Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03506893
Other study ID # 38RC17.109
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date July 17, 2018
Est. completion date December 31, 2025

Study information

Verified date May 2022
Source University Hospital, Grenoble
Contact Sandra DAVID-TCHOUDA, MD
Phone +33 476 76 71 86
Email sdavidtchouda@chu-grenoble.fr
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The hypothesis is that the Alfapump® strategy would be more effective in terms of QALYs generated , and that the cost of Alfapump® device and its implantation will be totally or partially offset by the reduction in the number of evacuating parentheses performed and the reduction in the number of complications in patients with refractory ascites awaiting liver transplantation or not. On the other hand, given the difference in the clinical profiles of these two populations (whether or not they are awaiting transplantation), these two populations will be study separately Evaluation of the medical-economic impact at 1 year of the two therapeutic strategies: implantation of Alfapump® versus repeated evacuating paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites without scheduled liver transplantation.


Description:

Refractory ascites is one of the complications associated with portal hypertension in the cirrhotic patient. To date, its treatment consists of evacuating punctures, performed in day hospitalisation, whose frequency is adapted to the rate of ascites synthetis. Paracentesis, which does not affect the mechanisms of ascites formation, contributes to protein catabolism and undernutrition. They also have an inconvenience linked to the gesture, making frequent hospital stays necessary. For all these reasons, the patient's quality of life is diminished. The AlfapumpĀ® system is a new method for the treatment of refractory ascites. It is a completely internalized medical device, implanted under the skin, which mobilizes ascites from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder, where ascites is eliminated by urinary tract.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 90
Est. completion date December 31, 2025
Est. primary completion date December 31, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patient with refractory ascites who has had a minimum of 5 paracentesis in the last 3 months. - Patient with an estimated life expectancy of at least 6 months on the day of inclusion. - Patient with contraindication to the application of a TIPS or who has expressed a refusal of the procedure or a non-functional TIPS - Patient affiliated with or in receipt of social security - Informed and written consent signed by the patient. Exclusion Criteria: - Local or systemic infection in the month preceding the procedure - Hepatocellular carcinoma with palliative care - MELD Score > 18 - Child Pugh C Score > 10 - Creatinine Clearance < 50 ml/mn - Digestive hemorrhage or episode of hepatic encephalopathy within two weeks prior to device insertion - Contraindication to general anesthesia - Contraindication to implant surgery of the device: - Obstructive urological impairment - Partitioning of ascites - Coagulopathy - Persons referred to in Articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the CSP (corresponding to all protected persons: pregnant woman, parturient, breastfeeding mother, person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, person subject to a legal protection measure). - Patient currently participating in other clinical research or who participated in a clinical trial within one month prior to inclusion.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Alphapump
Alfapump® device: a completely internalized medical device, implanted under the skin, which mobilizes ascites from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder where they are eliminated by the urinary tract. Medical device marked CE, used in the indication provided for marking
Procedure:
Ascites puncture
Hospitalizations for evacuating ascites are performed at least twice a month and can be up to 2 times a week. A clinical and biological examination is carried out at each visit.

Locations

Country Name City State
France Amiens-Picardie University Hospital Amiens
France Chu Angers Angers
France Jean MINJOZ Univesity Hospital Besançon
France Haut-Lévêque Hospital Bordeaux
France Beaujon Hospital Clichy la garenne
France Grenoble University Hospital Grenoble
France LA PITIE SALPETRIERE Univesity Hospital Paris
France Chu Pontchaillou Rennes
France Toulouse University Hospital Toulouse

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University Hospital, Grenoble

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

References & Publications (6)

Bellot P, Welker MW, Soriano G, von Schaewen M, Appenrodt B, Wiest R, Whittaker S, Tzonev R, Handshiev S, Verslype C, Moench C, Zeuzem S, Sauerbruch T, Guarner C, Schott E, Johnson N, Petrov A, Katzarov K, Nevens F, Zapater P, Such J. Automated low flow pump system for the treatment of refractory ascites: a multi-center safety and efficacy study. J Hepatol. 2013 May;58(5):922-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Jan 11. — View Citation

Bureau C, Adebayo D, Chalret de Rieu M, Elkrief L, Valla D, Peck-Radosavljevic M, McCune A, Vargas V, Simon-Talero M, Cordoba J, Angeli P, Rosi S, MacDonald S, Malago M, Stepanova M, Younossi ZM, Trepte C, Watson R, Borisenko O, Sun S, Inhaber N, Jalan R. Alfapump® system vs. large volume paracentesis for refractory ascites: A multicenter randomized controlled study. J Hepatol. 2017 Nov;67(5):940-949. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 21. Erratum in: J Hepatol. 2018 Jan 29;:. J Hepatol. 2020 Mar;72(3):595-596. — View Citation

Solà E, Solé C, Ginès P. Management of uninfected and infected ascites in cirrhosis. Liver Int. 2016 Jan;36 Suppl 1:109-15. doi: 10.1111/liv.13015. Review. — View Citation

Stepanova M, Nader F, Bureau C, Adebayo D, Elkrief L, Valla D, Peck-Radosavljevic M, McCune A, Vargas V, Simon-Talero M, Cordoba J, Angeli P, Rossi S, MacDonald S, Capel J, Jalan R, Younossi ZM. Patients with refractory ascites treated with alfapump® system have better health-related quality of life as compared to those treated with large volume paracentesis: the results of a multicenter randomized controlled study. Qual Life Res. 2018 Jun;27(6):1513-1520. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1813-8. Epub 2018 Feb 19. — View Citation

Stirnimann G, Berg T, Spahr L, Zeuzem S, McPherson S, Lammert F, Storni F, Banz V, Babatz J, Vargas V, Geier A, Stallmach A, Engelmann C, Trepte C, Capel J, De Gottardi A. Treatment of refractory ascites with an automated low-flow ascites pump in patients with cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Nov;46(10):981-991. doi: 10.1111/apt.14331. Epub 2017 Sep 21. — View Citation

Thomas MN, Sauter GH, Gerbes AL, Stangl M, Schiergens TS, Angele M, Werner J, Guba M. Automated low flow pump system for the treatment of refractory ascites: a single-center experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Dec;400(8):979-83. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1356-1. Epub 2015 Nov 13. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Evaluation of medical-economic impact at 1 year of 2 strategies: implantation of Alfapump® device versus repeated evacuating paracentesis (reference treatment) in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites without programmed liver transplantation. Incremental cost-utility ratio (ICER) from societal perspective. 1 year
Secondary Comparison of the clinical impact at 6 and 12 months of Alfapump® versus repeated evacuating paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites WITHOUT programmed liver transplantation. Evaluation of the paracentesis-free survival, cirrhosis and device-related adverse events. 6 months and 1 year
Secondary Evaluation of the clinical impact at 6 and 12 months of Alfapump® versus repeated evacuating paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites WITH programmed liver transplantation. Evaluation of the paracentesis-free survival, cirrhosis and device-related adverse events. 6 months and 1 year
Secondary Evaluation of the economic impact at 6 and 12 months of Alfapump® versus repeated evacuating paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites WITH programmed liver transplantation. Incremental cost-utility ratio. 6 months and 1 year
Secondary Evaluation of the clinical impact at 2 years of Alfapump® versus repeated evacuating paracentesis (prospective observational study). Evaluation of paracentesis-free survival, cirrhosis and device-related adverse events. We will analyse separately patients WITH and WITHOUT programmed liver transplantation. 2 years
Secondary Evaluation of the economic impact at 2 years of Alfapump® versus repeated evacuating paracentesis (prospective observational study). Incremental cost-utility ratio. We will analyse separately patients WITH and WITHOUT programmed liver transplantation. 2 years
Secondary Budget impact Analysis from the point of view of French health insurance, at 3 and 5 years. Economic consequences of the introduction of the AlfapumpĀ® device in the management strategies of cirrhotic patients presenting a refractory ascites. 3 and 5 years
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT01884415 - Phase III, Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Two Different HBV Vaccination Schemes in Patients With Hepatic Cirrhosis Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05014594 - Sodium-glucose Linked Transporter 2 (SGLT-2) Inhibitors in Recurrent Ascites: a Pilot RCT Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT03631147 - The Effect of Rifaximin on Portal Vein Thrombosis N/A
Completed NCT04939350 - Evaluation of the Vaccination Coverage of Cirrhotic Patients Followed in the General Hospitals in France in 2021
Completed NCT02528760 - To Determine the Role of Prokinetics in Feed Intolerance in Critically Ill Cirrhosis N/A
Recruiting NCT05484206 - Effect of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of VIR-2218 and VIR-3434 Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT05538546 - Baveno VI Criteria in Dynamic Monitoring of High-risk Varices in Compensated Cirrhotic Patients
Not yet recruiting NCT04053231 - Hepatocarcinoma Recurrence on the Liver Study - Part2
Recruiting NCT02983968 - Use of the French Healthcare Insurance Database
Completed NCT02705534 - Sofosbuvir, Ledipasvir, Ribavirin for Hepatitis C Cirrhotics, Genotype 1 Phase 3
Completed NCT02596880 - Sofosbuvir, Daclatasvir, Ribavirin for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Cirrhotics Phase 3
Completed NCT02247414 - Warfarin Prevents Portal Vein Thrombosis in Patients After Laparoscopic Splenectomy and Azygoportal Disconnection Phase 4
Withdrawn NCT01956864 - Study of High-Dose Oral Vitamin D for the Prevention of Liver Cancer Phase 1
Completed NCT02016196 - Rifaximin vs Placebo for the Prevention of Encephalopathy in Patients Treated by TIPS Phase 3
Completed NCT02113631 - Comparative Effectiveness and Tolerability of Boceprevir vs Telaprevir N/A
Completed NCT01447537 - Mechanisms Involved in the Benefits of an Exercise Programme in Patients With Cirrhosis N/A
Completed NCT01362855 - Advance Care Planning Evaluation in Hospitalized Elderly Patients
Active, not recruiting NCT01205074 - ¹³C-Methacetin Breath Test (MBT) Methodology Study Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT01476995 - Prognostic Indicators as Provided by the EPIC ClearView N/A
Completed NCT01231828 - Method of Assessment of Driving Ability in Patients Suffering From Wakefulness Pathologies. N/A