -
Use of the French Healthcare Insurance Database
|
||
Completed |
NCT02705534 -
Sofosbuvir, Ledipasvir, Ribavirin for Hepatitis C Cirrhotics, Genotype 1
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02596880 -
Sofosbuvir, Daclatasvir, Ribavirin for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Cirrhotics
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02247414 -
Warfarin Prevents Portal Vein Thrombosis in Patients After Laparoscopic Splenectomy and Azygoportal Disconnection
|
Phase 4 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01956864 -
Study of High-Dose Oral Vitamin D for the Prevention of Liver Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02016196 -
Rifaximin vs Placebo for the Prevention of Encephalopathy in Patients Treated by TIPS
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01447537 -
Mechanisms Involved in the Benefits of an Exercise Programme in Patients With Cirrhosis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02113631 -
Comparative Effectiveness and Tolerability of Boceprevir vs Telaprevir
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01362855 -
Advance Care Planning Evaluation in Hospitalized Elderly Patients
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01205074 -
¹³C-Methacetin Breath Test (MBT) Methodology Study
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01476995 -
Prognostic Indicators as Provided by the EPIC ClearView
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01231828 -
Method of Assessment of Driving Ability in Patients Suffering From Wakefulness Pathologies.
|
N/A |